White privilege
- Thread starter SFGbob
- Start date
How pathetic. You support a party that needs fucking safe spaces when they get "triggered". A party that wants to force people to change their terminology on things like heritage, sexual orientation, gender bending all because they get "triggered" when people don't say what rats want them to say.
FFS HH, do us all a little favor and practice a little introspection and self awareness. Your hypocrisy is nauseating.
Last edited:
The point was I asked you a question and you didn't answer. Twice.
So fuck off with your evading bullshit.
Can you imagine what the dazzler's mythical clients think about his communication skills?
You punch a man and he dies you do time
Used to anyway
Not surprised the world's worst attorney doesn't know that
https://mountfordchambers.com/blog-one-punch-manslaughter-one-size-does-not-fit-all/
A single punch most commonly would be charged as common assault, ABH or GBH depending on the severity of the injury. However where there is death, it would likely be charged as unlawful act manslaughter. Unlawful act manslaughter (otherwise known as constructive manslaughter) is where a death has occurred as a consequence of a criminal act. The criminal act must be one from which a reasonable person would realise some risk of physical harm arises. Whether the offender intended the harm or knew the act was unlawful is irrelevant.
The Sentencing Council guidelines came into force in November 2018. They presented a more nuanced approach in relation to unlawful act manslaughter. There are four levels of culpability. Predominantly, a one punch assault would likely fall within medium culpability (“where there was an intention on part of the offender to cause harm (or reckless as to harm caused) and it falls between higher and lower culpability”). Medium culpability has a starting point of 6 years’ custody with a range of 3 to 9 years – a significant increase on the guidance issued in Furby.
There is, however, leeway to consider placing the offence in lower culpability if, for example, the death was caused by an unlawful act which was in self-defence (where not amounting to a defence). This has a starting point of 2 years. By the same token, if the punch is considered to be closer to an assault under GBH, the higher culpability category has a starting point of 12 years’ custody.
It is clear that this type of offence requires considerable discretion and a full assessment of facts. A ‘one size fits all’ approach is too restrictive and these new guidelines provided much needed flexibility, demonstrated by the Sentencing Council determining a range of 1 to 24 years’ custody as appropriate for unlawful act manslaughter.
Sounds like 2 years is the least
Used to anyway
Not surprised the world's worst attorney doesn't know that
https://mountfordchambers.com/blog-one-punch-manslaughter-one-size-does-not-fit-all/
A single punch most commonly would be charged as common assault, ABH or GBH depending on the severity of the injury. However where there is death, it would likely be charged as unlawful act manslaughter. Unlawful act manslaughter (otherwise known as constructive manslaughter) is where a death has occurred as a consequence of a criminal act. The criminal act must be one from which a reasonable person would realise some risk of physical harm arises. Whether the offender intended the harm or knew the act was unlawful is irrelevant.
The Sentencing Council guidelines came into force in November 2018. They presented a more nuanced approach in relation to unlawful act manslaughter. There are four levels of culpability. Predominantly, a one punch assault would likely fall within medium culpability (“where there was an intention on part of the offender to cause harm (or reckless as to harm caused) and it falls between higher and lower culpability”). Medium culpability has a starting point of 6 years’ custody with a range of 3 to 9 years – a significant increase on the guidance issued in Furby.
There is, however, leeway to consider placing the offence in lower culpability if, for example, the death was caused by an unlawful act which was in self-defence (where not amounting to a defence). This has a starting point of 2 years. By the same token, if the punch is considered to be closer to an assault under GBH, the higher culpability category has a starting point of 12 years’ custody.
It is clear that this type of offence requires considerable discretion and a full assessment of facts. A ‘one size fits all’ approach is too restrictive and these new guidelines provided much needed flexibility, demonstrated by the Sentencing Council determining a range of 1 to 24 years’ custody as appropriate for unlawful act manslaughter.
Sounds like 2 years is the least
What do they called illegally armed white pedophiles who get shot in self defense?
You called it murder
Definitely worthy of the death penalty
Hack
Ashley Babbitt allegedly used the N word at the Capitol cop and therefore it was a good shooting. All words are equal, just some are more equal than others.
Gibberish from the hack
This wasn't a stand your ground it was a one punch manslaughter that I linked about
You're wrong and I'm right
As usual
Dodge and deflect
Westlinn made you look like a fool
Again
So Race posted the actual law about manslaughter. Words are not a self-defense against either assault or manslaughter. The dazzler has called my a racist, in the dazzler's mythical legal world that means I get one free punch against an actual racist phuck that thinks that black people are unable to control themselves and should be held to a different legal standard. He could post the statute or Constitutional language that supports a separate legal standards for blacks. I won't hold my breath.