Dazzler is part of the radicals that have been working towards an impeachment of Thomas for years because they don't like Black conservatives period. BS narrative being pushed by a bunch of fucking racist DIMS. Fuck off Dazzler. Thomas isn't going away.
What a shrill little girl you are, Olga.
Demanding a judge recuse himself from a case involving his wife is just like impeachment.
Remind us when you ever called for a Liberal Justice to do the same. You radical assholes have called for both Kavanaugh and ACB to recuse themselves. Your side isn't going to run Thomas off the court.
Which liberal justice presided over a case directly involving their spouse?
Recusing oneself from a case directly involving one's spouse is now a "radical" position?
When did I ever advocate "running Thomas off the court"?
Don't bother to answer; those were rhetorical.
Ginsberg would not recuse herself from cases being argued by the Law Firm her husband worked for. In fact her daughter wrote an article that was submitted in a petitioners brief and Ginsberg voted for the outcome argued by her daughter. She publicly attacked Trump as a "faker" then ruled against him in a case brought before the court. You're a fucking hypocrite Dazzler. Your words here are worthless that dogshit.
I've never argued Clarence Thomas should recuse himself based upon his political opinions, or his wife's. Whether those opinions be publicly expressed or unexpressed, I don't care. That's not my objection.
He should not, however, be deliberating over a case directly affecting his spouse--whether her own[/i][/b] communications are discoverable. That's so obvious, and so distinguishable from your RBG example, that even you can probably see the difference.
