IIRC the ocho runs on Denny, which is already crowded
What's dumber than retarded? Because this is way past retarded.
We need a general tweet of the day thread
- Thread starter RaceBannon
- Start date
What's dumber than retarded? Because this is way past retarded.
The voters who voted for her are dumber than retarded.
They want people like her and me dead.
Skip rooting for the away team. Get yourself inserted into the starting lineup.
AI needs to be regulated, if not banned, for the existence of humanity.
Agree to the regulation. The question is 'who' is doing the regulating.
It's never been about the technology. It's about who controls the technology.
Just my relatively novice exposure to AI is pretty amazing. It does shit 100X faster than my fingers can type.
Maybe Throbber needs to just AI his HH handle and let it rip.
More media lies. No wonder Democrats are so violent these days.
They are fed lies and then the Left acts feigns ignorance on what motivates these killers.
This lie is because the fountains were fixed for ~$2 million instead of the $300 million the DC grifters were looking to spread around to cronies and campaigns.
They are fed lies and then the Left acts feigns ignorance on what motivates these killers.
This lie is because the fountains were fixed for ~$2 million instead of the $300 million the DC grifters were looking to spread around to cronies and campaigns.
Still a bimbo
Math is racist. What possible reason are we putting up with this shit? So she is getting a professor's salary to negatively educate her students. Pretty much admits that blacks can't do math without saying it and blaming whiteness. Clearly we need more taxes to fund our public education system. Nothing else can be done.
A math education professor at the University of Illinois has argued in a recently published academic book that algebraic and geometry skills perpetuate “unearned privilege” among white people.
Rochelle Gutierrez, a professor at the University of Illinois, made the claim in a anthology for math teachers, arguing that teachers must be aware of the “politics that mathematics brings” in society.
In the book chapter, the professor explains that she sees her role as a math educator not just in the way of an educator, but that of an activist against whiteness, which she claims facilitates “microagresssions” and “privilege” between those who excel in math and those who do not.
“On many levels, mathematics itself operates as Whiteness. Who gets credit for doing and developing mathematics, who is capable in mathematics, and who is seen as part of the mathematical community is generally viewed as White,” Gutierrez argued.
Gutierrez also worries that algebra and geometry perpetuate privilege, fretting that “curricula emphasizing terms like Pythagorean theorem and pi perpetuate a perception that mathematics was largely developed by Greeks and other Europeans.”
“Perhaps more importantly, mathematics operates with unearned privilege in society, just like Whiteness. Mathematics is viewed as so pure it has become the discipline by which we measure other disciplines,” she writes.
According to the professor, math also helps actively perpetuate white privilege too, since the way our economy places a premium on math skills gives math a form of “unearned privilege” for math professors, who are disproportionately white.
“Are we really that smart just because we do mathematics?” she asks, further wondering why math professors get more research grants than “social studies or English” professors.
Further, she also worries that evaluations of math skills can perpetuate discrimination against minorities, especially if they do worse than their white counterparts.
“If one is not viewed as mathematical, there will always be a sense of inferiority that can be summoned,” she says, adding that there are so many minorities who “have experienced microaggressions from participating in math classrooms… [where people are] judged by whether they can reason abstractly.”
“It is not just that teaching is political; mathematics is also political. Therefore, whether we recognize it or not, mathematics teaching is a highly political activity,” Gutierrez writes.
To fight this, Gutierrez encourages aspiring math teachers to develop a sense of “political conocimiento,” a Spanish phrase for “political knowledge for teaching.”
“Is it just mathematics teaching that is political, or is there actually something about mathematics as a discipline that is political? A number of researchers across the globe have begun to highlight the ways in which knowledge, power, and identity are interwoven with mathematics, something called the "sociopolitical turn
Gutierrez stresses that all knowledge is “relational,” asserting that “Things cannot be known objectively; they must be known subjectively.”
“In essence, political conocimiento is the kind of knowledge that allows you to see how politics permeates everything we do, in education in general and mathematics in particular, and affects how we are connected to each other today and how we might envision a different, more humane connection for the future.”
She is a current professor at the University of Illinois, specializing in Curriculum and Instruction teaching to aspiring teachers — the same teachers she hopes to inspire and educate with her writings.
“She also builds upon Indigenous principles and has argued for a new form of mathematics where humans are no long centered. This form of mathematics is referred to as living mathematx,” according to her biography page.
A math education professor at the University of Illinois has argued in a recently published academic book that algebraic and geometry skills perpetuate “unearned privilege” among white people.
Rochelle Gutierrez, a professor at the University of Illinois, made the claim in a anthology for math teachers, arguing that teachers must be aware of the “politics that mathematics brings” in society.
In the book chapter, the professor explains that she sees her role as a math educator not just in the way of an educator, but that of an activist against whiteness, which she claims facilitates “microagresssions” and “privilege” between those who excel in math and those who do not.
“On many levels, mathematics itself operates as Whiteness. Who gets credit for doing and developing mathematics, who is capable in mathematics, and who is seen as part of the mathematical community is generally viewed as White,” Gutierrez argued.
Gutierrez also worries that algebra and geometry perpetuate privilege, fretting that “curricula emphasizing terms like Pythagorean theorem and pi perpetuate a perception that mathematics was largely developed by Greeks and other Europeans.”
“Perhaps more importantly, mathematics operates with unearned privilege in society, just like Whiteness. Mathematics is viewed as so pure it has become the discipline by which we measure other disciplines,” she writes.
According to the professor, math also helps actively perpetuate white privilege too, since the way our economy places a premium on math skills gives math a form of “unearned privilege” for math professors, who are disproportionately white.
“Are we really that smart just because we do mathematics?” she asks, further wondering why math professors get more research grants than “social studies or English” professors.
Further, she also worries that evaluations of math skills can perpetuate discrimination against minorities, especially if they do worse than their white counterparts.
“If one is not viewed as mathematical, there will always be a sense of inferiority that can be summoned,” she says, adding that there are so many minorities who “have experienced microaggressions from participating in math classrooms… [where people are] judged by whether they can reason abstractly.”
“It is not just that teaching is political; mathematics is also political. Therefore, whether we recognize it or not, mathematics teaching is a highly political activity,” Gutierrez writes.
To fight this, Gutierrez encourages aspiring math teachers to develop a sense of “political conocimiento,” a Spanish phrase for “political knowledge for teaching.”
“Is it just mathematics teaching that is political, or is there actually something about mathematics as a discipline that is political? A number of researchers across the globe have begun to highlight the ways in which knowledge, power, and identity are interwoven with mathematics, something called the "sociopolitical turn
Gutierrez stresses that all knowledge is “relational,” asserting that “Things cannot be known objectively; they must be known subjectively.”
“In essence, political conocimiento is the kind of knowledge that allows you to see how politics permeates everything we do, in education in general and mathematics in particular, and affects how we are connected to each other today and how we might envision a different, more humane connection for the future.”
She is a current professor at the University of Illinois, specializing in Curriculum and Instruction teaching to aspiring teachers — the same teachers she hopes to inspire and educate with her writings.
“She also builds upon Indigenous principles and has argued for a new form of mathematics where humans are no long centered. This form of mathematics is referred to as living mathematx,” according to her biography page.
There were idiotic profs who spouted nonsensical, woke word salads 25 years ago. I don't know if there are more, or if the internet rage bait revenue model has given them more of a voice.
Mathx is racist and gender is fluid. You shouldn't have tenure and you're a total moron.
Mathx is racist and gender is fluid. You shouldn't have tenure and you're a total moron.
There are more. DEI, especially in large state universities and the Ivies is omnipresent, even in STEM. Harvard hired Fauxcahontas got hired by Harvard Law solely because she claimed to be an American Indian woman with blond hair and blue eyes. Amount of due diligence that Harvard put into that hire? Same as Oregon does to insure you are an American citizen on you voter registration. When I was at Oregon the political science and sociology departments were full commie. Today its everywhere especially in the bloated administration departments. Then toss in the huge amount of Jew hatred by the professors and staff.
Where my paid protestors at?
Benghazi? "What difference, at this point, does it make?" Seems sort of authoritarian.
ace.mu.nu
It was ruled that Planned Parenthood was ineligible for SBA loans -- so Biden officials granted those loans anyway, claiming the loans went to... "Benghazi"?
Luke Rosiak says Biden "may have broken the law."
I'm more confident it's a crime.
Ace of Spades HQ
Quick Hits
—Disinformation Expert Ace
It was ruled that Planned Parenthood was ineligible for SBA loans -- so Biden officials granted those loans anyway, claiming the loans went to... "Benghazi"?
Luke Rosiak says Biden "may have broken the law."
I'm more confident it's a crime.