TierbsHsotBoobs
New Fish
This board is a Jim Mora lovefest.
HTH
we are at a point...
- Thread starter DerekJohnson
- Start date
This board is a Jim Mora lovefest.
HTH
I'm not confused at all. You support Sark. You just don't have the GUTS to SAY IT TO OUR FACE! #brents
IrishDawg22
New Fish
Internet tough gal must have got some sand in the vaginal area.
$75,000
Pressing.
DIAFF.
Pool Boy.
#cutelingo
D
[Deleted User]
Guest
You really don't fit in here.
If you don't get it try not to make it so obvious that you don't get you mick bastard
I said your view is clear. You support him. Clear?
I like to defend every second of Sark's life to make it clear that I don't support him
I don't support Mora
IrishDawg22
New Fish
The fact that you don't get that I get it makes it obvious that your are just not getting it.
Got it???
IrishDawg22
New Fish
D
[Deleted User]
Guest
You really suck at this. You aren't even good at trolling or even funny.
IrishDawg22
New Fish
My #1 goal here is to impress you. Please tell me it is working???
Thanks in advance for the flags & thumbs down. Your obsession with my every post means a lot to me.
Have a nice day
chrisvashon
New Fish
That loss to Baylor is as bad as any of Sark's blowouts.
Last edited:
I wouldn't go that far, but it was pretty bad. I like Mora, and would take him every time over Sark, but I do think some on here are way too quick to crown him when there is very little evidence he is a great coach. I know, Carroll struggled in the NFL as well, but Carroll actually had defenses ranked at the top of the league when he was a coordinator. When Carroll was head coach of the Patriots, he had two top 10 scoring defenses. Mora did not. If you look at his NFL stats, Mora has never had an elite defense.
Mora had two decent defenses in Atlanta (#12 in total defense), but no elite ones. His defenses were a very mixed bag, even as a DC in San Francisco. Except for the #9 ranked defense in 2001, they were all below league average each year he was DC. In 1999 and 2000, they were right at the bottom of the league in scoring defense. I won't even get into his time on the Seahawks. His defenses were terrible there as well.
Here's a link where you can check Mora's defenses by year. He was DC at SF from 1999-2003, and head coach of Atlana from 2004-2006.http://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/sfo/1999.htm
The thing Mora is doing correctly is recruiting the shit out of his lines and adding in some other elite recruits (DB class from last year.) With the way he is recruiting, he could be an average coach, and he will have some 10 win teams. If he surprises me, and becomes a very good to great coach, he is reeling in the talent to compete for national titles. For all the shit doogs said about how Sark "gets it", Mora actually "gets it" and is building his team the right way.
Last edited:
I like to compare a first year coach who won his division to a proven 4 year loser because I support Sark but can't defend his record so I talk about Mora. Irishdoogfuckingstupid
D
[Deleted User]
Guest
On Doogman the other week someone posted stats "proving" Sark was better than Mora and they only posted stats about how our secondary was better than UCLA's.
Nevermind Mora won 9 games in year one and is kicking Sark's ass in recruiting both years.