Who Develops Talent Best in the Pac-12?

Only problem with that chart is it doesn't mention the time period being evaluated, classic propaganda tell.

Still good chit though.
 
Only problem with that chart is it doesn't mention the time period being evaluated, classic propaganda tell.

Still good chit though.
Click to expand...

Motherfucker YOU FUCKING DO ONE THEN. You stupid fuck.

Also - how much fucking space do you think I have to put text in?

Fuck off with this shit.
 
Only problem with that chart is it doesn't mention the time period being evaluated, classic propaganda tell.

Still good chit though.
Click to expand...

Motherfucker YOU FUCKING DO ONE THEN. You stupid fuck.

Also - how much fucking space do you think I have to put text in?

Fuck off with this shit.
Click to expand...
You have the whole bottom right corner. You don't want to do it that's fine but don't act like you wanted to and it wouldn't fit.

Fuck off with that shit.
 
Only problem with that chart is it doesn't mention the time period being evaluated, classic propaganda tell.

Still good chit though.
Click to expand...

Motherfucker YOU FUCKING DO ONE THEN. You stupid fuck.

Also - how much fucking space do you think I have to put text in?

Fuck off with this shit.
Click to expand...

We’re lucky dennis posts at all
 
Only problem with that chart is it doesn't mention the time period being evaluated, classic propaganda tell.

Still good chit though.
Click to expand...

Motherfucker YOU FUCKING DO ONE THEN. You stupid fuck.

Also - how much fucking space do you think I have to put text in?

Fuck off with this shit.
Click to expand...

Rage-filled and irrational Dennis is best Dennis.
 
Only problem with that chart is it doesn't mention the time period being evaluated, classic propaganda tell.

Still good chit though.
Click to expand...

Motherfucker YOU FUCKING DO ONE THEN. You stupid fuck.

Also - how much fucking space do you think I have to put text in?

Fuck off with this shit.
Click to expand...

We’re lucky dennis posts at all
Click to expand...

THANKS FOR ALL YOU DOOO STAFF!!!¡¡11111
 
good chit, but some recruits and their families will always take the coffee cup in the hand versus two in the bush...some dads won't fly; just won't....some recruits will always want to be closer to home (Bama) and some recruits will always enjoy recruiting more than getting developed.

another way of saying i don't think we really have much more upside than we're hitting now.

just my opinion; don't twist.
 
good chit, but some recruits and their families will always take the coffee cup in the hand versus two in the bush...some dads won't fly; just won't....some recruits will always want to be closer to home (Bama) and some recruits will always enjoy recruiting more than getting developed.

another way of saying i don't think we really have much more upside than we're hitting now.

just my opinion; don't twist.
Click to expand...

WHO GIVES A FUCKING FUCK? God are people here completely fucking retarded or what?

SO WHAT - I UNDERSTAND WHAT KIDS DO YOU STUPID FUCKING MORON.

This is just DATA you idiot.

Also, @HillsboroDuck makes a good point, actually. That's why I got angry.

My excuse is that I was referencing @AIRWOLF's tweet and I forgot those time periods wouldn't be included. I originally meant it as a reply to his tweet.

Here's what @HillsboroDuck wanted. Feel free to tweet this one.
bn1zd7k4l5yn.png
 
good chit, but some recruits and their families will always take the coffee cup in the hand versus two in the bush...some dads won't fly; just won't....some recruits will always want to be closer to home (Bama) and some recruits will always enjoy recruiting more than getting developed.

another way of saying i don't think we really have much more upside than we're hitting now.

just my opinion; don't twist.
Click to expand...

WHO GIVES A FUCKING FUCK? God are people here completely fucking retarded or what?

SO WHAT - I UNDERSTAND WHAT KIDS DO YOU STUPID FUCKING MORON.

This is just DATA you idiot.

Also, @HillsboroDuck makes a good point, actually. That's why I got angry.

My excuse is that I was referencing @AIRWOLF's tweet and I forgot those time periods wouldn't be included. I originally meant it as a reply to his tweet.

Here's what @HillsboroDuck wanted. Feel free to tweet this one.
View attachment 16299
Click to expand...
Perfection

And fuck me. Yes, I had to edit that.
 
Last edited:
good chit, but some recruits and their families will always take the coffee cup in the hand versus two in the bush...some dads won't fly; just won't....some recruits will always want to be closer to home (Bama) and some recruits will always enjoy recruiting more than getting developed.

another way of saying i don't think we really have much more upside than we're hitting now.

just my opinion; don't twist.
Click to expand...

WHO GIVES A FUCKING FUCK? God are people here completely fucking retarded or what?

SO WHAT - I UNDERSTAND WHAT KIDS DO YOU STUPID FUCKING MORON.

This is just DATA you idiot.

Also, @HillsboroDuck makes a good point, actually. That's why I got angry.[/b]

My excuse is that I was referencing @AIRWOLF's tweet and I forgot those time periods wouldn't be included. I originally meant it as a reply to his tweet.

Here's what @HillsboroDuck wanted. Feel free to tweet this one.
View attachment 16299
Click to expand...

Dwta86N.jpg

 
You should do a HH graph showing the expected fucktardness of HH denizens relative to their length of stay here ... just for fun.
 
https://twitter.com/Dennis_DY_UW/status/1070766784624627714https://twitter.com/Dennis_DY_UW/status/1070767560960954369

Black eye for USC, UCLA, Stanford and Oregon, IMO.

Feel free to retweet this if you want good players in our class.
Click to expand...

What is the methodology for "expected # of all P12 players"? Hope it isn't as simple as # of 4/5 star recruits but I can't figure out how you give any value to 2/3*s and OSU still ends up at just 1 expected all conference player over 3 years.
 
https://twitter.com/Dennis_DY_UW/status/1070766784624627714https://twitter.com/Dennis_DY_UW/status/1070767560960954369

Black eye for USC, UCLA, Stanford and Oregon, IMO.

Feel free to retweet this if you want good players in our class.
Click to expand...

What is the methodology for "expected # of all P12 players"? Hope it isn't as simple as # of 4/5 star recruits but I can't figure out how you give any value to 2/3*s and OSU still ends up at just 1 expected all conference player over 3 years.
Click to expand...

Go fuck yourself.

To even ask this fucking dumb of a question means you either think I'm a retard or you're a retard. In either case, fuck off.

But if you must know...

--so, first just M and SD for all AC players per team; M roughly 6, SD roughly 5.
--then z score for average recruit during the relevant period (using the 1-100 composite scale because FUCKING OBVIOUSLY THE STAR SCALE DOESN'T WORK YOU FUCKING IDIOT)

Then...

EV = MEAN(AC) + z-score(REC)*SD(AC)

Like a fucking expected value calculation.

How the fuck did you think I was doing it?

I hope some day one of you morons posts something interesting. Until then fuck off.
 
https://twitter.com/Dennis_DY_UW/status/1070766784624627714https://twitter.com/Dennis_DY_UW/status/1070767560960954369

Black eye for USC, UCLA, Stanford and Oregon, IMO.

Feel free to retweet this if you want good players in our class.
Click to expand...

What is the methodology for "expected # of all P12 players"? Hope it isn't as simple as # of 4/5 star recruits but I can't figure out how you give any value to 2/3*s and OSU still ends up at just 1 expected all conference player over 3 years.
Click to expand...

Go fuck yourself.

To even ask this fucking dumb of a question means you either think I'm a retard or you're a retard. In either case, fuck off.

But if you must know...

--so, first just M and SD for all AC players per team; M roughly 6, SD roughly 5.
--then z score for average recruit during the relevant period (using the 1-100 composite scale because FUCKING OBVIOUSLY THE STAR SCALE DOESN'T WORK YOU FUCKING IDIOT)

Then...

EV = MEAN(AC) + z-score(REC)*SD(AC)

Like a fucking expected value calculation.

How the fuck did you think I was doing it?

I hope some day one of you morons posts something interesting. Until then fuck off.
Click to expand...

I laughed.
 
https://twitter.com/Dennis_DY_UW/status/1070766784624627714https://twitter.com/Dennis_DY_UW/status/1070767560960954369

Black eye for USC, UCLA, Stanford and Oregon, IMO.

Feel free to retweet this if you want good players in our class.
Click to expand...

What is the methodology for "expected # of all P12 players"? Hope it isn't as simple as # of 4/5 star recruits but I can't figure out how you give any value to 2/3*s and OSU still ends up at just 1 expected all conference player over 3 years.
Click to expand...

Go fuck yourself.

To even ask this fucking dumb of a question means you either think I'm a retard or you're a retard. In either case, fuck off.

But if you must know...

--so, first just M and SD for all AC players per team; M roughly 6, SD roughly 5.
--then z score for average recruit during the relevant period (using the 1-100 composite scale because FUCKING OBVIOUSLY THE STAR SCALE DOESN'T WORK YOU FUCKING IDIOT)

Then...

EV = MEAN(AC) + z-score(REC)*SD(AC)

Like a fucking expected value calculation.

How the fuck did you think I was doing it?

I hope some day one of you morons posts something interesting. Until then fuck off.
Click to expand...

tenor.gif


Straightforward and awesome. Retweeted from my "positive" account. It seems to have gotten some attention. Great job DDY.
 
https://twitter.com/Dennis_DY_UW/status/1070766784624627714https://twitter.com/Dennis_DY_UW/status/1070767560960954369

Black eye for USC, UCLA, Stanford and Oregon, IMO.

Feel free to retweet this if you want good players in our class.
Click to expand...

What is the methodology for "expected # of all P12 players"? Hope it isn't as simple as # of 4/5 star recruits but I can't figure out how you give any value to 2/3*s and OSU still ends up at just 1 expected all conference player over 3 years.
Click to expand...

Go fuck yourself.

To even ask this fucking dumb of a question means you either think I'm a retard or you're a retard. In either case, fuck off.

But if you must know...

--so, first just M and SD for all AC players per team; M roughly 6, SD roughly 5.
--then z score for average recruit during the relevant period (using the 1-100 composite scale because FUCKING OBVIOUSLY THE STAR SCALE DOESN'T WORK YOU FUCKING IDIOT)

Then...

EV = MEAN(AC) + z-score(REC)*SD(AC)

Like a fucking expected value calculation.

How the fuck did you think I was doing it?

I hope some day one of you morons posts something interesting. Until then fuck off.
Click to expand...

tenor.gif


Straightforward and awesome. Retweeted from my "positive" account. It seems to have gotten some attention. Great job DDY.
Click to expand...

OH SHIT I JUST PASSED MY JUNIOR YEAR STATS CLASS!!!! WOOOOO!!!!
 
https://twitter.com/Dennis_DY_UW/status/1070766784624627714https://twitter.com/Dennis_DY_UW/status/1070767560960954369

Black eye for USC, UCLA, Stanford and Oregon, IMO.

Feel free to retweet this if you want good players in our class.
Click to expand...

What is the methodology for "expected # of all P12 players"? Hope it isn't as simple as # of 4/5 star recruits but I can't figure out how you give any value to 2/3*s and OSU still ends up at just 1 expected all conference player over 3 years.
Click to expand...

Go fuck yourself.

To even ask this fucking dumb of a question means you either think I'm a retard or you're a retard. In either case, fuck off.

But if you must know...

--so, first just M and SD for all AC players per team; M roughly 6, SD roughly 5.
--then z score for average recruit during the relevant period (using the 1-100 composite scale because FUCKING OBVIOUSLY THE STAR SCALE DOESN'T WORK YOU FUCKING IDIOT)

Then...

EV = MEAN(AC) + z-score(REC)*SD(AC)
Click to expand...

tenor.gif

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top