Trump tariffs ruled illegal

Still looking for any tax whatsoever that AOG has a problem with
Autstically repeating tariffs are a tax while throwing shit at the wall isn't that effective
 
UW_Doog_Bot said:
In a free and competitive global market tariffs would be paid by the consumer.
The global market isn't a free one. It is quite distorted.
It's also lopsidedly competitive with the US market demand being irreplaceable and global supply being hyper competitive.
That's pretty much what Trump is relying on, companies and nations will subsidize supply into the US market(as China has done for decades and Japan before them). If they won't someone else will.
You can argue the point of US consumer demand being irreplaceable but the mechanics of the tariff plan are sound.
Simply sticking to the "consumers pay tariffs" argument without acknowledging there's an economic basis for the counter argument is quite...simple.
Scott Besent passed economics 471 and 472 I'm sure.
Click to expand...
The minute Asian governments stop subsidizing their industries and currencies is when those governments are done for. I agree that they will keep doing it even if it means bigger and bigger losses.
 
Bob_C said:
UW_Doog_Bot said:
In a free and competitive global market tariffs would be paid by the consumer.
The global market isn't a free one. It is quite distorted.
It's also lopsidedly competitive with the US market demand being irreplaceable and global supply being hyper competitive.
That's pretty much what Trump is relying on, companies and nations will subsidize supply into the US market(as China has done for decades and Japan before them). If they won't someone else will.
You can argue the point of US consumer demand being irreplaceable but the mechanics of the tariff plan are sound.
Simply sticking to the "consumers pay tariffs" argument without acknowledging there's an economic basis for the counter argument is quite...simple.
Scott Besent passed economics 471 and 472 I'm sure.
Click to expand...
The minute Asian governments stop subsidizing their industries and currencies is when those governments are done for. I agree that they will keep doing it even if it means bigger and bigger losses.
Click to expand...
Much like Russia with Ukraine I'm ok watching the CCP go down in flames trying to recapture the former glory of TEMU.
 
UW_Doog_Bot said:
Bob_C said:
UW_Doog_Bot said:
In a free and competitive global market tariffs would be paid by the consumer.
The global market isn't a free one. It is quite distorted.
It's also lopsidedly competitive with the US market demand being irreplaceable and global supply being hyper competitive.
That's pretty much what Trump is relying on, companies and nations will subsidize supply into the US market(as China has done for decades and Japan before them). If they won't someone else will.
You can argue the point of US consumer demand being irreplaceable but the mechanics of the tariff plan are sound.
Simply sticking to the "consumers pay tariffs" argument without acknowledging there's an economic basis for the counter argument is quite...simple.
Scott Besent passed economics 471 and 472 I'm sure.
Click to expand...
The minute Asian governments stop subsidizing their industries and currencies is when those governments are done for. I agree that they will keep doing it even if it means bigger and bigger losses.
Click to expand...
Much like Russia with Ukraine I'm ok watching the CCP go down in flames trying to recapture the former glory of TEMU.
Click to expand...
how dare you!
 
Per Scott Besent of the 30% tariffs passed on China before, 0.07% of that cost was passed onto the consumer.
The plan is a baseline 10%, I think we can live with 0.02% added to inflation if it helps to resolve the deficit. Better than the Biden plan.
 
Bob_C said:
$2 trillion deficits are far more inflationary than tariffs.
Click to expand...

jjproxy-image.jpeg


Keep drinking the kool aid guys
 
Speaking of Jim Jones he was a big friend of Harvey Milk and Milk helped him recruit in the poor and black neighborhoods and helped Jim kill them all
As for you AOG you have several unanswered questions on the table and you continue to bleat that tariffs are taxes tariffs are taxes tariffs are taxes
Why would anyone take you seriously?
 
RaceBannon said:
Speaking of Jim Jones he was a big friend of Harvey Milk and Milk helped him recruit in the poor and black neighborhoods and helped Jim kill them all
As for you AOG you have several unanswered questions on the table and you continue to bleat that tariffs are taxes tariffs are taxes tariffs are taxes
Why would anyone take you seriously?
Click to expand...
Taken seriously on the Tug? Surely you jest.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top