Wanna see a dead body?

[Sledog]

I've seen a shit load of dead bodies. None more dead than Stubby. It's a tie!

 

[UW_Doog_Bot]

So Israeli officials not happy with Trump’s buffoonish comments. Shocking.

And as usual Lard Ass issues a statement saying how much he supports Israel and no President has done more for the Jews.

I’m sure this worked whenever he cheated on one of his wives, it was all good after he told them “nobody loves you more (insert name here).”

Like I said, he’s a buffoon and embarrassment. He just doesn’t get it. Neither do onlyTrumpers.

View attachment 8310

Imagine being 50 points behind lard ass

Go ahead and stroke out loser

DeSanctimonious should, on paper, be able to wipe the floor with Bad Hair Trump. Better education, better looking, better athlete, way better hair. All those 5 stars, and what does he have to show for it? Embarrassing. Even with the @Oregonbros backing him, he has failed miserably.

He's an inauthentic politician. Which is exactly what people are done with. Sold any ounce of credibility he had down the river when he joined up with the neocons.

Lol btw, when the fuck did big government neocons like @46XiJCAB quook convince themselves that they were the "true" conservatives.

 

[PurpleJ]

RDS isn’t a national candidate and never has been. He’s just a useful idiot for the DNC. HTH.

So you’re giving Sled a run for his money? We Conservatives don’t take these types of idiotic statements seriously. Laura Loomer level stuff.

Be better.

Sleddy at least is a man of his convictions and has a better moral compass than you and the rest of the @oregonbros, a fact that is beyond question.

You favor murdering children for social convenience, while Sleddy stands firm. At least Trump brought in the justices to start a correction of that problem, though to date they've take a mere half-measure "states rights" approach. Anyway, @Sledog > @Oregonbros, and it's not close.

@Sledog @MikeDamone

I would say states rights is full measure as far as the constitution is concerned. The rest, however, is very much salient.

 

[creepycoug]

RDS isn’t a national candidate and never has been. He’s just a useful idiot for the DNC. HTH.

So you’re giving Sled a run for his money? We Conservatives don’t take these types of idiotic statements seriously. Laura Loomer level stuff.

Be better.

Sleddy at least is a man of his convictions and has a better moral compass than you and the rest of the @oregonbros, a fact that is beyond question.

You favor murdering children for social convenience, while Sleddy stands firm. At least Trump brought in the justices to start a correction of that problem, though to date they've take a mere half-measure "states rights" approach. Anyway, @Sledog > @Oregonbros, and it's not close.

@Sledog @MikeDamone

I would say states rights is full measure as far as the constitution is concerned. The rest, however, is very much salient.

Push for a constitutional amendment. Pending that, cook up a decision based on stari decisis. They've invented rights out of whole cloth using that approach. Shouldn't be hard to decide a case and conclude that somewhere in the constitution, as currently written, there is a right to not be murdered that crosses state boundaries. Do this while you're waiting for the amendment that will never come.

Or, like before, let's fight a fucking war over it. Need the right Prez though, and nobody on the horizon has Lincoln's ballz.

 

[creepycoug]

So Israeli officials not happy with Trump’s buffoonish comments. Shocking.

And as usual Lard Ass issues a statement saying how much he supports Israel and no President has done more for the Jews.

I’m sure this worked whenever he cheated on one of his wives, it was all good after he told them “nobody loves you more (insert name here).”

Like I said, he’s a buffoon and embarrassment. He just doesn’t get it. Neither do onlyTrumpers.

View attachment 8310

Imagine being 50 points behind lard ass

Go ahead and stroke out loser

DeSanctimonious should, on paper, be able to wipe the floor with Bad Hair Trump. Better education, better looking, better athlete, way better hair. All those 5 stars, and what does he have to show for it? Embarrassing. Even with the @Oregonbros backing him, he has failed miserably.

He's an inauthentic politician. Which is exactly what people are done with. Sold any ounce of credibility he had down the river when he joined up with the neocons.

Lol btw, when the fuck did big government neocons like @46XiJCAB quook convince themselves that they were the "true" conservatives.[/b]

The @Oregonbros are a goofy bunch. They? also convinced themselves that they're winning tomorrow. A more delusional group of men I don't know.

 

[46XiJCAB]

So Israeli officials not happy with Trump’s buffoonish comments. Shocking.

And as usual Lard Ass issues a statement saying how much he supports Israel and no President has done more for the Jews.

I’m sure this worked whenever he cheated on one of his wives, it was all good after he told them “nobody loves you more (insert name here).”

Like I said, he’s a buffoon and embarrassment. He just doesn’t get it. Neither do onlyTrumpers.

View attachment 8310

Imagine being 50 points behind lard ass

Go ahead and stroke out loser

DeSanctimonious should, on paper, be able to wipe the floor with Bad Hair Trump. Better education, better looking, better athlete, way better hair. All those 5 stars, and what does he have to show for it? Embarrassing. Even with the @Oregonbros backing him, he has failed miserably.

He's an inauthentic politician. Which is exactly what people are done with. Sold any ounce of credibility he had down the river when he joined up with the neocons.

Lol btw, when the fuck did big government neocons like @46XiJCAB quook convince themselves that they were the "true" conservatives.

“neocons!”

RDS is the only conservative in the race.

HTH.

 

[UW_Doog_Bot]

RDS isn’t a national candidate and never has been. He’s just a useful idiot for the DNC. HTH.

So you’re giving Sled a run for his money? We Conservatives don’t take these types of idiotic statements seriously. Laura Loomer level stuff.

Be better.

Sleddy at least is a man of his convictions and has a better moral compass than you and the rest of the @oregonbros, a fact that is beyond question.

You favor murdering children for social convenience, while Sleddy stands firm. At least Trump brought in the justices to start a correction of that problem, though to date they've take a mere half-measure "states rights" approach. Anyway, @Sledog > @Oregonbros, and it's not close.

@Sledog @MikeDamone

I would say states rights is full measure as far as the constitution is concerned. The rest, however, is very much salient.

Push for a constitutional amendment. Pending that, cook up a decision based on stari decisis. They've invented rights out of whole cloth using that approach. Shouldn't be hard to decide a case and conclude that somewhere in the constitution, as currently written, there is a right to not be murdered that crosses state boundaries. Do this while you're waiting for the amendment that will never come.

Or, like before, let's fight a fucking war over it. Need the right Prez though, and nobody on the horizon has Lincoln's ballz.

We? As Constitutionalists are supposed to be better? Than the God forsaken leftists. Rule of law and all that.

That said, there's precedent for "violating civil rights" being prosecutable by the fed and arguably all people regardless of age have civil rights.

I'm personally against such an approach as we have hashed out before but the irony of civil rights law and fed power being turned on its head for a conservative cause would be pretty hilarious. Good for the gander...

I shouldn't be giving my tio @creepycoug ideas.

 

[46XiJCAB]

RDS isn’t a national candidate and never has been. He’s just a useful idiot for the DNC. HTH.

So you’re giving Sled a run for his money? We Conservatives don’t take these types of idiotic statements seriously. Laura Loomer level stuff.

Be better.

Sleddy at least is a man of his convictions and has a better moral compass than you and the rest of the @oregonbros, a fact that is beyond question.

You favor murdering children for social convenience, while Sleddy stands firm. At least Trump brought in the justices to start a correction of that problem, though to date they've take a mere half-measure "states rights" approach. Anyway, @Sledog > @Oregonbros, and it's not close.

@Sledog @MikeDamone

WTF are you talking about? I wouldn’t be supporting RDS if I favored “murdering” babies.

You can go ahead and admit you just lied about me and where I stand on abortion. Apparently you’ve missed my past interactions with Dazzler on the topic of PP.

Sled is a parrot.

Facts are hard.

 

[PurpleJ]

RDS isn’t a national candidate and never has been. He’s just a useful idiot for the DNC. HTH.

So you’re giving Sled a run for his money? We Conservatives don’t take these types of idiotic statements seriously. Laura Loomer level stuff.

Be better.

Sleddy at least is a man of his convictions and has a better moral compass than you and the rest of the @oregonbros, a fact that is beyond question.

You favor murdering children for social convenience, while Sleddy stands firm. At least Trump brought in the justices to start a correction of that problem, though to date they've take a mere half-measure "states rights" approach. Anyway, @Sledog > @Oregonbros, and it's not close.

@Sledog @MikeDamone

I would say states rights is full measure as far as the constitution is concerned. The rest, however, is very much salient.

Push for a constitutional amendment. Pending that, cook up a decision based on stari decisis. They've invented rights out of whole cloth using that approach. Shouldn't be hard to decide a case and conclude that somewhere in the constitution, as currently written, there is a right to not be murdered that crosses state boundaries. Do this while you're waiting for the amendment that will never come.

Or, like before, let's fight a fucking war over it. Need the right Prez though, and nobody on the horizon has Lincoln's ballz.

I’d start with life liberty and the pursuit of gayness but then you’re right back to where we are now with “but when does life start???” I say heartbeat. 8 weeks or so. Or as you said, we have a civil war. I prefer my civil wars to be over economic issues, though. Don’t give a shit about abortion either way. Just wanna murk some commies is all.

 

[creepycoug]

RDS isn’t a national candidate and never has been. He’s just a useful idiot for the DNC. HTH.

So you’re giving Sled a run for his money? We Conservatives don’t take these types of idiotic statements seriously. Laura Loomer level stuff.

Be better.

Sleddy at least is a man of his convictions and has a better moral compass than you and the rest of the @oregonbros, a fact that is beyond question.

You favor murdering children for social convenience, while Sleddy stands firm. At least Trump brought in the justices to start a correction of that problem, though to date they've take a mere half-measure "states rights" approach. Anyway, @Sledog > @Oregonbros, and it's not close.

@Sledog @MikeDamone

WTF are you talking about? I wouldn’t be supporting RDS if I favored “murdering” babies.

You can go ahead and admit you just lied about me and where I stand on abortion. Apparently you’ve missed my past interactions with Dazzler on the topic of PP.

Sled is a parrot.

Facts are hard.

If you don't hold, as @Sledog and I do, that it is a fundamental right rooted in the very fabric of the country's existence to not be murdered if you're not guilty of anything, as a fetus-child certainly cannot be, then you're on the wrong side of history.

Sleddy's convictions go beyond politics. If RDS has articulated an argument that jibes with mine, then I stand to be corrected.

Besides, shouldn't you and the bros be preparing for the anal assault that is soon to befall you?

 

[creepycoug]

RDS isn’t a national candidate and never has been. He’s just a useful idiot for the DNC. HTH.

So you’re giving Sled a run for his money? We Conservatives don’t take these types of idiotic statements seriously. Laura Loomer level stuff.

Be better.

Sleddy at least is a man of his convictions and has a better moral compass than you and the rest of the @oregonbros, a fact that is beyond question.

You favor murdering children for social convenience, while Sleddy stands firm. At least Trump brought in the justices to start a correction of that problem, though to date they've take a mere half-measure "states rights" approach. Anyway, @Sledog > @Oregonbros, and it's not close.

@Sledog @MikeDamone

I would say states rights is full measure as far as the constitution is concerned. The rest, however, is very much salient.

Push for a constitutional amendment. Pending that, cook up a decision based on stari decisis. They've invented rights out of whole cloth using that approach. Shouldn't be hard to decide a case and conclude that somewhere in the constitution, as currently written, there is a right to not be murdered that crosses state boundaries. Do this while you're waiting for the amendment that will never come.

Or, like before, let's fight a fucking war over it. Need the right Prez though, and nobody on the horizon has Lincoln's ballz.

I’d start with life liberty and the pursuit of gayness but then you’re right back to where we are now with “but when does life start???” I say heartbeat. 8 weeks or so. Or as you said, we have a civil war. I prefer my civil wars to be over economic issues, though. Don’t give a shit about abortion either way[/b]. Just wanna murk some commies is all.

Disappointed in you.

Life starts when it is conceived. Period. There is no other intellectually honest or thought-provoking point along the spectrum. The Catholics have it right.

 

[creepycoug]

RDS isn’t a national candidate and never has been. He’s just a useful idiot for the DNC. HTH.

So you’re giving Sled a run for his money? We Conservatives don’t take these types of idiotic statements seriously. Laura Loomer level stuff.

Be better.

Sleddy at least is a man of his convictions and has a better moral compass than you and the rest of the @oregonbros, a fact that is beyond question.

You favor murdering children for social convenience, while Sleddy stands firm. At least Trump brought in the justices to start a correction of that problem, though to date they've take a mere half-measure "states rights" approach. Anyway, @Sledog > @Oregonbros, and it's not close.

@Sledog @MikeDamone

I would say states rights is full measure as far as the constitution is concerned. The rest, however, is very much salient.

Push for a constitutional amendment. Pending that, cook up a decision based on stari decisis. They've invented rights out of whole cloth using that approach. Shouldn't be hard to decide a case and conclude that somewhere in the constitution, as currently written, there is a right to not be murdered that crosses state boundaries. Do this while you're waiting for the amendment that will never come.

Or, like before, let's fight a fucking war over it. Need the right Prez though, and nobody on the horizon has Lincoln's ballz.

We? As Constitutionalists are supposed to be better? Than the God forsaken leftists. Rule of law and all that.

That said, there's precedent for "violating civil rights" being prosecutable by the fed and arguably all people regardless of age have civil rights.

I'm personally against such an approach as we have hashed out before but the irony of civil rights law and fed power being turned on its head for a conservative cause would be pretty hilarious. Good for the gander...

I shouldn't be giving my tio @creepycoug ideas.[/b]

But you did. Going into the rotation.

 

[creepycoug]

So Israeli officials not happy with Trump’s buffoonish comments. Shocking.

And as usual Lard Ass issues a statement saying how much he supports Israel and no President has done more for the Jews.

I’m sure this worked whenever he cheated on one of his wives, it was all good after he told them “nobody loves you more (insert name here).”

Like I said, he’s a buffoon and embarrassment. He just doesn’t get it. Neither do onlyTrumpers.

View attachment 8310

Imagine being 50 points behind lard ass

Go ahead and stroke out loser

DeSanctimonious should, on paper, be able to wipe the floor with Bad Hair Trump. Better education, better looking, better athlete, way better hair. All those 5 stars, and what does he have to show for it? Embarrassing. Even with the @Oregonbros backing him, he has failed miserably.

He's an inauthentic politician. [/b]Which is exactly what people are done with. Sold any ounce of credibility he had down the river when he joined up with the neocons.

Lol btw, when the fuck did big government neocons like @46XiJCAB quook convince themselves that they were the "true" conservatives.

Don did/does do that very well - the un-politician.

 

[46XiJCAB]

RDS isn’t a national candidate and never has been. He’s just a useful idiot for the DNC. HTH.

So you’re giving Sled a run for his money? We Conservatives don’t take these types of idiotic statements seriously. Laura Loomer level stuff.

Be better.

Sleddy at least is a man of his convictions and has a better moral compass than you and the rest of the @oregonbros, a fact that is beyond question.

You favor murdering children for social convenience, while Sleddy stands firm. At least Trump brought in the justices to start a correction of that problem, though to date they've take a mere half-measure "states rights" approach. Anyway, @Sledog > @Oregonbros, and it's not close.

@Sledog @MikeDamone

WTF are you talking about? I wouldn’t be supporting RDS if I favored “murdering” babies.

You can go ahead and admit you just lied about me and where I stand on abortion. Apparently you’ve missed my past interactions with Dazzler on the topic of PP.

Sled is a parrot.

Facts are hard.

If you don't hold, as @Sledog and I do, that it is a fundamental right rooted in the very fabric of the country's existence to not be murdered if you're not guilty of anything, as a fetus-child certainly cannot be, then you're on the wrong side of history.

Sleddy's convictions go beyond politics. If RDS has articulated an argument that jibes with mine, then I stand to be corrected.

Besides, shouldn't you and the bros be preparing for the anal assault that is soon to befall you?

Just say you fucking lied and take the L.

Who’s your purity vote going too?

God isn’t on the ballot.

HTH.

 

[creepycoug]

RDS isn’t a national candidate and never has been. He’s just a useful idiot for the DNC. HTH.

So you’re giving Sled a run for his money? We Conservatives don’t take these types of idiotic statements seriously. Laura Loomer level stuff.

Be better.

Sleddy at least is a man of his convictions and has a better moral compass than you and the rest of the @oregonbros, a fact that is beyond question.

You favor murdering children for social convenience, while Sleddy stands firm. At least Trump brought in the justices to start a correction of that problem, though to date they've take a mere half-measure "states rights" approach. Anyway, @Sledog > @Oregonbros, and it's not close.

@Sledog @MikeDamone

WTF are you talking about? I wouldn’t be supporting RDS if I favored “murdering” babies.

You can go ahead and admit you just lied about me and where I stand on abortion. Apparently you’ve missed my past interactions with Dazzler on the topic of PP.

Sled is a parrot.

Facts are hard.

If you don't hold, as @Sledog and I do, that it is a fundamental right rooted in the very fabric of the country's existence to not be murdered if you're not guilty of anything, as a fetus-child certainly cannot be, then you're on the wrong side of history.

Sleddy's convictions go beyond politics. If RDS has articulated an argument that jibes with mine, then I stand to be corrected.

Besides, shouldn't you and the bros be preparing for the anal assault that is soon to befall you?

Just say you fucking lied and take the L.

No.

Unless you tell me that state's rights is barely a half-measure and that outright bans on abortion in all circumstances should be the law of the land and not subject to the vagaries of the state legislature. And I'm still waiting for the RDS claim. Like I said, stand to be corrected on that too. It'll take more than "You're lying." The Tug already has someone who covers that particular response.

You won't, so I didn't lie. Prove me wrong.

 

[46XiJCAB]

RDS isn’t a national candidate and never has been. He’s just a useful idiot for the DNC. HTH.

So you’re giving Sled a run for his money? We Conservatives don’t take these types of idiotic statements seriously. Laura Loomer level stuff.

Be better.

Sleddy at least is a man of his convictions and has a better moral compass than you and the rest of the @oregonbros, a fact that is beyond question.

You favor murdering children for social convenience, while Sleddy stands firm. At least Trump brought in the justices to start a correction of that problem, though to date they've take a mere half-measure "states rights" approach. Anyway, @Sledog > @Oregonbros, and it's not close.

@Sledog @MikeDamone

WTF are you talking about? I wouldn’t be supporting RDS if I favored “murdering” babies.

You can go ahead and admit you just lied about me and where I stand on abortion. Apparently you’ve missed my past interactions with Dazzler on the topic of PP.

Sled is a parrot.

Facts are hard.

If you don't hold, as @Sledog and I do, that it is a fundamental right rooted in the very fabric of the country's existence to not be murdered if you're not guilty of anything, as a fetus-child certainly cannot be, then you're on the wrong side of history.

Sleddy's convictions go beyond politics. If RDS has articulated an argument that jibes with mine, then I stand to be corrected.

Besides, shouldn't you and the bros be preparing for the anal assault that is soon to befall you?

Just say you fucking lied and take the L.

No.

Unless you tell me that state's rights is barely a half-measure and that outright bans on abortion in all circumstances should be the law of the land and not subject to the vagaries of the state legislature. And I'm still waiting for the RDS claim. Like I said, stand to be corrected on that too. It'll take more than "You're lying." The Tug already has someone who covers that particular response.

You won't, so I didn't lie. Prove me wrong.

Who is your purity vote going to?

It’s a simple question.

Sled is voting Trump.

Trump mocked RDS.

Take the L and walk away.

 

[RaceBannon]

RDS isn’t a national candidate and never has been. He’s just a useful idiot for the DNC. HTH.

So you’re giving Sled a run for his money? We Conservatives don’t take these types of idiotic statements seriously. Laura Loomer level stuff.

Be better.

Sleddy at least is a man of his convictions and has a better moral compass than you and the rest of the @oregonbros, a fact that is beyond question.

You favor murdering children for social convenience, while Sleddy stands firm. At least Trump brought in the justices to start a correction of that problem, though to date they've take a mere half-measure "states rights" approach. Anyway, @Sledog > @Oregonbros, and it's not close.

@Sledog @MikeDamone

WTF are you talking about? I wouldn’t be supporting RDS if I favored “murdering” babies.

You can go ahead and admit you just lied about me and where I stand on abortion. Apparently you’ve missed my past interactions with Dazzler on the topic of PP.

Sled is a parrot.

Facts are hard.

If you don't hold, as @Sledog and I do, that it is a fundamental right rooted in the very fabric of the country's existence to not be murdered if you're not guilty of anything, as a fetus-child certainly cannot be, then you're on the wrong side of history.

Sleddy's convictions go beyond politics. If RDS has articulated an argument that jibes with mine, then I stand to be corrected.

Besides, shouldn't you and the bros be preparing for the anal assault that is soon to befall you?

Just say you fucking lied and take the L.

No.

Unless you tell me that state's rights is barely a half-measure and that outright bans on abortion in all circumstances should be the law of the land and not subject to the vagaries of the state legislature. And I'm still waiting for the RDS claim. Like I said, stand to be corrected on that too. It'll take more than "You're lying." The Tug already has someone who covers that particular response.

You won't, so I didn't lie. Prove me wrong.

Who is your purity vote going to?

It’s a simple question.

Sled is voting Trump.

Trump mocked RDS.

Take the L and walk away[/b].

Ironic

 

[creepycoug]

RDS isn’t a national candidate and never has been. He’s just a useful idiot for the DNC. HTH.

So you’re giving Sled a run for his money? We Conservatives don’t take these types of idiotic statements seriously. Laura Loomer level stuff.

Be better.

Sleddy at least is a man of his convictions and has a better moral compass than you and the rest of the @oregonbros, a fact that is beyond question.

You favor murdering children for social convenience, while Sleddy stands firm. At least Trump brought in the justices to start a correction of that problem, though to date they've take a mere half-measure "states rights" approach. Anyway, @Sledog > @Oregonbros, and it's not close.

@Sledog @MikeDamone

WTF are you talking about? I wouldn’t be supporting RDS if I favored “murdering” babies.

You can go ahead and admit you just lied about me and where I stand on abortion. Apparently you’ve missed my past interactions with Dazzler on the topic of PP.

Sled is a parrot.

Facts are hard.

If you don't hold, as @Sledog and I do, that it is a fundamental right rooted in the very fabric of the country's existence to not be murdered if you're not guilty of anything, as a fetus-child certainly cannot be, then you're on the wrong side of history.

Sleddy's convictions go beyond politics. If RDS has articulated an argument that jibes with mine, then I stand to be corrected.

Besides, shouldn't you and the bros be preparing for the anal assault that is soon to befall you?

Just say you fucking lied and take the L.

No.

Unless you tell me that state's rights is barely a half-measure and that outright bans on abortion in all circumstances should be the law of the land and not subject to the vagaries of the state legislature. And I'm still waiting for the RDS claim. Like I said, stand to be corrected on that too. It'll take more than "You're lying." The Tug already has someone who covers that particular response.

You won't, so I didn't lie. Prove me wrong.

Who is your purity vote going to?

It’s a simple question.

Sled is voting Trump.

Trump mocked RDS.

Take the L and walk away.

You're playing checkers, I chess.

You're talking about politics and voting. @Sledog and I are on a higher level. We're talking moral philosophy while you're defending a failed Florida politician. We're talking constitutional theory while chasing @RaceBannon around the universe trying to convince him to like your guy who fucked it up with a roster of 5 stars. Fucking great hair, fucking governor of fucking Florida, fucking real Ivy League education, D1 athlete, no porn star skeletons. Like Hillary, it was his to lose. He's managing to do that. But I'm not arguing politics. Read my post again, this time for comprehension.

Also, your coach sucks.

 

[Sledog]

RDS isn’t a national candidate and never has been. He’s just a useful idiot for the DNC. HTH.

So you’re giving Sled a run for his money? We Conservatives don’t take these types of idiotic statements seriously. Laura Loomer level stuff.

Be better.

Sleddy at least is a man of his convictions and has a better moral compass than you and the rest of the @oregonbros, a fact that is beyond question.

You favor murdering children for social convenience, while Sleddy stands firm. At least Trump brought in the justices to start a correction of that problem, though to date they've take a mere half-measure "states rights" approach. Anyway, @Sledog > @Oregonbros, and it's not close.

@Sledog @MikeDamone

WTF are you talking about? I wouldn’t be supporting RDS if I favored “murdering” babies.

You can go ahead and admit you just lied about me and where I stand on abortion. Apparently you’ve missed my past interactions with Dazzler on the topic of PP.

Sled is a parrot.

Facts are hard.

If you don't hold, as @Sledog and I do, that it is a fundamental right rooted in the very fabric of the country's existence to not be murdered if you're not guilty of anything, as a fetus-child certainly cannot be, then you're on the wrong side of history.

Sleddy's convictions go beyond politics. If RDS has articulated an argument that jibes with mine, then I stand to be corrected.

Besides, shouldn't you and the bros be preparing for the anal assault that is soon to befall you?

Just say you fucking lied and take the L.

Who’s your purity vote going too?

God isn’t on the ballot.

HTH.

God's on the ballot! Bigly! If you don't think anyone who believes in God can't see all this criminal and deviant behavior I have news for you. They see it and they are turning out podcasts and sermons to wake them all up. And trust me they are waking up! They will bring the pain to the demonrats and the deep state.

 

[Sledog]

RDS isn’t a national candidate and never has been. He’s just a useful idiot for the DNC. HTH.

So you’re giving Sled a run for his money? We Conservatives don’t take these types of idiotic statements seriously. Laura Loomer level stuff.

Be better.

Sleddy at least is a man of his convictions and has a better moral compass than you and the rest of the @oregonbros, a fact that is beyond question.

You favor murdering children for social convenience, while Sleddy stands firm. At least Trump brought in the justices to start a correction of that problem, though to date they've take a mere half-measure "states rights" approach. Anyway, @Sledog > @Oregonbros, and it's not close.

@Sledog @MikeDamone

WTF are you talking about? I wouldn’t be supporting RDS if I favored “murdering” babies.

You can go ahead and admit you just lied about me and where I stand on abortion. Apparently you’ve missed my past interactions with Dazzler on the topic of PP.

Sled is a parrot.

Facts are hard.

If you don't hold, as @Sledog and I do, that it is a fundamental right rooted in the very fabric of the country's existence to not be murdered if you're not guilty of anything, as a fetus-child certainly cannot be, then you're on the wrong side of history.

Sleddy's convictions go beyond politics. If RDS has articulated an argument that jibes with mine, then I stand to be corrected.

Besides, shouldn't you and the bros be preparing for the anal assault that is soon to befall you?

Just say you fucking lied and take the L.

No.

Unless you tell me that state's rights is barely a half-measure and that outright bans on abortion in all circumstances should be the law of the land and not subject to the vagaries of the state legislature. And I'm still waiting for the RDS claim. Like I said, stand to be corrected on that too. It'll take more than "You're lying." The Tug already has someone who covers that particular response.

You won't, so I didn't lie. Prove me wrong.

Who is your purity vote going to?

It’s a simple question.

Sled is voting Trump.

Trump mocked RDS.

Take the L and walk away.

Dude your guy is done. Stick a fork in him. I have said I will vote for the repub nominee and that's gonna be trump by a massive margin.

So what are you gonna do Mr. Republican? Who you gonna vote for? You haven't answered.