One of many consequences for having a "high character" dementia addled moron play president while under the control of petulant deviant children. If we do run out of diesel we will be supremely fucked.
Heating oil now $7.00 a gallon in the NE. Average tank size in 275 gallons and lasts less than two months. I don't want to hear one person that voted for the dementia patient say a damn word about it costing more than a thousand dollars more to fill their tank.
Heating oil now $7.00 a gallon in the NE. Average tank size in 275 gallons and lasts less than two months. I don't want to hear one person that voted for the dementia patient say a damn word about it costing more than a thousand dollars more to fill their tank.
This "general tenor" of the show should then inform a viewer that he is not "stating actual facts" about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in "exaggeration" and "non-literal commentary." . . . Fox persuasively argues . . . that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer "arrivewith an appropriate amount of skepticism" about the statements he makes.[/i]
This "general tenor" of the show should then inform a viewer that he is not "stating actual facts" about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in "exaggeration" and "non-literal commentary." . . . Fox persuasively argues . . . that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer "arrivewith an appropriate amount of skepticism" about the statements he makes.[/i]
This "general tenor" of the show should then inform a viewer that he is not "stating actual facts" about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in "exaggeration" and "non-literal commentary." . . . Fox persuasively argues . . . that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer "arrivewith an appropriate amount of skepticism" about the statements he makes.[/i]
This "general tenor" of the show should then inform a viewer that he is not "stating actual facts" about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in "exaggeration" and "non-literal commentary." . . . Fox persuasively argues . . . that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer "arrivewith an appropriate amount of skepticism" about the statements he makes.[/i]
Homerun.
This "general tenor" of the show should then inform a viewer that he is not "stating actual facts" about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in "exaggeration" and "non-literal commentary." . . . Fox persuasively argues . . . that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer "arrivewith an appropriate amount of skepticism" about the statements he makes.[/i]
Homerun.
This "general tenor" of the show should then inform a viewer that he is not "stating actual facts" about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in "exaggeration" and "non-literal commentary." . . . Fox persuasively argues . . . that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer "arrivewith an appropriate amount of skepticism" about the statements he makes.[/i]
This "general tenor" of the show should then inform a viewer that he is not "stating actual facts" about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in "exaggeration" and "non-literal commentary." . . . Fox persuasively argues . . . that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer "arrivewith an appropriate amount of skepticism" about the statements he makes.[/i]
This "general tenor" of the show should then inform a viewer that he is not "stating actual facts" about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in "exaggeration" and "non-literal commentary." . . . Fox persuasively argues . . . that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer "arrivewith an appropriate amount of skepticism" about the statements he makes.[/i]
Homerun.
Cheap energy has been great for civilization. I for one want it to continue. I also don’t want 7 year old kids mining lithium.
This "general tenor" of the show should then inform a viewer that he is not "stating actual facts" about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in "exaggeration" and "non-literal commentary." . . . Fox persuasively argues . . . that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer "arrivewith an appropriate amount of skepticism" about the statements he makes.[/i]
Homerun.
This "general tenor" of the show should then inform a viewer that he is not "stating actual facts" about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in "exaggeration" and "non-literal commentary." . . . Fox persuasively argues . . . that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer "arrivewith an appropriate amount of skepticism" about the statements he makes.[/i]