UCLA Game Prediction

17-13 Dwags. This is the equivalent to a $1 Price Is Right guess.

I think it actually will be relatively low scoring.

Uw has almost never scored 50 on the road. Or even over 40. It would have to be a historically bad opponent, and ucla is not that.
 
UCLA is such a wild card. This could be one of those whoever wins the TO battle outright wins the game.

It's hard to imagine UCLA blowing UW out, but I could see bad Chip showing up and UW rolling. I guess I'd take UW -3.

Oops, wrong account. This is hard.

What about the time of possession battle? That could be the deciding factor. Or the penalty battle? That could be it too. Maybe it could be won in the trenches. Or maybe defense wins championships. Maybe who ever wants it the most will win. Thoughts?
 
UCLA is always a problem, however, I think DeBoner is a grown ass man coaching and our DL and backers are tough and physical enough where We? Neutralize DTR. This is the best I've ever felt about a game against UCLA. That said, we will probably lose rather easily, say 52 - 45

UCLA is always a problem
Stanford and the smirk always beats UW
We always lose to cal
The Arizona teams always have UWs number
Oregon owns UW.
Anything can happen in the Apple cup
That’s a GOOD Oregon state team….
 
UCLA is always a problem, however, I think DeBoner is a grown ass man coaching and our DL and backers are tough and physical enough where We? Neutralize DTR. This is the best I've ever felt about a game against UCLA. That said, we will probably lose rather easily, say 52 - 45

UCLA is always a problem
Stanford and the smirk always beats UW
We always lose to cal
The Arizona teams always have UWs number
Oregon owns UW.
Anything can happen in the Apple cup
That’s a GOOD Oregon state team….

Thanks Captain Obvious, now LEAVE!
 
DWAGS 45
LOSERS 31

iu

 
DWAGS 45
LOSERS 31

iu

I think on a good day it could be 45 21 my dwags but maybe 45 35.

Mostly, I don't see their defense being able to stop this offense. Just concerned about this defense's ability to handle a mobile qb.

Kind of reminds me of the Petermen Arizona game in that sense where it ended up being close against a not very good team just because of that one factor.
 
DWAGS 45
LOSERS 31

iu

I think on a good day it could be 45 21 my dwags but maybe 45 35.

Mostly, I don't see their defense being able to stop this offense. Just concerned about this defense's ability to handle a mobile qb.

Kind of reminds me of the Petermen Arizona game in that sense where it ended up being close against a not very good team just because of that one factor.

I think we'll need to score 35 - 40 points to win.
 
DWAGS 45
LOSERS 31

iu

I think on a good day it could be 45 21 my dwags but maybe 45 35.

Mostly, I don't see their defense being able to stop this offense. Just concerned about this defense's ability to handle a mobile qb.

Kind of reminds me of the Petermen Arizona game in that sense where it ended up being close against a not very good team just because of that one factor.

I think we'll need to score 35 - 40 points to win.

As much as I would rather see the DWAGS kick the shit out of Chipster a close high scoring game is probably better for the rankings of both teams moving forward.
 
DWAGS 45
LOSERS 31

iu

I think on a good day it could be 45 21 my dwags but maybe 45 35.

Mostly, I don't see their defense being able to stop this offense. Just concerned about this defense's ability to handle a mobile qb.

Kind of reminds me of the Petermen Arizona game in that sense where it ended up being close against a not very good team just because of that one factor.

I think we'll need to score 35 - 40 points to win.

As much as I would rather see the DWAGS kick the shit out of Chipster a close high scoring game is probably better for the rankings of both teams moving forward.

Uh oh. I sense playoff aspirations.
 
UCLA is always a problem, however, I think DeBoner is a grown ass man coaching and our DL and backers are tough and physical enough where We? Neutralize DTR. This is the best I've ever felt about a game against UCLA. That said, we will probably lose rather easily, say 52 - 45

UCLA is always a problem
Stanford and the smirk always beats UW
We always lose to cal
The Arizona teams always have UWs number
Oregon owns UW.
Anything can happen in the Apple cup
That’s a GOOD Oregon state team….

Thanks Captain Obvious, now LEAVE!

You LEAVE. I was mocking @thepenixmightier

Fuck off
 
DWAGS 45
LOSERS 31

iu

I think on a good day it could be 45 21 my dwags but maybe 45 35.

Mostly, I don't see their defense being able to stop this offense. Just concerned about this defense's ability to handle a mobile qb.

Kind of reminds me of the Petermen Arizona game in that sense where it ended up being close against a not very good team just because of that one factor.

I think we'll need to score 35 - 40 points to win.

As much as I would rather see the DWAGS kick the shit out of Chipster a close high scoring game is probably better for the rankings of both teams moving forward.

I reverse Doog now. Peak Yella Dooging was in your living room in Sept. 2019. That didn't end well.
 
DWAGS 45
LOSERS 31

iu

I think on a good day it could be 45 21 my dwags but maybe 45 35.

Mostly, I don't see their defense being able to stop this offense. Just concerned about this defense's ability to handle a mobile qb.

Kind of reminds me of the Petermen Arizona game in that sense where it ended up being close against a not very good team just because of that one factor.

I think we'll need to score 35 - 40 points to win.

As much as I would rather see the DWAGS kick the shit out of Chipster a close high scoring game is probably better for the rankings of both teams moving forward.

Uh oh. I sense playoff aspirations.

I guess you don't read my stuff.
 
Back
Top