what will be the 3 annual plungers this year

[McRib]

Is it wrong to mention Boise State as a plunger game?

THIS. And wouldn't it just set the tone for another 7 and 6 bonanza.
Very well could come to fruition.

 

[TierbsHsotBoobs]

Is it wrong to mention Boise State as a plunger game?

THIS. And wouldn't it just set the tone for another 7 and 6 bonanza.
Very well could come to fruition.

If Boise plungers Washington, 7-6 is very unlikely.

It would be the 2008 Oregon game all over again for Doog Nation. Get your screenshots now while you still can.

 

[[Deleted User]]

Is it wrong to mention Boise State as a plunger game?

THIS. And wouldn't it just set the tone for another 7 and 6 bonanza.
Very well could come to fruition.

If Boise plungers Washington, 7-6 is very unlikely.

It would be the 2008 Oregon game all over again for Doog Nation. Get your screenshots now while you still can.

You'll see a lot of "I had always believed in Sark until the Boise game" although there should have been so many more eye openers to Sark being a shitty coach.

Just like people who just now realized Kim is an idiot after Oregon got a slap on the wrist were missing the boat.

 

[Gladstone]

Oregon will be a plunger rape, unfortunately. Look at the one constant among every team that has beaten them recently: dominant DL that can control the line of scrimmage and effectively neuter the read option. Our DL? :|

 

[IrishDawg22]

I am going out on a limb and saying that they will not suffer 1 if the criteria is 20+.

If it happens, I will stop posting on this site when the clock hit :00 in the 4th qtr.

Free screenshot.

 

[RoadDawg55]

I am going out on a limb and saying that they will not suffer 1 if the criteria is 20+.

If it happens, I will stop posting on this site when the clock hit :00 in the 4th qtr.

Free screenshot.

Bold statement. It will probably happen at least once. I do think the 30+ point plungers won't happen this year. We are still going 7-6 though.

 

[[Deleted User]]

I am going out on a limb and saying that they will not suffer 1 if the criteria is 20+.

If it happens, I will stop posting on this site when the clock hit :00 in the 4th qtr.

Free screenshot.

Well nice knowing ya.

Sark has lost by 20+ points as follows:

Year One: 3 times
Year Two: 4 times(all by 30+)
Year Three: 2 times(every loss by double figures though)
Year Four: 3 times(all by 30+)

With this quick no huddle offense that means more possessions for both teams so if a game gets ugly the more likely you can really get plunger raped.

I think Stanford, UCLA for sure and most likely Oregon as well.

 

[TierbsHsotBoobs]

I am going out on a limb and saying that they will not suffer 1 if the criteria is 20+.

If it happens, I will stop posting on this site when the clock hit :00 in the 4th qtr.

Free screenshot.

What username will you switch to when the inevitable happens?

 

[HoustonHusky]

Ore
@Stan
@UCLA

 

[IrishDawg22]

I am going out on a limb and saying that they will not suffer 1 if the criteria is 20+.

If it happens, I will stop posting on this site when the clock hit :00 in the 4th qtr.

Free screenshot.

What username will you switch to when the inevitable happens?

We will cross that bridge when we get there.

 

[HillsboroDuck]

I am going out on a limb and saying that they will not suffer 1 if the criteria is 20+.

If it happens, I will stop posting on this site when the clock hit :00 in the 4th qtr.

Free screenshot.

What username will you switch to when the inevitable happens?

Allow me to be the first to properly welcome FactChecker to this bored:

LEAVE!