We have a ruling

SFGbob said:
I agree you're now trying harder, after we embarrassed you for 12 in a row, but that doesn't mean you weren't trying before.
Click to expand...
Gilbertson was the lazy assistant hire after they railroaded Rick because he lied about the 69er interview and he was slick Rick for reasons. I have no idea why they hired Willingham after he failed at Notre Dung and couldn't even get top 20 classes. Nobody in their right mind would say Warshington has been more successful than the Yucks this century, but for the 1,000th time, it's another cherry picked timestamp to make Oregon look like some West Coast juggernaut. USC is the only blue blood in the west.
 
YellowSnow said:
MikeSeaver said:
25 years ago all I ever wanted was for Oregon to win one Rose Bowl in my lifetime.

I’ve now seen them win three of those and two Fiesta Bowls, in person, with mine own eyes. (Also saw them lose two RB’s and a national championship game) ((Also they just went undefeated and won the Big 10 taking out OSU, Michigan and Penn State in one season))
If Alabama beat those three teams in one season they wouldn’t shut up about it for 30 years.
We now have programs like Ohio State, Miami and USC being driven to insanity purely by our very no natty existence.
Yes, things have changed and I would now like just one natty in my lifetime but the last 25 years have been pretty fucking majestic.

img-8279.gif
Click to expand...
Oregon has clearly had the best past 25 years of any school who didn’t win a NT during said time frame.
Click to expand...
So, like being in the first row behind first class.

.
 
pawz said:
YellowSnow said:
MikeSeaver said:
25 years ago all I ever wanted was for Oregon to win one Rose Bowl in my lifetime.

I’ve now seen them win three of those and two Fiesta Bowls, in person, with mine own eyes. (Also saw them lose two RB’s and a national championship game) ((Also they just went undefeated and won the Big 10 taking out OSU, Michigan and Penn State in one season))
If Alabama beat those three teams in one season they wouldn’t shut up about it for 30 years.
We now have programs like Ohio State, Miami and USC being driven to insanity purely by our very no natty existence.
Yes, things have changed and I would now like just one natty in my lifetime but the last 25 years have been pretty fucking majestic.

img-8279.gif
Click to expand...
Oregon has clearly had the best past 25 years of any school who didn’t win a NT during said time frame.
Click to expand...
So, like being in the first row behind first class.

.
Click to expand...
fair.

But at the same time stacking the most air miles and the most likely to be the next school to break through.

Winning a national championship is a lot harder now than it was 30 years ago.
I honestly can’t even think of the last school that won their first national championship. Florida in 96?
 
Florida State when Bobby finally broke through - 99?
Oregon reminds me of Clemson under Dabo. Keep swinging the axe and he got a couple in several play off appearances, Clemson had won one in 81 or so but Oregon fans don't count that of course because it wasn't in a 12 team playoff
 
And it took generational quarterbacks which is the rule not the exception. Watson and Lawrence. They have stepped back with the guys that followed
 
pawz said:
YellowSnow said:
MikeSeaver said:
25 years ago all I ever wanted was for Oregon to win one Rose Bowl in my lifetime.

I’ve now seen them win three of those and two Fiesta Bowls, in person, with mine own eyes. (Also saw them lose two RB’s and a national championship game) ((Also they just went undefeated and won the Big 10 taking out OSU, Michigan and Penn State in one season))
If Alabama beat those three teams in one season they wouldn’t shut up about it for 30 years.
We now have programs like Ohio State, Miami and USC being driven to insanity purely by our very no natty existence.
Yes, things have changed and I would now like just one natty in my lifetime but the last 25 years have been pretty fucking majestic.

img-8279.gif
Click to expand...
Oregon has clearly had the best past 25 years of any school who didn’t win a NT during said time frame.
Click to expand...
So, like being in the first row behind first class.

.
Click to expand...
Oh so you mean business class?
✈️ 🚬 🍸
 
RaceBannon said:
Florida State when Bobby finally broke through - 99?
Oregon reminds me of Clemson under Dabo. Keep swinging the axe and he got a couple in several play off appearances, Clemson had won one in 81 or so but Oregon fans don't count that of course because it wasn't in a 12 team playoff
Click to expand...
Bobbeh won his first in 93 with Chuck Ward.

Still lost at ND that year, tho.
 
Don was 19-13 in his first 3 years at UW.

Also 21-13-1 in the 3 year run up to his early 90s 2 year stretch of dominance.

James enjoyed 5(?!) 10+ win seasons over his 18 year run in Montlake.

It takes time. And sometimes it takes time again.
 
thechatch said:
Don was 19-13 in his first 3 years at UW.

Also 21-13-1 in the 3 year run up to his early 90s 2 year stretch of dominance.

James enjoyed 5(?!) 10+ win seasons over his 18 year run in Montlake.

It takes time. And sometimes it takes time again.
Click to expand...
*3 year stretch of dominance
 
YellowSnow said:
thechatch said:
Don was 19-13 in his first 3 years at UW.

Also 21-13-1 in the 3 year run up to his early 90s 2 year stretch of dominance.

James enjoyed 5(?!) 10+ win seasons over his 18 year run in Montlake.

It takes time. And sometimes it takes time again.
Click to expand...
*3 year stretch of dominance
Click to expand...
1990 - 10-2 Rose Bowl W
1991 - 12-0 Rose Bowl W
1992 - 9-3 Rose Bowl L
I’m not sure 3 losses(one of them to the Coogs) is dominance but perhaps I have higher standards than you lot.
 
thechatch said:
YellowSnow said:
thechatch said:
Don was 19-13 in his first 3 years at UW.

Also 21-13-1 in the 3 year run up to his early 90s 2 year stretch of dominance.

James enjoyed 5(?!) 10+ win seasons over his 18 year run in Montlake.

It takes time. And sometimes it takes time again.
Click to expand...
*3 year stretch of dominance
Click to expand...
1990 - 10-2 Rose Bowl W
1991 - 12-0 Rose Bowl W
1992 - 9-3 Rose Bowl L
I’m not sure 3 losses(one of them to the Coogs) is dominance but perhaps I have higher standards than you lot.
Click to expand...
3 straight conference titles. 3 straight Rose Bowls. That's pretty dominant.
The wheels came off 1992 for obvious reasons, but that squad was rolling until the suspension.
 
Head to head was the tiebreaker. 2 were outright
Not following
 
Last edited:
The Big 10 had a no repeat rule until the late 60s which would effect their records
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top