Week 1 over reaction thread

dannarc said:
For the 200th Tim, we are not losing to OSU!
They are playing with fire coming up here. If they F’ up a possession or two early in the game and allow us to take any kind of a lead, the NS upper deck will reign down thunder seldom seen or heard
Click to expand...
tOSU still has dudes everywhere and should control the LOS.
 
This is a doog take, but so did Michigan last year on the lines, and UW actually looked halfway decent at the LOS in that game with the homefield advantage.

They then went on to maul Ohio State
 
I'd also add that Rahshawn Clark flashed a couple times in this game. The hometown player could end up being a good one, hope he sticks around.
 
thechatch said:
THANK YOU for attending my Ted Talk.
Click to expand...
I agree Oregon looked talented. Then again, they've always looked big and fast.

Lanning likes to send the house against inferior teams and they generally do overwhelm these kind of opponents. He sent pretty much every player against all of their punts and he blitzed like crazy all game.

I won't be sold on Oregon until I see Dante Moore against a defense with a pulse who can fuck with his eyes and pressure him. He folded like a chair as soon as conference play started up the last go around.

I won't be sold on Oregon until you see them matched up with a team that they can't intimidate so quickly. They don't don't take getting punched in the mouth very well… never have.
 
Last edited:
PostGameOrangeSlices said:
This is a doog take, but so did Michigan last year on the lines, and UW actually looked halfway decent at the LOS in that game with the homefield advantage.

They then went on to maul Ohio State
Click to expand...
Sayin still probably looked better against a legit team than what Michigan had at QB. They legit had can't complete a forward pass level problems at QB, and they didn't have Jeremiah Smith and Carnell Tate at WR and whatever probably blue chip guys Ohio State has behind them.
It's still pretty insane with how good Michigan was at certain spots that we not only beat them, but by double digits.
 
By the way, no one asked for any of you fucks' Oregon takes. Put away the KY and Kleenex after an FCS game
 
WoolleyDoog said:
By the way, no one asked for any of you fucks' Oregon takes. Put away the KY and Kleenex after an FCS game
Click to expand...
I don’t think anyone’s hanging any banners(we do that in June typically). That said it is very obvious that Oregon is 2 level talented at just about all positions. Montana St is Montana St but there isn’t that big of a gulf between them and Colorado St, if at all.

UW will be better next year than in 2024. Maybe even good enough to win a road game.

HTH
 
I propose a $129 fee for the right to use the term "2 level talented"
 
Last edited:
WoolleyDoog said:
PostGameOrangeSlices said:
This is a doog take, but so did Michigan last year on the lines, and UW actually looked halfway decent at the LOS in that game with the homefield advantage.

They then went on to maul Ohio State
Click to expand...
Sayin still probably looked better against a legit team than what Michigan had at QB. They legit had can't complete a forward pass level problems at QB, and they didn't have Jeremiah Smith and Carnell Tate at WR and whatever probably blue chip guys Ohio State has behind them.
It's still pretty insane with how good Michigan was at certain spots that we not only beat them, but by double digits.
Click to expand...
Michigan is very poorly coached. Will only get worse every week they’re removed from Harbaugh. You’ll beat them again this year.
 
WoolleyDoog said:
PostGameOrangeSlices said:
This is a doog take, but so did Michigan last year on the lines, and UW actually looked halfway decent at the LOS in that game with the homefield advantage.

They then went on to maul Ohio State
Click to expand...
Sayin still probably looked better against a legit team than what Michigan had at QB. They legit had can't complete a forward pass level problems at QB, and they didn't have Jeremiah Smith and Carnell Tate at WR and whatever probably blue chip guys Ohio State has behind them.
It's still pretty insane with how good Michigan was at certain spots that we not only beat them, but by double digits.
Click to expand...
Sayin was 13-20 with 4 good balls dropped. Two by Jeremiah Smith no less. Smith had 1 drop last year. All season.
We must have watched different games because I thought Sayin looked solid. Further, the OSU D was wicked stout.
They looked every bit the part of a CFP final 4 team.
 
thechatch said:
THANK YOU for attending my Ted Talk.
Click to expand...
  1. I'd say DeGraaf is a good complimentary piece and am looking forward to seeing Omari Evans (was he dinged up or was it a disciplinary thing)?
  2. I didn't watch the Oregon vs. Sisters Mary of the Poor, looks like they at least 4 RBs who could start for most B1G teams. Still, UW vs. UC Davis could have some people saying the same thing about UW (which wouldn't be true b/c of the 2023 team).
  3. Not much to say
  4. Ohio State doesn't have the veteran QB, the great RBs, and the overwhelming numbers at WR but their OL is still good and they have that Purdue TE. They don't have Chip Kelly and I'd like to see their D vs. a better QB and WRs. Texas used to have very good WRs and it didn't seem like they still have the dudes there.
  5. I bet Georgia is reloaded.
  6. Agreed.
  7. Probably agree
I didn't watch that much of the Michigan game but didn't think they looked that good, particularly on D. Their DL is nowhere near where it was in 2023 and most of 2024. Maybe it was an off-game. I'm also not sold on their DBs.
 
Georgia picked up Zechariah Branch from SC. I have a feeling we’ll see him dancing into the end zone in the natty game.
 
The Chatch, I thought you had been killed off by The Terminator and left with The Refuge and were a 2 level talent in The Tug. It appears you have gotten all gowed with your brethren over the Bobcats and are ready to rumble again. I'll offer this. If you want to bury the Landen Hatchett this year when you're beloved Savannah Bananas shit play up here I'll tell you to meet me somewhere. I'll not show up, take a picture of you, and then point and laugh.
 
BroadcastingDawg said:
thechatch said:
THANK YOU for attending my Ted Talk.
Click to expand...
I agree Oregon looked talented. Then again, they've always looked big and fast.

Lanning likes to send the house against inferior teams and they generally do overwhelm these kind of opponents. He sent pretty much every player against all of their punts and he blitzed like crazy all game.

I won't be sold on Oregon until I see Dante Moore against a defense with a pulse who can fuck with his eyes and pressure him. He folded like a chair as soon as conference play started up the last go around.

I won't be sold on Oregon until you see them matched up with a team that they can't intimidate so quickly. They don't don't take getting punched in the mouth very well… never have.
Click to expand...
That's literally the opposite of what Oregon does against almost every team. They're incredibly conservative. Oh, it's BroadcastingDoog vomiting doog bullshit. Carry on. Also, Oregon isn't physical potd.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top