That was their brand, and what made them legendary, imoSlight edge to Led Zeppelin over AC DC here. '73 is peak Zep I think you take that over peak AC DC, which '79 was.
VH as an oppening act for Sabbath is intriguing but Sabbath sucked by the late 70's to fuck that.
Queen sucks. So does Kis[/b]s.
Yes and yes. Ole Yella dropping truth bombs.
I love LZ like pretty much everyone, but really don't care for their live performances. Too self indulgent[/b] and not true enough to the studio recordings for my taste. Maybe if I was there though. Who knows?
Edit: If you were a rock act in 73 and not self indulgent, you were the. Carpenters…
Well, you're right but that made them legendary because people are stupid and have horrible taste.
Correctamundo…they were all self indulgent in the 60s/70s…the bands we still talk/argue about had (or acquired) chops and matured, while the rest are relegated to the cut-out bins of history…
I watched some video about Cream not long ago. Clapton said their live shows devolved into Bruce and Baker showing off and trying to one-up each other so much that he'd just quit playing and they wouldn't even notice.
I recall reading about when Clapton first hear Music From Big Pink, he was like fuck this Cream shit, I wanna play me some roots rock. He should have formed a group with JJ Cale.
Look how happy he is here playing with Johnny Cash and Carl Perkins.
Clapton taking a back seat and grinning ear to ear while Perkins shows how it's done is pretty cool.