"Unbiased" Peach Bowl Preview ...

Here is a simple, quick analysis. This game, like all others, comes down to the trenches. If Washington can keep Anderson, Williams, Payne, Tomlinson and Allen from living in the backfield, Washington will be able to move the ball and better control the game. The same goes for Alabama. If they can own the trenches on offense, they can better move the ball and control the clock and dictate what Washington has to do defensively and offensively. Simple

Totally agree!!! We? average a weight of 332 across the line, and they are ready to dominate the line of scrimmage. MacGeary, Tray Adams, Center, Ossai, Bulyca. These boys have an attitude and are ready to rumble!!!

Our offensive line is pretty stout too. They are strong and quick. The true indicator will be the speed of Washington's defensive line. Being big is good, but you need the speed to go along with it

Agree with you 100% my friend. Speed, speed, speed. this is the fastest team Washington has had this century, maybe since 1991! John Ross XIV, Charlie McClutchins, Dwayne Warshington, Azeem Victor, Buttah Baker, Grayson Gunheim, Johnny Durocher, Cody Burns, Ossai, etc. The newbies will be inexperienced but we bring a new dimension that the program has not had in years, speed.
 
Can I citrus bomb this thread yet?

Yes

Lemonparty+Jesus.jpg
 
It's the worst game UW played all year by a wide margin ... in the long run, probably good for them to have gone through it

Honest question, not being a dick.

Isn't it somewhat telling that the "worst game UW played all year" coincided with the only really good team you played all year? This isn't an "SEC good, PAC bad" comment, as Bama played their share of turds this season. But you only faced one good team this year (no Colorado doesn't count).

I ask this because we're having a really hard time giving this UW team proper context. Like 2014 Ohio St, it's so hard to know who this team is because on one hand, your schedule was seriously trash...on the other hand, you wrecked your entire schedule. People don't understand how hard it is to play a 13 game schedule and have 1 loss and one other game that was at all in doubt.

You can't help that other teams on your schedule sucked. All you could do is go out and take care of business. But the showing against USC would have me wondering if that game was the result of finally playing a good team and that's who UW really is, or if it was just a bad day.

I tend to think it's the latter, it's just so hard to tell.

Not a dick question at all ...

I look at things from the perspective of what caused the breakdowns? Was it a talent issue? Or was it an execution issue?

When I see fundamental issues w Washington's RG position or perhaps plugging holes at OLB that to me is a talent issue that you may not be able to scheme around.

When looking at poor game planning, bad fundamentals, not getting the right drops in coverage, not coming back to balls leading to INTs, forcing throws, etc ... those are really correctable to me.

The SC game had a lot more of the latter than the former
 
You guys do realize this is basically a home game for Bama don't you?

No clue until you mentioned it.

We all thought Atlanta was in Idaho. Just like you all thought Warshington was Southern Alaska until you found HHB.

But tell me again how the CFB called this a neutral site matchup?
 
Not a dick question at all ...

I look at things from the perspective of what caused the breakdowns? Was it a talent issue? Or was it an execution issue?

When I see fundamental issues w Washington's RG position or perhaps plugging holes at OLB that to me is a talent issue that you may not be able to scheme around.

When looking at poor game planning, bad fundamentals, not getting the right drops in coverage, not coming back to balls leading to INTs, forcing throws, etc ... those are really correctable to me.

The SC game had a lot more of the latter than the former

So, you mentioned game planning, the game was 17-13 heading into the 4th. And yes, you only had 0.6 YPC for the game, but almost all of that was due to sacks.

Why did UW abandon the run almost completely? Chico had one carry, Gaskin 15. But the most criminal of offenses was Coleman with only 2 carries. He's the type of runner that could actually do well against USC.

What happened there?

 
Jonathan Smith - everything Alabama fans feel about Kiffin we feel about Smith

The sum total hatred in the hearts of all the bigoted Alabama fans in the world does not come close to the ire I feel towards Jonathan Smith on a benevolent day.
 
Jonathan Smith - everything Alabama fans feel about Kiffin we feel about Smith

Maybe y'all should have the bus leave without him too. At least our coaching staff actively trolls Kiffin. So there's some satisfaction.
 
You guys do realize this is basically a home game for Bama don't you?

Because Bama doesn't lose at home right?

From 2011 forward, Alabama has lost 3 home games, 2 at neutral sites (both in New Orleans), and 2 on the road.
 
Because Bama doesn't lose at home right?

From 2011 forward, Alabama has lost 3 home games, 2 at neutral sites (both in New Orleans), and 2 on the road.

If a UW team loses at Husky Stadium and nobody's there to see it, does it count? Ayooooo.

 
Not a dick question at all ...

I look at things from the perspective of what caused the breakdowns? Was it a talent issue? Or was it an execution issue?

When I see fundamental issues w Washington's RG position or perhaps plugging holes at OLB that to me is a talent issue that you may not be able to scheme around.

When looking at poor game planning, bad fundamentals, not getting the right drops in coverage, not coming back to balls leading to INTs, forcing throws, etc ... those are really correctable to me.

The SC game had a lot more of the latter than the former

So, you mentioned game planning, the game was 17-13 heading into the 4th. And yes, you only had 0.6 YPC for the game, but almost all of that was due to sacks.

Why did UW abandon the run almost completely? Chico had one carry, Gaskin 15. But the most criminal of offenses was Coleman with only 2 carries. He's the type of runner that could actually do well against USC.

What happened there?

You've stumbled upon the biggest chink in the armor:

e878d84889e8568f1427651b2034be.jpg
 
Jonathan Smith - everything Alabama fans feel about Kiffin we feel about Smith

The sum total hatred in the hearts of all the bigoted Alabama fans in the world does not come close to the ire I feel towards Jonathan Smith on a benevolent day.

Cute post but stereotyping Alabama with a 50's era narrative is progressive SJW bullshit.
 
Back
Top