It's a funny story actually...Trump probably exaggerated, but others have used old Washington Post articles and others to contradict the Washington Post's "fact-checker".
http://www.powerlineblog.com/archiv...t-checker-doesnt-read-the-washington-post.php
http://www.steynonline.com/7313/jersey-sure
So, again, good to see you being a lapdog for the left.
It's a funny story actually...Trump probably exaggerated, but others have used old Washington Post articles and others to contradict the Washington Post's "fact-checker".
http://www.powerlineblog.com/archiv...t-checker-doesnt-read-the-washington-post.php
http://www.steynonline.com/7313/jersey-sure
So, again, good to see you being a lapdog for the left.
You are totally grasping at straws. Given that your article says the exact same thing as my article.
And I'm the " lapdog ". That's funny shit.
It's a funny story actually...Trump probably exaggerated, but others have used old Washington Post articles and others to contradict the Washington Post's "fact-checker".
http://www.powerlineblog.com/archiv...t-checker-doesnt-read-the-washington-post.php
http://www.steynonline.com/7313/jersey-sure
So, again, good to see you being a lapdog for the left.
You are totally grasping at straws. Given that your article says the exact same thing as my article.
And I'm the " lapdog ". That's funny shit.
If you actually "read" those two links and came to that conclusion then you are even dumber than I thought, and I didn't think that was possible.
Congrats...HondoRFS...
Everything you read on the internet is true.
Everything you read on the internet is true.
Says the guy who links nonsense Yahoo "news" articles (including the one that started this thread) on a daily basis...HondoRFS...
Read the links (if you can...your previous comments suggest 'Reading is Hard')...they are pretty clear cut. I'm sure Trump exaggerated, but the media couldn't run with that story so they made stuff up and got caught doing it.
Keep fighting the good fight for Hillary...she'll need it. Nobody likes her, you aside...
No, it isn't, and the fact you cannot comprehend that is both funny and sad. The NYTs was shown to be plain wrong as cited by other previous NYTs, WP, and other articles, and the Washington Post guy has been walking back his claims for the last 2 days. Hence the edits, changes, and further changes to his original "article".
And you are to stupid to comprehend this. Amazing...
HondoRRFS...
Trump will gain 5 more points
It's a funny story actually...Trump probably exaggerated, but others have used old Washington Post articles and others to contradict the Washington Post's "fact-checker".
http://www.powerlineblog.com/archiv...t-checker-doesnt-read-the-washington-post.php
http://www.steynonline.com/7313/jersey-sure
So, again, good to see you being a lapdog for the left.
You are totally grasping at straws. Given that your article says the exact same thing as my article.
And I'm the " lapdog ". That's funny shit.