This will never end

jecornel

New Fish
When will masses decide this enough.

mbehspflojp1.jpeg
 
I'm old enough to remember all the talk and promises about how she would be moderate
 
Reading more than a Right Wing headline is a bridge too far, obviously.

Must

Defend

Everything

She posed a perfectly appropriate hypothetical.

But the Tug’s preferred fag has a headline.

Carry on, ladies.

I know you will.

Surprised you had time to see it given your history with White House correspondence
 
He doesn't even know who the woman, who can't define herself, is.

Clever in your head?

I can define what a man is because I am one. She couldn't define what she is. So why should anything she has to say be taken seriously? Answer, it can't be.

Still can't figure out why female feminists gave up the moral high ground to male trannies. Turned out that they have the same amount of spine and brains as the dazzler.
 
Reading more than a Right Wing headline is a bridge too far, obviously.

Must

Defend

Everything

She posed a perfectly appropriate hypothetical.

But the Tug’s preferred fag has a headline.

Carry on, ladies.

I know you will.

Hate to do it, but I'm forced to agree with the Dazzler. Heard her argument yesterday, that's not what she did. But it did reveal that when someone is selected entirely based on skin color and gender you shouldn't be shocked when the view most issues through a racial lens.
 
Last edited:
Reading more than a Right Wing headline is a bridge too far, obviously.

Must

Defend

Everything

She posed a perfectly appropriate hypothetical.

But the Tug’s preferred fag has a headline.

Carry on, ladies.

I know you will.

Hate to do it, but I'm forced to agree with the Dazzler. Heard her argument yesterday, that's not what she did. But it did reveal that when someone is selected entirely based on skin color and gender you shouldn't be shocked when the view most issues through a racial lens.

Sitting on Santa's lap isn't speech and it generally occurs in the public square. Making a web designer build a website to promote gay marriage is definitely making the web designer make a statement she doesn't want to make.

Try running an anti-puberty blocker ad at The Advocate and see where that gets you.
 
Reading more than a Right Wing headline is a bridge too far, obviously.

Must

Defend

Everything

She posed a perfectly appropriate hypothetical.

But the Tug’s preferred fag has a headline.

Carry on, ladies.

I know you will.

Hate to do it, but I'm forced to agree with the Dazzler. Heard her argument yesterday, that's not what she did. But it did reveal that when someone is selected entirely based on skin color and gender you shouldn't be shocked when the view most issues through a racial lens.

Sitting on Santa's lap isn't speech and it generally occurs in the public square. Making a web designer build a website to promote gay marriage is definitely making the web designer make a statement she doesn't want to make.

Try running an anti-puberty blocker ad at The Advocate and see where that gets you.

Doesn't address that the headline in the GP was dishonest.
 
I been savin' this money for a divorce, if ever I got a husband.[/i][/b]

Judge Jackson kind of looks like Annie. Too bad America just isn't ready to deal with a Justice with braids.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top