He has twice the GOP voter support of DeSantis and he just needs to focus on promotion of conservative policies and attacking the dems. But no, Trump needs to support woke Disney and AB because he thinks that hurts DeSantis. Plus I wasn't aware that Trump is soft on the 2A. Geezus.
https://ace.mu.nu/

I was going to skip the Donald Trump, Jr. thing in the interests of blog peace.
Until Donald Trump himself made it clear that he's willing to side with leftwing woke corporations if it can help him defeat the man who is obviously his superior in every way.
Donald Trump, Jr. apparently got a call from Budweiser executives who mentioned to him that Anheuser-Busch donates to Republicans... and Trump.
As Michael Knowles points out, almost every corporation has given about evenly to both parties, "greasing the wheels" for a future time when they will need political favors. This doesn't make the corporations "conservative," particularly when they're giving to the parties evenly. Donald Trump, Jr. thinks it's amazeballs that Budweiser is giving "about 60%" to Republicans.
Even if that's true, okay, they're giving 60% to Republicans -- and then giving millions and millions in free transgender propaganda to the left.
This is a win? Cheap date "conservatives" destroy the movement.
Anheuser Busch is scrambling to lull conservatives back to sleep, but only with empty non-statements and empty visuals of Clydesdales and barns. Matt Walsh asks, why would we end the boycott now when it's obviously working, and we're experiencing the closest thing to a win we've seen in the corporate front of the Culture War?
Ah, but of course, if you're a born-and-bred liberal New Yorker, you're not interested in the Culture War. You think that's something that unfashionable Christians bother themselves with.
Then Donald Trump decided that he is willing to partner with the Disney Devil himself if it gets him just some juicy likes on Twitter "Truth" social. He agrees with all the liberals attacking DeSantis that his battle with Disney is merely "a political STUNT" and "unnecessary," because of course liberals always think it's unnecessary for conservatives to fight back in the Culture War.
Note that the Young Turks defend Trump there, too. They praise Trump for propsoing some "pretty reasonable" gun control laws.
It's almost as if they support the candidate they know the Democrats can beat or something.
Trump has in fact questioned why the GOP protects the AR-15 from an "assault weapon" ban, saying "I don't know why anyone needs an AR-15."
As president, Donald Trump privately pushed for banning AR-15-type rifles, according to a new report. Trump was -- and is -- a big defender of Second Amendment rights. So the new revelation is surprising that he tried to renew the "assault weapon" ban during his first two years in office.
The news about Trump is buried in a lengthy story in The Washinton Post on Monday about AR-15 style rifles. The report says he tried multiple times in 2018 and 2019 to get support for a federal "assault-weapon" ban.
In the summer of 2019, after back-to-back mass shootings in Dayton, Ohio, and El Paso involving an AR-15-style pistol and an AKM-style rifle, Trump told aides that he wanted to ban AR-15s, according to people present for the statements.
"I don't know why anyone needs an AR-15," Trump told aides as he flew on Marine One to the White House in August 2019, according to a person who heard his comments.
As one former official put it in describing the real estate developer turned politician, "His reflexes were a New York liberal on guns. He doesn't have knee-jerk conservative reflexes."
But Trump was also petrified of the NRA and others taking him on, former advisers said, and heard from a number of advisers that it would be unpopular. Trump ultimately stopped entertaining the idea of working with Democrats on gun control later that year, when he was caught in a scandal over his now-infamous phone call with Ukraine's president.
"F--- it, I'm not going to work with them on anything. They're f---ing impeaching me," Trump said in one Oval Office meeting, according to a participant.
https://ace.mu.nu/

I was going to skip the Donald Trump, Jr. thing in the interests of blog peace.
Until Donald Trump himself made it clear that he's willing to side with leftwing woke corporations if it can help him defeat the man who is obviously his superior in every way.
Donald Trump, Jr. apparently got a call from Budweiser executives who mentioned to him that Anheuser-Busch donates to Republicans... and Trump.
As Michael Knowles points out, almost every corporation has given about evenly to both parties, "greasing the wheels" for a future time when they will need political favors. This doesn't make the corporations "conservative," particularly when they're giving to the parties evenly. Donald Trump, Jr. thinks it's amazeballs that Budweiser is giving "about 60%" to Republicans.
Even if that's true, okay, they're giving 60% to Republicans -- and then giving millions and millions in free transgender propaganda to the left.
This is a win? Cheap date "conservatives" destroy the movement.
Anheuser Busch is scrambling to lull conservatives back to sleep, but only with empty non-statements and empty visuals of Clydesdales and barns. Matt Walsh asks, why would we end the boycott now when it's obviously working, and we're experiencing the closest thing to a win we've seen in the corporate front of the Culture War?
Ah, but of course, if you're a born-and-bred liberal New Yorker, you're not interested in the Culture War. You think that's something that unfashionable Christians bother themselves with.
Then Donald Trump decided that he is willing to partner with the Disney Devil himself if it gets him just some juicy likes on Twitter "Truth" social. He agrees with all the liberals attacking DeSantis that his battle with Disney is merely "a political STUNT" and "unnecessary," because of course liberals always think it's unnecessary for conservatives to fight back in the Culture War.

Note that the Young Turks defend Trump there, too. They praise Trump for propsoing some "pretty reasonable" gun control laws.
It's almost as if they support the candidate they know the Democrats can beat or something.
Trump has in fact questioned why the GOP protects the AR-15 from an "assault weapon" ban, saying "I don't know why anyone needs an AR-15."
As president, Donald Trump privately pushed for banning AR-15-type rifles, according to a new report. Trump was -- and is -- a big defender of Second Amendment rights. So the new revelation is surprising that he tried to renew the "assault weapon" ban during his first two years in office.
The news about Trump is buried in a lengthy story in The Washinton Post on Monday about AR-15 style rifles. The report says he tried multiple times in 2018 and 2019 to get support for a federal "assault-weapon" ban.
In the summer of 2019, after back-to-back mass shootings in Dayton, Ohio, and El Paso involving an AR-15-style pistol and an AKM-style rifle, Trump told aides that he wanted to ban AR-15s, according to people present for the statements.
"I don't know why anyone needs an AR-15," Trump told aides as he flew on Marine One to the White House in August 2019, according to a person who heard his comments.
As one former official put it in describing the real estate developer turned politician, "His reflexes were a New York liberal on guns. He doesn't have knee-jerk conservative reflexes."
But Trump was also petrified of the NRA and others taking him on, former advisers said, and heard from a number of advisers that it would be unpopular. Trump ultimately stopped entertaining the idea of working with Democrats on gun control later that year, when he was caught in a scandal over his now-infamous phone call with Ukraine's president.
"F--- it, I'm not going to work with them on anything. They're f---ing impeaching me," Trump said in one Oval Office meeting, according to a participant.