Ummmm... What's This?

[DerekJohnson]

 

[Bob_C]

Perfectly normal to take a picture of you dropping in like 9 ballots into a dropbox. Election denier if you think otherwise.

 

[HHusky]

oh no

 

[46XiJCAB]

So the bundled ballots don’t draw any suspicion when they arrive to be counted by Hobbs people?

 

[HHusky]

Arizona law provides for a family member, household member, or caregiver of the voter to collect voted or unvoted early ballots from another person. [/i]

 

[Bob_C]

Arizona law provides for a family member, household member, or caregiver of the voter to collect voted or unvoted early ballots from another person. [/i]

That’s why I said it’s normal to turn in stacks of ballots.

 

[HHusky]

Arizona law provides for a family member, household member, or caregiver of the voter to collect voted or unvoted early ballots from another person. [/i]

That’s why I said it’s normal to turn in stacks of ballots.

stacks = more than one?

judges?

 

[TurdBomber]

Upon hearing Hobbs' catty, child-like voice, all Arizonans should be ashamed and embarrassed.

 

[HHusky]

I voted "a stack" again this year.

 

[Bob_C]

I voted "a stack" again this year.

Should look up definition of a stack.

 

[PurpleThrobber]

I voted "a stack" again this year.

Should look up definition of a stack.

Like they say, if you have to ask you probably can't afford it.

 

[HHusky]

I voted "a stack" again this year.

Should look up definition of a stack.

I wonder what kind of "stack" the staff at Ida Culver deliver every election year.

My "stack" has been four at times. More recently just two.

 

[Fire_Marshall_Bill]

Yeah I'm sure nobody abused the rule Dazzler

 

[Sources]

oh no

You do realize that being intentionally obtuse is not a counterpoint, right? You’re difficult for the sake of being difficult and only you fail to see what a dipshit that makes you.

 

[HHusky]

Yeah I'm sure nobody abused the rule Dazzler

So the law is unenforceable? Constitutionally void for vagueness? That can happen when you pass laws based on your very tender feelings.

 

[HHusky]

oh no

You do realize that being intentionally obtuse is not a counterpoint, right? You’re difficult for the sake of being difficult and only you fail to see what a dipshit that makes you.

In your own words, what did I fail to see?

 

[Fire_Marshall_Bill]

Yeah I'm sure nobody abused the rule Dazzler

So the law is unenforceable? Constitutionally void for vagueness? That can happen when you pass laws based on your very tender feelings.

The law is stupid

 

[HHusky]

oh no

You do realize that being intentionally obtuse is not a counterpoint, right? You’re difficult for the sake of being difficult and only you fail to see what a dipshit that makes you.

In your own words, what did I fail to see?

That’s what I thought.

 

[Sources]

oh no

You do realize that being intentionally obtuse is not a counterpoint, right? You’re difficult for the sake of being difficult and only you fail to see what a dipshit that makes you.

In your own words, what did I fail to see?

That’s what I thought.

Reading is hard, apparently. You fail to see that being obtuse doesn’t make you smart.

 

[HHusky]

oh no

You do realize that being intentionally obtuse is not a counterpoint, right? You’re difficult for the sake of being difficult and only you fail to see what a dipshit that makes you.

In your own words, what did I fail to see?

That’s what I thought.

Reading is hard, apparently. You fail to see that being obtuse doesn’t make you smart.

Obtuse has a meaning and you're ducking the question. What did I fail to observe in this "shocking" video?