Trump Guilty - 34 counts in sham trial

447301583-7926712857351395-8679191074344249285-n.jpg
 
HHusky said:
Sledog said:
HHusky said:
Falsifying business records to cover up another crime has been a low-level felony in NY since at least 1986. It has been prosecuted as a felony frequently since then. The TugCon girls apparently dislike NY law, but because of their enormous respect for federalism and the notion that states are "laboratories of democracy", they are quietly respecting NY's sovereign right to enact such laws and to prosecute their violation.
NAH, just kidding! These gals are squealing like stuck pigs!
Click to expand...
Bragg is using a federal law to make the jump and the feds refused to prosecute any of it. Bragg is not a fed. He doesn't try fed crimes. But then you're the lawyer! All fake all the tim. Demonrats that is.
Click to expand...
You're free to show us why NY cannot prosecute because the cover up involved federal crimes. I await your undoubtedly fascinating legal analysis.
Click to expand...
Which federal crime was Trump convicted of that had to be covered up by payment classification?
Fucking retard here.
 
According to legal genius @HHusky, Trump committed a state crime by covering up a federal crime that the DOJ never even prosecuted Trump for, let alone get a conviction.
You’re not an attorney, poseur.
 
When Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg first announced hush money charges against former President Donald Trump in March 2023, commentators were quick to cast doubt on the strength of the case. Among the criticisms leveled against Bragg from both right and left was that the district attorney’s office had simply resurrected a case already considered and abandoned by federal prosecutors in the Southern District of New York (SDNY), who had already investigated Trump and chosen not to bring charges against him under federal campaign finance law for the same scheme. “If anyone should have brought this case,” wrote law professor Jed Shugerman in the New York Times, it was the Justice Department. In the Washington Post, Ruth Marcus questioned whether Bragg could “transmogrify this conduct into a state crime” from its federal roots. On the right, Andrew McCarthy suggested in National Review that Bragg was “politically engineering” federal law “into a new election law of his very own.”
Why Did Federal Prosecutors Drop Trump's Hush Money Case?
 
Sledog said:
When Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg first announced hush money charges against former President Donald Trump in March 2023, commentators were quick to cast doubt on the strength of the case. Among the criticisms leveled against Bragg from both right and left was that the district attorney’s office had simply resurrected a case already considered and abandoned by federal prosecutors in the Southern District of New York (SDNY), who had already investigated Trump and chosen not to bring charges against him under federal campaign finance law for the same scheme. “If anyone should have brought this case,” https://www.nytimes.com/2023/04/05/opinion/trump-bragg-indictment.html in the New York Times, it was the Justice Department. In the Washington Post, https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2023/04/04/trump-indictment-unilluminating-leap/ whether Bragg could “transmogrify this conduct into a state crime” from its federal roots. On the right, Andrew McCarthy https://www.nationalreview.com/2024/03/bragg-falsifies-business-records-charges-against-trump/amp/ that Bragg was “politically engineering” federal law “into a new election law of his very own.”
Why Did Federal Prosecutors Drop Trump's Hush Money Case?
Click to expand...
So you meant the Feds didn't prosecute, which is a lot different than saying there were no crimes.
 
HHusky said:
Sledog said:
When Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg first announced hush money charges against former President Donald Trump in March 2023, commentators were quick to cast doubt on the strength of the case. Among the criticisms leveled against Bragg from both right and left was that the district attorney’s office had simply resurrected a case already considered and abandoned by federal prosecutors in the Southern District of New York (SDNY), who had already investigated Trump and chosen not to bring charges against him under federal campaign finance law for the same scheme. “If anyone should have brought this case,” https://www.nytimes.com/2023/04/05/opinion/trump-bragg-indictment.html in the New York Times, it was the Justice Department. In the Washington Post, https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2023/04/04/trump-indictment-unilluminating-leap/ whether Bragg could “transmogrify this conduct into a state crime” from its federal roots. On the right, Andrew McCarthy https://www.nationalreview.com/2024/03/bragg-falsifies-business-records-charges-against-trump/amp/ that Bragg was “politically engineering” federal law “into a new election law of his very own.”
Why Did Federal Prosecutors Drop Trump's Hush Money Case?
Click to expand...
So you meant the Feds didn't prosecute, which is a lot different than saying there were no crimes.
Click to expand...
Now do PIPS and the dementia patient. Or not. No testimony allowed on why the federal election law was not violated. Why was that? Stormy was allowed to testify on lots of things that weren't part of any of Trump's alleged crimes. No testimony on the crux of Trump's case. No reasonable doubt? Geezus.
 
Last edited:
WestlinnDuck said:
HHusky said:
Sledog said:
When Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg first announced hush money charges against former President Donald Trump in March 2023, commentators were quick to cast doubt on the strength of the case. Among the criticisms leveled against Bragg from both right and left was that the district attorney’s office had simply resurrected a case already considered and abandoned by federal prosecutors in the Southern District of New York (SDNY), who had already investigated Trump and chosen not to bring charges against him under federal campaign finance law for the same scheme. “If anyone should have brought this case,” https://www.nytimes.com/2023/04/05/opinion/trump-bragg-indictment.html in the New York Times, it was the Justice Department. In the Washington Post, https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2023/04/04/trump-indictment-unilluminating-leap/ whether Bragg could “transmogrify this conduct into a state crime” from its federal roots. On the right, Andrew McCarthy https://www.nationalreview.com/2024/03/bragg-falsifies-business-records-charges-against-trump/amp/ that Bragg was “politically engineering” federal law “into a new election law of his very own.”
Why Did Federal Prosecutors Drop Trump's Hush Money Case?
Click to expand...
So you meant the Feds didn't prosecute, which is a lot different than saying there were no crimes.
Click to expand...
Now do PIPS and the dementia patient. Or not.
Click to expand...
I'm not the one claiming the Feds declared anyone innocent, Gasbag.
 
Ah, but the feds did say they didn't have a case and no testimony was allowed. Unlike with PIPS and the dementia patient they did have a case but refused to prosecute because PIPS meant well and the dementia patient was a dementia patient. You suck at this.
 
WestlinnDuck said:
Ah, but the feds did say they didn't have a case and no testimony was allowed. Unlike with PIPS and the dementia patient they did have a case but refused to prosecute because PIPS meant well and the dementia patient was a dementia patient. You suck at this.
Click to expand...
Butterball killed the case at the federal level.
We do agree the federal crimes should have been prosecuted by the Feds.
But you gals need to explain why NY can't prosecute under their state law for covering up a federal crime.
 
Last edited:
HHusky said:
WestlinnDuck said:
Ah, but the feds did say they didn't have a case and no testimony was allowed. Unlike with PIPS and the dementia patient they did have a case but refused to prosecute because PIPS meant well and the dementia patient was a dementia patient. You suck at this.
Click to expand...
Butterball killed the case at the federal level.
We do agree the federal crimes should have been prosecuted by the Feds.
But you gals need to explain why NY can't prosecute under their state law for covering up a federal crime.
Click to expand...
What federal crime was Trump convicted?
 
PurpleThrobber said:
HHusky said:
WestlinnDuck said:
Ah, but the feds did say they didn't have a case and no testimony was allowed. Unlike with PIPS and the dementia patient they did have a case but refused to prosecute because PIPS meant well and the dementia patient was a dementia patient. You suck at this.
Click to expand...
Butterball killed the case at the federal level.
We do agree the federal crimes should have been prosecuted by the Feds.
But you gals need to explain why NY can't prosecute under their state law for covering up a federal crime.
Click to expand...
What federal crime was Trump convicted?
Click to expand...
The crime doesn't even have to have been successfully completed. Your question is irrelevant.
 
HHusky said:
PurpleThrobber said:
HHusky said:
WestlinnDuck said:
Ah, but the feds did say they didn't have a case and no testimony was allowed. Unlike with PIPS and the dementia patient they did have a case but refused to prosecute because PIPS meant well and the dementia patient was a dementia patient. You suck at this.
Click to expand...
Butterball killed the case at the federal level.
We do agree the federal crimes should have been prosecuted by the Feds.
But you gals need to explain why NY can't prosecute under their state law for covering up a federal crime.
Click to expand...
What federal crime was Trump convicted?
Click to expand...
The crime doesn't even have to have been successfully completed. Your question is irrelevant.
Click to expand...
You’re asking for child support before taking the pregnancy test.

You’re irrelevant.
 
Why didn’t they bring this heinous felony case in 2018, 2022, or 2022 and had to manipulate around the fact the crime was past the statute of limitations?
Totally legitimate. Start filing state charges against the 51 intelligence officers who conspired to influence the 2020 election with the “Russian disinformation” talking point.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top