Washington, Arizona St, and UCLA Since 2009

[Tequilla]

The facts are damning ... even if you concede the fact that Sark is a good coach to those that want to argue that he is, the reality is that there are coaches doing a BETTER job in the conference:

Conference record and relative standing in the PAC since 2009:

Washington:

2009: 4-5 (7th of 10 teams)

2010: 5-4 (t-3rd of 10 teams)

2011: 5-4 (3rd in North, t-4th of 12 teams)

2012: 5-4 (4th in North, t-5th of 12 teams)

2013: 3-4 (t-4th in North, t-7th of 12 teams)

Arizona State:

2009: 2-7 (9th of 10 teams)

2010: 4-5 (t-5th of 10 teams)

2011: 4-5 (3rd in South, t-6th of 12 teams)

2012: 5-4 (t-2nd in South, t-5th of 12 teams)

2013: 6-1 (1st in South, t-1st of 12 teams)

UCLA:

2009: 3-6 (8th of 10 teams)

2010: 2-7 (9th of 10 teams)

2011: 5-4 (2nd in South, t-4th of 12 teams)

2012: 6-3 (1st in South, t-3rd of 12 teams)

2013: 5-2 (t-2nd in South, t-4th of 12 teams)

 

[MikeDamone]

UCLA isn't a fair comparison because the weather is better and the program recruits itself.

 

[CuntWaffle]

Arizona State gets a bunch of free wins every year because of the altitude and the heat. Not really fair to compare UW to them.

 

[dnc]

You act like owen12 never happened

 

[greenblood]

You guys still don't know the damage Ty did

 

[bananasnblondes]

Did Graham or Mora start at 0-12 and have a player who said football wasn't fun anymore? I dont think so. Nice try.