We will finish November with over 1.3 million page views

Coker the 7 seed, years after his last post. Impressive.

He was a #1 seed and still posting a bit when the Circle Jerk occurred in 2019.

I disagree with @DerekJohnson that the seeding was rigged by @Gladstone but a playoff committee of one is bound to make mistakes.

To @YellowSnow’s point, the whole TSIO gang, including @CokeGreaterThanPepsi, were still pretty popular here when the voting took place.

But then the great BDTW schism happened.

Anyway, it would be interesting if there was some @UW_Doog_Bot analysis of posters in the post-Petersen era. (I don’t think the site could handle another Circle Jerk like the first one. The geo-political landscape of the site has become too acrimonious for it to be any fun or have any sort of decent voter turnout.)

I was being facetious

I wasn’t!
 
Coker the 7 seed, years after his last post. Impressive.

He was a #1 seed and still posting a bit when the Circle Jerk occurred in 2019.

I disagree with @DerekJohnson that the seeding was rigged by @Gladstone but a playoff committee of one is bound to make mistakes.

To @YellowSnow’s point, the whole TSIO gang, including @CokeGreaterThanPepsi, were still pretty popular here when the voting took place.

But then the great BDTW schism happened.

Anyway, it would be interesting if there was some @UW_Doog_Bot analysis of posters in the post-Petersen era. (I don’t think the site could handle another Circle Jerk like the first one. The geo-political landscape of the site has become too acrimonious for it to be any fun or have any sort of decent voter turnout.)

I was being facetious

I don't know what that word means.

I was joking around. Malarkey!

We’ve had enough of your tomfoolery, sir!
 
Coker the 7 seed, years after his last post. Impressive.

He was a #1 seed and still posting a bit when the Circle Jerk occurred in 2019.

I disagree with @DerekJohnson that the seeding was rigged by @Gladstone but a playoff committee of one is bound to make mistakes.

To @YellowSnow’s point, the whole TSIO gang, including @CokeGreaterThanPepsi, were still pretty popular here when the voting took place.

But then the great BDTW schism happened.

Anyway, it would be interesting if there was some @UW_Doog_Bot analysis of posters in the post-Petersen era. (I don’t think the site could handle another Circle Jerk like the first one. The geo-political landscape of the site has become too acrimonious for it to be any fun or have any sort of decent voter turnout.)

Acrimonious? Wasn't it always? Isn't that part of the appeal?
 
Back
Top