CallMeBigErn
New Fish
You voted for Obama last election and will this time. Joe decides nothing on his own.Ok, ok, I’ll admit it. I won’t be voting for Hillary Clinton or Obama in this election because of the things from the BINGO card.
You voted for Obama last election and will this time. Joe decides nothing on his own.Ok, ok, I’ll admit it. I won’t be voting for Hillary Clinton or Obama in this election because of the things from the BINGO card.
You're an insufferable dipship.I'm pretty sure falsifying business records and disguising his reimbursement payments to Cohen as legal payments is what's in question. Guess we'll see what the court thinks soon.
Judge Juan Merchan ruled that the jury does not need to unanimously agree on the specific 'predicate' crime Donald Trump committed to convict him of felony-level falsification of business records. Legal experts, including Greta Van Susteren, have pointed to a Supreme Court case that contradicts this ruling.
Key Details:
Judge's Ruling: Judge Juan Merchan ruled that for a felony conviction, the jury need not unanimously agree on which specific crime Trump intended to cover up by falsifying business records.
Legal Precedent: Legal analyst Greta Van Susteren highlighted a Supreme Court case, Richardson v. United States, which emphasizes the need for jury unanimity on underlying offenses.
Defense Argument: Trump's defense argued for unanimity on the 'predicate' crime, but the prosecution maintained that the law does not require such agreement.
Diving Deeper:
In a significant ruling, Judge Juan Merchan determined that the jury in Donald Trump's hush money trial does not need to unanimously agree on the specific 'predicate' crime Trump allegedly committed to secure a conviction for felony-level falsification of business records. This decision plays a crucial role in the prosecution's strategy to elevate the charges against Trump.
According to the ruling, while the jury must unanimously agree that Trump falsified business documents to commit or conceal another crime, they do not need to concur on what that specific crime was. This ruling sparked controversy and drew criticism from legal experts, including Greta Van Susteren, who cited the Supreme Court case Richardson v. United States. In that 1999 case, the Court ruled that jurors must unanimously agree on the specific underlying offenses in a Continuing Criminal Enterprise (CCE) prosecution.
The prosecution initially presented four possible predicate crimes, o
Ooh, get what started?A large part of a Marxist/Totalitarianism takeover is to destroy the citizens’ faith in systems and norms.
I hope they convict Trump and demand him to custody immediately. Let’s get this started.
Guess Trump can do whatever he wants with no accountability. Jeezus Chris let him sleep with your wife, you’ll probably blame the Dems for that too.Ooh, get what started?A large part of a Marxist/Totalitarianism takeover is to destroy the citizens’ faith in systems and norms.
I hope they convict Trump and demand him to custody immediately. Let’s get this started.
Is the Manhattan Courthouse the Ft. Sumter of the Gravy Seals?
Ooh, get what started?A large part of a Marxist/Totalitarianism takeover is to destroy the citizens’ faith in systems and norms.
I hope they convict Trump and demand him to custody immediately. Let’s get this started.
Is the Manhattan Courthouse the Ft. Sumter of the Gravy Seals?
Jesus you two are shameless. Suck harder.Guess Trump can do whatever he wants with no accountability. Jeezus Chris let him sleep with your wife, you’ll probably blame the Dems for that too.Ooh, get what started?A large part of a Marxist/Totalitarianism takeover is to destroy the citizens’ faith in systems and norms.
I hope they convict Trump and demand him to custody immediately. Let’s get this started.
Is the Manhattan Courthouse the Ft. Sumter of the Gravy Seals?
Can we call this what this is? You didn’t like getting your ass handed to you on finance matters, now you’re taking it personal. Take it easy man. I already knew you didn’t know what you were talking about.Ooh, get what started?A large part of a Marxist/Totalitarianism takeover is to destroy the citizens’ faith in systems and norms.
I hope they convict Trump and demand him to custody immediately. Let’s get this started.
Is the Manhattan Courthouse the Ft. Sumter of the Gravy Seals?
Jesus you two are shameless. Suck harder.Guess Trump can do whatever he wants with no accountability. Jeezus Chris let him sleep with your wife, you’ll probably blame the Dems for that too.Ooh, get what started?A large part of a Marxist/Totalitarianism takeover is to destroy the citizens’ faith in systems and norms.
I hope they convict Trump and demand him to custody immediately. Let’s get this started.
Is the Manhattan Courthouse the Ft. Sumter of the Gravy Seals?
The jury will decide.What did Trump do?
Retarded response from a Retard.The jury will decide.What did Trump do?
I'm hearing he does whatever he wants without accountabilityThe jury will decide.What did Trump do?
I'm sure they will, that he's guilty no matter the evidence... this is new York afterall.The jury will decide.What did Trump do?