What will the doogs be saying at 4-3

[bananasnblondes]

UW is 4-0 right now so you're not allowed to say anything remotely suggesting that the dawgs might not be as good as Alabama or you are a miserable loser who just wants Sark to fail so you can be right. Despite being 4-0 for the first time in over a decade, UW's onfield performance has firmly cemented them as the 4th or 5th best looking team in the Pac with a country mile between them and Oregon/Stanford/UCLA.

It is likely that UW will lose @Stanford, Oregon, and @ASU. There is the possibility of a couple plungers in there as well. If 4-3 happens, what will be the doogs battle cry? Will the maintain their "We were expected to lose these games, what more do you want?" attitude. Will they start the"do you want Willingham back?" chant or will they simply devolve to their usual "why don't you try coaching the team" routine? If the dawgs can somehow win a few games in the coming weeks it will be interesting, and if they don't it will be interesting.

 

[[Deleted User]]

"Look we just played three really good teams. At 0-12 in 2008 we would have killed to have played in these big games. Sark has this program turned around. We'll win out and go 9-3 and win the bowl game to be 10-3. Sometimes you have to face adversity before you can go forward. Don James didn't go undefeated every single season like some of you guys unrealistically expect.

To expect a Rose Bowl or a National Title every season after 0-12 is just ridiculous. Some of you guys really need to let it play out. We are lucky that Sark still coaches here and should be honored he took out us out of the 0-12 hole." - Kim

 

[dnc]

At the danger of sounding like a doog, what have you seen that establishes a cuntry mile between UW and UCLA? I'm as pro Mora as anyone anywhere, but IMO both teams have looked equally good/not yet great. What am I missing?

 

[Fire_Marshall_Bill]

UW is 4-0 right now so you're not allowed to say anything remotely suggesting that the dawgs might not be as good as Alabama or you are a miserable loser who just wants Sark to fail so you can be right. Despite being 4-0 for the first time in over a decade, UW's onfield performance has firmly cemented them as the 4th or 5th best looking team in the Pac with a country mile between them and Oregon/Stanford/UCLA.

It is likely that UW will lose @Stanford, Oregon, and @ASU. There is the possibility of a couple plungers in there as well. If 4-3 happens, what will be the doogs battle cry? Will the maintain their "We were expected to lose these games, what more do you want?" attitude. Will they start the"do you want Willingham back?" chant or will they simply devolve to their usual "why don't you try coaching the team" routine? If the dawgs can somehow win a few games in the coming weeks it will be interesting, and if they don't it will be interesting.

You'll hear all those excuses.

 

[Mad_Son]

At the danger of sounding like a doog, what have you seen that establishes a cuntry mile between UW and UCLA? I'm as pro Mora as anyone anywhere, but IMO both teams have looked equally good/not yet great. What am I missing?

Mora is in year 2. Sark is in year 5. Mora is recruiting linemen like they are baseball cards. Sark avoids linemen like the plague. Even if things have looked comparable so far, they are not actually comparable.

 

[dnc]

At the danger of sounding like a doog, what have you seen that establishes a cuntry mile between UW and UCLA? I'm as pro Mora as anyone anywhere, but IMO both teams have looked equally good/not yet great. What am I missing?

Mora is in year 2. Sark is in year 5. Mora is recruiting linemen like they are baseball cards. Sark avoids linemen like the plague. Even if things have looked comparable so far, they are not actually comparable.

Jake Almighty. If the question is who would I rather have as my coach it's not even a debate.

That's not the question of this thread though. The question is which team is better this season, and I think it's very close. If I'm betting who has the better year I'll take UCLA but I don't think it's anywhere near a cuntry mile.

 

[Mad_Son]

At the danger of sounding like a doog, what have you seen that establishes a cuntry mile between UW and UCLA? I'm as pro Mora as anyone anywhere, but IMO both teams have looked equally good/not yet great. What am I missing?

Mora is in year 2. Sark is in year 5. Mora is recruiting linemen like they are baseball cards. Sark avoids linemen like the plague. Even if things have looked comparable so far, they are not actually comparable.

Jake Almighty. If the question is who would I rather have as my coach it's not even a debate.

That's not the question of this thread though. The question is which team is better this season, and I think it's very close. If I'm betting who has the better year I'll take UCLA but I don't think it's anywhere near a cuntry mile.

I thought the question of this thread was judging Sark on the next two games =P

I am just saying arguments about the two teams looking similar this season look better on Mora than Sark. I haven't watched any UCLA games to compare so I do what I can.

 

[Mad_Son]

At the danger of sounding like a doog, what have you seen that establishes a cuntry mile between UW and UCLA? I'm as pro Mora as anyone anywhere, but IMO both teams have looked equally good/not yet great. What am I missing?

Mora is in year 2. Sark is in year 5. Mora is recruiting linemen like they are baseball cards. Sark avoids linemen like the plague. Even if things have looked comparable so far, they are not actually comparable.

Jake Almighty. If the question is who would I rather have as my coach it's not even a debate.

That's not the question of this thread though. The question is which team is better this season, and I think it's very close. If I'm betting who has the better year I'll take UCLA but I don't think it's anywhere near a cuntry mile.

I thought the question of this thread was judging Sark on the next two games =P

I am just saying arguments about the two teams looking similar this season look better on Mora than Sark. I haven't watched any UCLA games to compare so I do what I can.

Ok, that is a different thread. This thread is about the field.

 

[dnc]

At the danger of sounding like a doog, what have you seen that establishes a cuntry mile between UW and UCLA? I'm as pro Mora as anyone anywhere, but IMO both teams have looked equally good/not yet great. What am I missing?

Mora is in year 2. Sark is in year 5. Mora is recruiting linemen like they are baseball cards. Sark avoids linemen like the plague. Even if things have looked comparable so far, they are not actually comparable.

Jake Almighty. If the question is who would I rather have as my coach it's not even a debate.

That's not the question of this thread though. The question is which team is better this season, and I think it's very close. If I'm betting who has the better year I'll take UCLA but I don't think it's anywhere near a cuntry mile.

I thought the question of this thread was judging Sark on the next two games =P

I am just saying arguments about the two teams looking similar this season look better on Mora than Sark. I haven't watched any UCLA games to compare so I do what I can.

Well played.

Agree that any similarities between the two is better for Mora than Sark.

 

[droggins]

If we get to 4 and 3 they should say, "finally, the annual 3-game losing streak is over"

 

[chuck]

Gotta beat ASU. Doogs will defend losing to Stanford and the Ducks. People will be jumping ship and de-doogifying themselves if we lose to ASU. Not everyone, mind you, but many.

 

[[Deleted User]]

Gotta beat ASU. Doogs will defend losing to Stanford and the Ducks. People will be jumping ship and de-doogifying themselves if we lose to ASU. Not everyone, mind you, but many.

Doogs are fucking idiots. They will defend the coach until the bitter end.

The HHB iron laws are never wrong.

 

[DugtheDoog]

UW is 4-0 right now so you're not allowed to say anything remotely suggesting that the dawgs might not be as good as Alabama or you are a miserable loser who just wants Sark to fail so you can be right. Despite being 4-0 for the first time in over a decade, UW's onfield performance has firmly cemented them as the 4th or 5th best looking team in the Pac with a country mile between them and Oregon/Stanford/UCLA.

It is likely that UW will lose @Stanford, Oregon, and @ASU. There is the possibility of a couple plungers in there as well. If 4-3 happens, what will be the doogs battle cry? Will the maintain their "We were expected to lose these games, what more do you want?" attitude. Will they start the"do you want Willingham back?" chant or will they simply devolve to their usual "why don't you try coaching the team" routine? If the dawgs can somehow win a few games in the coming weeks it will be interesting, and if they don't it will be interesting.

D)all of the above

 

[puppylove_sugarsteel]

they would be right where LSU, Alabama, Georgia, TAMU and South Carolina would be under the same situation.

 

[[Deleted User]]

they would be right where LSU, Alabama, Georgia, TAMU and South Carolina would be under the same situation.

You are a dumb fuck! Not one of those schools would lose to ASU. Bama would probably be undefeated, I think Georgia and LSU could go 2-1 as well as TAMU. Only South Carolina would without a doubt be 1-2.

 

[Fire_Marshall_Bill]

Gotta beat ASU. Doogs will defend losing to Stanford and the Ducks. People will be jumping ship and de-doogifying themselves if we lose to ASU. Not everyone, mind you, but many.

Yeah, this.

The more moderate Doogs will be pissed at 4-3.

 

[dhdawg]

Simple, they'll be posting stuff like "price has proven he can't win big games, time to put in Miley Cyrus"

 

[Tailgater]

UW is 4-0 right now so you're not allowed to say anything remotely suggesting that the dawgs might not be as good as Alabama or you are a miserable loser who just wants Sark to fail so you can be right. Despite being 4-0 for the first time in over a decade, UW's onfield performance has firmly cemented them as the 4th or 5th best looking team in the Pac with a country mile between them and Oregon/Stanford/UCLA.

It is likely that UW will lose @Stanford, Oregon, and @ASU. There is the possibility of a couple plungers in there as well. If 4-3 happens, what will be the doogs battle cry? Will the maintain their "We were expected to lose these games, what more do you want?" attitude. Will they start the"do you want Willingham back?" chant or will they simply devolve to their usual "why don't you try coaching the team" routine? If the dawgs can somehow win a few games in the coming weeks it will be interesting, and if they don't it will be interesting.

Never hesitate to overload your wad before wasting it on another headliner (I like '50's talk, yes I do). UW won't be favored in either of the next two games and shouldn't be. Unless he shows more (probably a lot more) than he has thus far as a head coach, who could expect Sarkisian to manufacture an upset in either? Stanford and Oregon sit unchallenged atop the mediocre Pac-12. It may or may not be doog football, but focusing on our program again is getting easier.

ASU and the trip to Tempe is three weeks away. Anybody looking that far ahead should hold on to their wad a bit longer. For now, it's enough to say that the 2013 Huskies are improved with obvious potential to get better as the season progresses and except for Oregon should be expected to win all of their remaining home games,........ probably with more command of scoreboard results than we could have hoped for when the season began.

 

[CFetters_Nacho_Lover]

UW is 4-0 right now so you're not allowed to say anything remotely suggesting that the dawgs might not be as good as Alabama or you are a miserable loser who just wants Sark to fail so you can be right. Despite being 4-0 for the first time in over a decade, UW's onfield performance has firmly cemented them as the 4th or 5th best looking team in the Pac with a country mile between them and Oregon/Stanford/UCLA.

It is likely that UW will lose @Stanford, Oregon, and @ASU. There is the possibility of a couple plungers in there as well. If 4-3 happens, what will be the doogs battle cry? Will the maintain their "We were expected to lose these games, what more do you want?" attitude. Will they start the"do you want Willingham back?" chant or will they simply devolve to their usual "why don't you try coaching the team" routine? If the dawgs can somehow win a few games in the coming weeks it will be interesting, and if they don't it will be interesting.

Never hesitate to overload your wad before wasting it on another headliner (I like '50's talk, yes I do). UW won't be favored in either of the next two games and shouldn't be. Unless he shows more (probably a lot more) than he has thus far as a head coach, who could expect Sarkisian to manufacture an upset in either? Stanford and Oregon sit unchallenged atop the mediocre Pac-12. It may or may not be doog football, but focusing on our program again is getting easier.

ASU and the trip to Tempe is three weeks away. Anybody looking that far ahead should hold on to their wad a bit longer. For now, it's enough to say that the 2013 Huskies are improved with obvious potential to get better as the season progresses and except for Oregon should be expected to win all of their remaining home games,........ probably with more command of scoreboard results than we could have hoped for when the season began.

Expect a message from PL_SS

 

[Passion]

At the danger of sounding like a doog, what have you seen that establishes a cuntry mile between UW and UCLA? I'm as pro Mora as anyone anywhere, but IMO both teams have looked equally good/not yet great. What am I missing?

Mora is in year 2. Sark is in year 5. Mora is recruiting linemen like they are baseball cards. Sark avoids linemen like the plague. Even if things have looked comparable so far, they are not actually comparable.

Amen.

From today's Seattle Times: Stanford and Oregon defensive lines are the best UW will see all season, Sarkisian said. “They’re really, really good,” he said of Stanford. “They’re big, they’re fast, they’re strong, they’re athletic. Don’t let them fool you — those Stanford D-linemen are athletic. You saw it last week” (with DE/OLB Trent Murphy returning an interception for a touchdown, as he did against UW last year).

Must be nice.