You guys are dumb. You took Herr Dazzlers Ad Hominem bait. Look at the case. She made the right call based on the facts presented to her.
Herr Dazzler and his merry band of dancing girls only attack the person when then have nothing of substance to use as a counter argument.
Fair point. I should have stayed on topic.
He has yet to even comment on whether the ruling is correct. I've no doubt he's ignored all facts, read "Trump appointee" and assumed the worst.
"Assumed the worst" implies that I feel strongly about the outcome. I don't.
She wrote a solid opinion, sitting as an appellate court due to the procedural posture of the case. I think she's probably right just as a matter of construing the language at issue.
Still, there's no way a lawyer who never tried a case should be able to become a trial judge.
But she is gorgeous[/b][/i].