Torn between two lovers . . .

I realize that anything other than lockstep adherence to your leader is foreign to you but people disagree all the time if they aren't leftist scumbags

Hope this helps
 
Who cares?

Shapiro wasn't a Trump guy and didn't vote for him in 2016. He then tolerated him and supported many of his policies. He has been consistent in his criticism of how trump acted after the 2020 election. But you're pea brain thinks this is some big gotcha moment.
 
Last edited:
I realize that anything other than lockstep adherence to your leader is foreign to you but people disagree all the time if they aren't leftist scumbags

Hope this helps

But Ben's a squish, right?
 
“The documentary does not make the claim that I think a lot of people are attributing to the documentary,” Shapiro, who also had critiques for some of the fact-checkers, said. “In other words, the process is corrupt and people are violating the law in how they are moving these ballots, but that does not mean that the ballots are being cast by dead people or that they are being punched by somebody in the backroom somewhere.”

Shapiro argued more than cell phone data is needed to prove that “mules” were passing on fraudulent ballots in favor of Biden. He admitted his opinion might make “nobody happy,” considering his conservative audience.

I think the data is really interesting. I think that it’s really suspicious for sure. I think that it is dispositive that this alone shifted the election … or that the election was stolen in the sense that actual fraudulent ballots made the difference between victory and loss for Donald Trump in these states. I think the conclusions of the film are not justified by the premises of the film itself. There are a bunch of dots that need to be connected. Maybe they will be connected, but they haven’t been connected in the film.

Shapiro said he requires more data, but also noted there should be enough suspicious activity for law enforcement to look into the claims.[/i][/b]

I would agree with every word of this. Vote harvesting, which is illegal in most states is what won the election for Biden. Once the mail in ballots went out, the fix was in. Dazzler because he is a boot licking toady thinks all conservatives are the same.
 
Last edited:
I think the conclusions of the film are not justified by the premises of the film itself. There are a bunch of dots that need to be connected. Maybe they will be connected, but they haven’t been connected in the film.[/b]

ringing endorsement
 
I think the conclusions of the film are not justified by the premises of the film itself. There are a bunch of dots that need to be connected. Maybe they will be connected, but they haven’t been connected in the film.[/b]

ringing endorsement

So? Why would he endorse something he disagrees with, ma'am?
 
I think the conclusions of the film are not justified by the premises of the film itself. There are a bunch of dots that need to be connected. Maybe they will be connected, but they haven’t been connected in the film.[/b]

ringing endorsement

Shapiro supports cleaning up our voter rolls and voter ID and is in favor of a greater investigation into the ballot stuffing, just like you right Dazzler? Or does your "agreement" with Shapiro only go so far?
 
Last edited:
I think the conclusions of the film are not justified by the premises of the film itself. There are a bunch of dots that need to be connected. Maybe they will be connected, but they haven’t been connected in the film.[/b]

ringing endorsement

So? Why would he endorse something he disagrees with, ma'am?

Your argument is with several of the other gals on your team.
 
I think the conclusions of the film are not justified by the premises of the film itself. There are a bunch of dots that need to be connected. Maybe they will be connected, but they haven’t been connected in the film.[/b]

ringing endorsement

Shapiro supports cleaning up our voter rolls and voter ID and is in favor of a greater investigation into the ballot stuffing, just like you right Dazzler? Or does your "agreement" with Shapiro only go so far?

In much the same way that Mitch McConnell was for impeachment, except it was too late.

Courageous! (And try not to offend the wing nuts.)
 
I think the conclusions of the film are not justified by the premises of the film itself. There are a bunch of dots that need to be connected. Maybe they will be connected, but they haven’t been connected in the film.[/b]

ringing endorsement

Shapiro supports cleaning up our voter rolls and voter ID and is in favor of a greater investigation into the ballot stuffing, just like you right Dazzler? Or does your "agreement" with Shapiro only go so far?

In much the same way that Mitch McConnell was for impeachment, except it was too late.

Courageous! (And try not to offend the wing nuts.)

White flag
 
I think the conclusions of the film are not justified by the premises of the film itself. There are a bunch of dots that need to be connected. Maybe they will be connected, but they haven’t been connected in the film.[/b]

ringing endorsement

So? Why would he endorse something he disagrees with, ma'am?

Your argument is with several of the other gals on your team.

I have no team, ma'am.

I don't recall ever reading here that Shapiro was convinced the election was stolen or that he agrees with everything DD says. Unlike the leftists, they understand can come to different conclusions and have different opinions without calling each other names and freaking out like you ladies do.
 
I think the conclusions of the film are not justified by the premises of the film itself. There are a bunch of dots that need to be connected. Maybe they will be connected, but they haven’t been connected in the film.[/b]

ringing endorsement

So? Why would he endorse something he disagrees with, ma'am?

Your argument is with several of the other gals on your team.

I have no team, ma'am.

I don't recall ever reading here that Shapiro was convinced the election was stolen or that he agrees with everything DD says. Unlike the leftists, they understand can come to different conclusions and have different opinions without calling each other names and freaking out like you ladies do.

Little Ben's gonna get excommunicated at this rate.
 
I think the conclusions of the film are not justified by the premises of the film itself. There are a bunch of dots that need to be connected. Maybe they will be connected, but they haven’t been connected in the film.[/b]

ringing endorsement

So? Why would he endorse something he disagrees with, ma'am?

Your argument is with several of the other gals on your team.

I have no team, ma'am.

I don't recall ever reading here that Shapiro was convinced the election was stolen or that he agrees with everything DD says. Unlike the leftists, they understand can come to different conclusions and have different opinions without calling each other names and freaking out like you ladies do.

Little Ben's gonna get excommunicated at this rate.

For making a statement I agree with? This is about as solid as your claim that Obama was in on the Gentle Giant cover-up.
 
I think the conclusions of the film are not justified by the premises of the film itself. There are a bunch of dots that need to be connected. Maybe they will be connected, but they haven’t been connected in the film.[/b]

ringing endorsement

So? Why would he endorse something he disagrees with, ma'am?

Your argument is with several of the other gals on your team.

I have no team, ma'am.

I don't recall ever reading here that Shapiro was convinced the election was stolen or that he agrees with everything DD says. Unlike the leftists, they understand can come to different conclusions and have different opinions without calling each other names and freaking out like you ladies do.

Little Ben's gonna get excommunicated at this rate.

JFC. Like I said, you're boring, Sylvia
 
I think the conclusions of the film are not justified by the premises of the film itself. There are a bunch of dots that need to be connected. Maybe they will be connected, but they haven’t been connected in the film.[/b]

ringing endorsement

So? Why would he endorse something he disagrees with, ma'am?

Your argument is with several of the other gals on your team.

I have no team, ma'am.

I don't recall ever reading here that Shapiro was convinced the election was stolen or that he agrees with everything DD says. Unlike the leftists, they understand can come to different conclusions and have different opinions without calling each other names and freaking out like you ladies do.

Little Ben's gonna get excommunicated at this rate.

Lol you're spun bro
 
Oh NO! Two Conservatives disagree, stop the presses.

Dazzler, your guy is a fucking disaster. You put him there so you can fuck the fuck off with your BS deflections. Loser.

 
So? Why would he endorse something he disagrees with, ma'am? [/QUOTE]

Your argument is with several of the other gals on your team.[/QUOTE]

Several? There isn't one on this site who gives a shit what Shaprio thinks. It's his opinion and prerogative. The election was stolen and you can't stand that only freaks think the way you do.
 
Back
Top