46XiJCAB
New Fish
I wonder if he would have been released if he killed a black teenager at a BLM rally?
It just might[/b][/i] depend on what he was charged with.
Fuck off
thank you for your serviceI wonder if he would have been released if he killed a black teenager at a BLM rally?
It just might[/b][/i] depend on what he was charged with.
Fuck off
Dazzler walks off humming, "There goes my hero, watch him as he goes." Dazzler loves himself some leftard criminals. Now we know that he doesn't support violent crime, it's just not a voting issue for him.
So, they should just hold him because of your very strong feelings.
He's been charged and allowed to post a bond. It's the law.
Yup, it's not like he tried to overthrow our DeMoCrAcY and ended up rotting in a DC hellhole because the Gov't can torture you if they so desire.
He only killed a kid, allegedly, with his SUV. No biggie.
Again, Fuck off you hypocrite.
Write your North Dakota legislator.
Meantime . . .
He hasn't been charged with murder.
Do try to keep up.
Hey Dazzler you good with those rotting in a DC hellhole not being allowed bail?
None are charged with MURDER!
What this kunt act folks.
The insurrectionists aren't being held pursuant to North Dakota law. If whacky left-wing North Dakota want to have lenient, liberal rules, that's states' rights ain't it?
This isn't about ND.
You were for federalism before you were against it.
An honest person could answer the question.
Case closed.
I win, again.
I have zero issue with the few particularly violent insurrectionists being held without bail. Which is what's happened.
What have they been charged with to deny them bail? Anything less than MURDER isn't sufficient.
Mr. law and order. LOL.................
Last edited: