Mad_Son
New Fish
http://www.scout.com/college/footba...e=players&team=USC&minimumInterest=SoftVerbal
Of course this list may be shrinking soon as the page is updated...
Of course this list may be shrinking soon as the page is updated...
When USC has coaching turmoil they lose the kids from SEC and B1G territory to the Michigan, Notre Dame, and Alabamas. The SoCal SC ride or die kids don't go anywhere.
And then USC poaches a few kids from other PAC schools that were dying for an offer.
So overall the Sarkplosion is a small negative for UW's recruiting outlook.
When USC has coaching turmoil they lose the kids from SEC and B1G territory to the Michigan, Notre Dame, and Alabamas. The SoCal SC ride or die kids don't go anywhere.
And then USC poaches a few kids from other PAC schools that were dying for an offer.
So overall the Sarkplosion is a small negative for UW's recruiting outlook.
Agree. Overall this is bad for us in recruiting probably. They might come after some of our kids like McGrew, Eifler and Wattenburg.
The only kid it could potentially help with is Juarez and as @BallSacked has told us on numerous occasions, he's not leaving LA.
Yeah. He's one of those guys that likely won't leave LA. And if he does it'll be ND or Michigan, not UW. Ditto Jack Jones. Broons think they already flipped Juarez. He's been committed to SC but has been going to lots of UCLA events and said he is announcing at an all-star game? His mom is very pro-UCLA on Instagram. He's also the same player as Eifler - athletic OLB.When USC has coaching turmoil they lose the kids from SEC and B1G territory to the Michigan, Notre Dame, and Alabamas. The SoCal SC ride or die kids don't go anywhere.
And then USC poaches a few kids from other PAC schools that were dying for an offer.
So overall the Sarkplosion is a small negative for UW's recruiting outlook.
Agree. Overall this is bad for us in recruiting probably. They might come after some of our kids like McGrew, Eifler and Wattenburg.
The only kid it could potentially help with is Juarez and as @BallSacked has told us on numerous occasions, he's not leaving LA.
For UW - the Sarkening is probably a net negative, if anything. For UCLA it could be a big positive or big negative...depends how bad it gets and who they hire and on what timeline.
I could see Trevon Sidney flipping...but he's a slot receiver and that's probably the position UW needs the least. Martin appears to be wavering, but a big time kid from Mater Dei (SC factory) probably sticks in the end and if he doesn't he'll go ND or UCLA.
For UW - the Sarkening is probably a net negative, if anything. For UCLA it could be a big positive or big negative...depends how bad it gets and who they hire and on what timeline.
How dare you! I'm not a Seattle Birkenstock wearing fat person. HTH.I could see Trevon Sidney flipping...but he's a slot receiver and that's probably the position UW needs the least. Martin appears to be wavering, but a big time kid from Mater Dei (SC factory) probably sticks in the end and if he doesn't he'll go ND or UCLA.
For UW - the Sarkening is probably a net negative, if anything. For UCLA it could be a big positive or big negative...depends how bad it gets and who they hire and on what timeline.
I have suspected for some time you were Scott Eklund. Now I know you are.