Trying to decide how to feel.

[YellowSnow]

I went to sleep at halftime. That’s how I feel.

 

[DerekJohnson]

I went to sleep at halftime. That’s how I feel.

Tanned, rested and ready.

 

[CFetters_Nacho_Lover]

I went to sleep at halftime. That’s how I feel.

I was actually awake at kickoff watching the end of the Penn St-Ohio St game. I watched the UW game during commercials and then a Stanford series that resulted in Sirmon getting an interception. That was enough for me. Actually it was too much.

 

[BleachedAnusDawg]

Didn't watch a snap. 24 point loss to Oregon incoming that will reestablish the facts of how bad this team is. Look at the PAC standings if you want a good laugh; what a steaming pile the conference is. The only win that would indicate being an above average team is to beat Oregon. Going 5-4 in the PAC is equivalent to 1-7 in the SEC (Vandy).

 

[whlinder]

Still at a cumulative 0 plays watched this season. Fuck the Athletic Director

 

[chuck]

The weirdest part about this is if they beat whoregon they could still win the division/conference.

It won’t happen but this conference is a shit show.

Oregon is going to beat UW by 30+. It's a horrible matchup for the defense and we all know what the offense will do.

 

[lawsandl]

The line looks like it’s -7 Oregon with a 51.5 point total.

 

[chuck]

The line looks like it’s -7 Oregon with a 51.5 point total.

Easy money. If it stays single digits bet the farm.

I think I'd actually take the under. My call is 41-5 Oregon.

 

[Joey]

The line looks like it’s -7 Oregon with a 51.5 point total.

Say 34-17.5?

 

[EwaDawg]

The line looks like it’s -7 Oregon with a 51.5 point total.

Easy money. If it stays single digits bet the farm.

I think I'd actually take the under.[/i][/b] My call is 41-5 Oregon.

Agreed. Jimmy does not ever allow more than 34 points and UW likely wont score more than 17. You can let the dwags score more than that but they need to reduce what they let oregon score proportionately.

WTF. Yeah, I start typing before I finish thinking.

I can see winning the under, keeping jimmy's defensive streak alive, and getting blown out by meat as almost guaranteed.

Rather easily, in fact.

Script, anyone?

 

[Canadawg]

Didn't watch a snap. 24 point loss to Oregon incoming that will reestablish the facts of how bad this team is. Look at the PAC standings if you want a good laugh; what a steaming pile the conference is. The only win that would indicate being an above average team is to beat Oregon[/b]. Going 5-4 in the PAC is equivalent to 1-7 in the SEC (Vandy).

Furd beat Oregon

 

[lawsandl]

Didn't watch a snap. 24 point loss to Oregon incoming that will reestablish the facts of how bad this team is. Look at the PAC standings if you want a good laugh; what a steaming pile the conference is. The only win that would indicate being an above average team is to beat Oregon[/b]. Going 5-4 in the PAC is equivalent to 1-7 in the SEC (Vandy).

Furd beat Oregon

The Furd win comfortably last night with Tremayne and Humphries. There is a big gap between those two and the rest of the WRs. Higgins is better with those two on the field.

 

[lawsandl]

The line looks like it’s -7 Oregon with a 51.5 point total.

Easy money. If it stays single digits bet the farm.

I think I'd actually take the under. My call is 41-5 Oregon.

Oregon is holding no one to less than 10.

 

[WilburHooksHands]

The line looks like it’s -7 Oregon with a 51.5 point total.

Easy money. If it stays single digits bet the farm.

I think I'd actually take the under.[/i][/b] My call is 41-5 Oregon.

Agreed. Jimmy does not ever allow more than 34 points and UW likely wont score more than 17. You can let the dwags score more than that but they need to reduce what they let oregon score proportionately.

WTF. Yeah, I start typing before I finish thinking.

I can see winning the under, keeping jimmy's defensive streak alive, and getting blown out by meat as almost guaranteed.

Rather easily, in fact.

Script, anyone?

points streak ends here

 

[Canadawg]

Didn't watch a snap. 24 point loss to Oregon incoming that will reestablish the facts of how bad this team is. Look at the PAC standings if you want a good laugh; what a steaming pile the conference is. The only win that would indicate being an above average team is to beat Oregon[/b]. Going 5-4 in the PAC is equivalent to 1-7 in the SEC (Vandy).

Furd beat Oregon

The Furd win comfortably last night with Tremayne and Humphries. There is a big gap between those two and the rest of the WRs. Higgins is better with those two on the field.

Every team has injuries every game. The excuses didn't matter when we? were down all the starting WRs and they don't count now

 

[EwaDawg]

The line looks like it’s -7 Oregon with a 51.5 point total.

Easy money. If it stays single digits bet the farm.

I think I'd actually take the under.[/i][/b] My call is 41-5 Oregon.

Agreed. Jimmy does not ever allow more than 34 points and UW likely wont score more than 17. You can let the dwags score more than that but they need to reduce what they let oregon score proportionately.

WTF. Yeah, I start typing before I finish thinking.

I can see winning the under, keeping jimmy's defensive streak alive, and getting blown out by meat as almost guaranteed.

Rather easily, in fact.

Script, anyone?

points streak ends here

God, I hope so. What a worthless fucking stat.

 

[AtomicDawg]

I see a 35-10 loss but the crowd gives a standing o as they keep Oregon out of the end zone to preserve the streak of no 40 point games. So mission accomplished there.

 

[lawsandl]

Didn't watch a snap. 24 point loss to Oregon incoming that will reestablish the facts of how bad this team is. Look at the PAC standings if you want a good laugh; what a steaming pile the conference is. The only win that would indicate being an above average team is to beat Oregon[/b]. Going 5-4 in the PAC is equivalent to 1-7 in the SEC (Vandy).

Furd beat Oregon

The Furd win comfortably last night with Tremayne and Humphries. There is a big gap between those two and the rest of the WRs. Higgins is better with those two on the field.

Every team has injuries every game. The excuses didn't matter when we? were down all the starting WRs and they don't count now

Context matters though. That was a bad loss for Oregon. I wouldn’t have felt much better about the team (just the W) had Oregon came from behind to beat the Furd without Tremayne and Humphries.

 

[Canadawg]

Didn't watch a snap. 24 point loss to Oregon incoming that will reestablish the facts of how bad this team is. Look at the PAC standings if you want a good laugh; what a steaming pile the conference is. The only win that would indicate being an above average team is to beat Oregon[/b]. Going 5-4 in the PAC is equivalent to 1-7 in the SEC (Vandy).

Furd beat Oregon

The Furd win comfortably last night with Tremayne and Humphries. There is a big gap between those two and the rest of the WRs. Higgins is better with those two on the field.

Every team has injuries every game. The excuses didn't matter when we? were down all the starting WRs and they don't count now

Context matters though. That was a bad loss for Oregon. I wouldn’t have felt much better about the team (just the W) had Oregon came from behind to beat the Furd without Tremayne and Humphries.

Ok so when ducks win next week we will claim the win with the context that we? would have won with a better coach. You play the games so you don't have to debate which team is better

 

[lawsandl]

Didn't watch a snap. 24 point loss to Oregon incoming that will reestablish the facts of how bad this team is. Look at the PAC standings if you want a good laugh; what a steaming pile the conference is. The only win that would indicate being an above average team is to beat Oregon[/b]. Going 5-4 in the PAC is equivalent to 1-7 in the SEC (Vandy).

Furd beat Oregon

The Furd win comfortably last night with Tremayne and Humphries. There is a big gap between those two and the rest of the WRs. Higgins is better with those two on the field.

Every team has injuries every game. The excuses didn't matter when we? were down all the starting WRs and they don't count now

Context matters though. That was a bad loss for Oregon. I wouldn’t have felt much better about the team (just the W) had Oregon came from behind to beat the Furd without Tremayne and Humphries.

Ok so when ducks win next week we will claim the win with the context that we? would have won with a better coach. You play the games so you don't have to debate which team is better

UW and Oregon will play it out on the field. I am talking about looking at common opponents for prognostication.