We will be podding on Saturday morning

Ironically, we've been gaining audience despite the deepest apathy for Husky Football in decades.
 
Ironically, we've been gaining audience despite the deepest apathy for Husky Football in decades.
Click to expand...

Even though it’s been a big lull in the history of the program I still look forward to doing the podcast every time.
 
Ironically, we've been gaining audience despite the deepest apathy for Husky Football in decades.
Click to expand...

You've got a good crew of north end, hillbilly, side kicks.
 
Ironically, we've been gaining audience despite the deepest apathy for Husky Football in decades.
Click to expand...

americans-are-getting-dumber-in-one-graph-L-_h5Gob.png

 
Ironically, we've been gaining audience despite the deepest apathy for Husky Football in decades.
Click to expand...

The site is always better after a loss. So I'm not surprised.
Click to expand...

Joking aside, the site's numbers are down to 2014-15 levels.
 
@DerekJohnson you want me to dm you another link to one of my songs? got this new mixtape that fiyaaaaa!
Click to expand...

It turns out you lied to me. You had said The Final Countdown was one of your original compositions.
 
If the new conference ccg rules were in place starting in 2011 would that year's champion be a different team, in any year?

2016 I'm not sure USC gets into the game but I'd have to look it up.

Which reminds me, what is going to be the tie breaker if a few teams tie for 2nd and didn't play each other.
 
Last edited:
If the new conference ccg rules were in place starting in 2011 would that year's champion be a different team, in any year?

2016 I'm not sure USC gets into the game but I'd have to look it up.

Which reminds me, what is going to be the tie breaker if a few teams tie for 2nd and didn't play each other[/b].
Click to expand...

I was wondering that myself
 
If the new conference ccg rules were in place starting in 2011 would that year's champion be a different team, in any year?

2016 I'm not sure USC gets into the game but I'd have to look it up.

Which reminds me, what is going to be the tie breaker if a few teams tie for 2nd and didn't play each other.
Click to expand...

If the new commissioner isn't playing games about making playoffs, you pick the highest ranked team in the official CFP poll.
 
If the new conference ccg rules were in place starting in 2011 would that year's champion be a different team, in any year?

2016 I'm not sure USC gets into the game but I'd have to look it up.

Which reminds me, what is going to be the tie breaker if a few teams tie for 2nd and didn't play each other.
Click to expand...

If the new commissioner isn't playing games about making playoffs, you pick the highest ranked team in the official CFP poll.
Click to expand...

I can see that, but that would suck.

I'd look at common opponent record and then who the fuck cares after that because it's going to be stupid.
 
If the new conference ccg rules were in place starting in 2011 would that year's champion be a different team, in any year?

2016 I'm not sure USC gets into the game but I'd have to look it up.

Which reminds me, what is going to be the tie breaker if a few teams tie for 2nd and didn't play each other[/b].
Click to expand...

I was wondering that myself
Click to expand...

Probably go by rankings
 
Last edited:
If the new conference ccg rules were in place starting in 2011 would that year's champion be a different team, in any year?

2016 I'm not sure USC gets into the game but I'd have to look it up.

Which reminds me, what is going to be the tie breaker if a few teams tie for 2nd and didn't play each other.
Click to expand...

If the new commissioner isn't playing games about making playoffs, you pick the highest ranked team in the official CFP poll.
Click to expand...

I can see that, but that would suck.

I'd look at common opponent record and then who the fuck cares after that because it's going to be stupid.
Click to expand...

I hate common opponent. Because one team puts on a chokehold and beats the Beavs by say 40. Another team steps off the gas and wins by 28. Do you want to penalize the team that won by 28 instead of 40?
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top