We will be podding on Saturday morning

If the new conference ccg rules were in place starting in 2011 would that year's champion be a different team, in any year?

2016 I'm not sure USC gets into the game but I'd have to look it up.

Which reminds me, what is going to be the tie breaker if a few teams tie for 2nd and didn't play each other.

If the new commissioner isn't playing games about making playoffs, you pick the highest ranked team in the official CFP poll.

That is exactly what they will do, and is why they are doing this in the 1st place.
 
If the new conference ccg rules were in place starting in 2011 would that year's champion be a different team, in any year?

2016 I'm not sure USC gets into the game but I'd have to look it up.

Which reminds me, what is going to be the tie breaker if a few teams tie for 2nd and didn't play each other.

If the new commissioner isn't playing games about making playoffs, you pick the highest ranked team in the official CFP poll.

That is exactly what they will do, and is why they are doing this in the 1st place.

Well the Seattle Times article said that it would be based on conference winning percentage
 
If the new conference ccg rules were in place starting in 2011 would that year's champion be a different team, in any year?

2016 I'm not sure USC gets into the game but I'd have to look it up.

Which reminds me, what is going to be the tie breaker if a few teams tie for 2nd and didn't play each other.

From the PAC-12 news release, 2016 would still be UW vs Colorado but the 2018 game would be an Apple Cup rematch.

5rs4deom60m5.png
https://pac-12.com/article/2022/05/18/pac-12-announces-change-football-championship-game-format
 
If the new conference ccg rules were in place starting in 2011 would that year's champion be a different team, in any year?

2016 I'm not sure USC gets into the game but I'd have to look it up.

Which reminds me, what is going to be the tie breaker if a few teams tie for 2nd and didn't play each other.

From the PAC-12 news release, 2016 would still be UW vs Colorado but the 2018 game would be an Apple Cup rematch.

View attachment 49651
https://pac-12.com/article/2022/05/18/pac-12-announces-change-football-championship-game-format

Astronomers refer to 2018 as a Haley's Comet Moment
 
Ironically, we've been gaining audience despite the deepest apathy for Husky Football in decades.

Even though it’s been a big lull in the history of the program I still look forward to doing the podcast every time.

What does this say about your family and friends?

Also, when I first read that, I thought it said "Iuli" in the history of the program and I was trying to remember if the Dawgs ended up signing Straw Hat Vita.
 
Ironically, we've been gaining audience despite the deepest apathy for Husky Football in decades.

The site is always better after a loss. So I'm not surprised.

Joking aside, the site's numbers are down to 2014-15 levels.

Losing at home to Montana ran some people away. I don't blame them.

Then got blown out by Michigan then lost in embarrassing fashion to Oregon state before even opening conference play.

Then in conference play went ahead 21-7 and had to win a nail biter in OT to fucking Cal.

Pretty obvious that even backing into a north title was a pipe dream after that game
 
Last edited:
Ironically, we've been gaining audience despite the deepest apathy for Husky Football in decades.

The site is always better after a loss. So I'm not surprised.

Joking aside, the site's numbers are down to 2014-15 levels.

Losing at home to Montana ran some people away. I don't blame them.

Then got blown out by Michigan then lost in embarrassing fashion to Oregon state before even opening conference play.

Then in conference play went ahead 21-7 and had to win a nail biter in OT to fucking Cal.

Pretty obvious that even backing into a north title was a pipe dream after that game

What conference did Oregon State drop to?
 
Ironically, we've been gaining audience despite the deepest apathy for Husky Football in decades.

The site is always better after a loss. So I'm not surprised.

Joking aside, the site's numbers are down to 2014-15 levels.

Losing at home to Montana ran some people away. I don't blame them.

Then got blown out by Michigan then lost in embarrassing fashion to Oregon state before even opening conference play.

Then in conference play went ahead 21-7 and had to win a nail biter in OT to fucking Cal.

Pretty obvious that even backing into a north title was a pipe dream after that game

What conference did Oregon State drop to?

Wherever Idaho dropped to.
 
Ironically, we've been gaining audience despite the deepest apathy for Husky Football in decades.

The site is always better after a loss. So I'm not surprised.

Joking aside, the site's numbers are down to 2014-15 levels.

Losing at home to Montana ran some people away. I don't blame them.

Then got blown out by Michigan then lost in embarrassing fashion to Oregon state before even opening conference play.

Then in conference play went ahead 21-7 and had to win a nail biter in OT to fucking Cal.

Pretty obvious that even backing into a north title was a pipe dream after that game

What conference did Oregon State drop to?

Haie has NEVER and I repeat NEVER been accused of having even the slightest tiny bit of intelligence. hth
 
I'd like to send a shout out to @MikeDamone for being right / correct.

I'd also like to send a shout out to @PurpleBaze for his massive dong. Little did they know back in 2004 but Saddams WMD were in a pair of husky sweatpants, in a smoke shop in Seatac.

terrorist-bagdadi.gif


 
If the new conference ccg rules were in place starting in 2011 would that year's champion be a different team, in any year?

2016 I'm not sure USC gets into the game but I'd have to look it up.

Which reminds me, what is going to be the tie breaker if a few teams tie for 2nd and didn't play each other.

If the new commissioner isn't playing games about making playoffs, you pick the highest ranked team in the official CFP poll.

I can see that, but that would suck.

I'd look at common opponent record and then who the fuck cares after that because it's going to be stupid.

I hate common opponent. Because one team puts on a chokehold and beats the Beavs by say 40. Another team steps off the gas and wins by 28. Do you want to penalize the team that won by 28 instead of 40?

I wouldn't look at it beyond wins and losses.

If win loss and common opponent doesn't separate it it's going to be a shit. It's the Pac 12. Kilovitivokvk will just pick himself to get the best ratings.
 
Back
Top