You know @puppylove_sugarsteel is butthurt when he posts twice in a row within the same thread.
Didn't you flag him 20 times in another thread? LOL okay J
You know @puppylove_sugarsteel is butthurt when he posts twice in a row within the same thread.
I haven't said that shit for 15 years ...
What was dooging last year? Saying before the season that we'd be bowl eligible?
The reality is that there's a handful of people on this bored that will find something to bitch about no matter what happens unless we go undefeated and win a national championship.
We? are mediocre until we aren't.
We? are mediocre until we aren't.
Drew Sample is going to take a big jump next year, same with Bierria
Got a feeling about #7
He really took a jump this year, now he's feeling it! Best backers ive seen here in a very long time.
Need to upgrade the receivers
You can win without Steve Largents and Andre Risons, but they help especially with an average at best OC.
John Ross w I ll upgrade the receivers Bill. Thats why I didnt waste space on the WR unit. Expect Pettis to have a big year too. Our WR's will be just fine, trust Pump on that. That unit is the absolute last of our worries.
He will help but he doesn't make it an elite group.
Puppy comments:
This team is a year away however next year might be the greatest opportunity
'17 sets up for the playoff run but early defections may hurt the defense
2 huge games at Oregon and my pre-season north pick WSU could be deadly. In '17 the schedule pits the big games at home, with jr's and seniors all over the roster (if everyone stays, unlikely). Can our freshmen and sophomores play like upper classmen a year early?
Puppy playing both sides so that his meds can talk to anybody that disagrees with him ...
2017 will be special ... BUT ... defensive defections may fuck that over so 2016 may be the more likely year to win ...
No confidence on winning games on the road in 2016 with young guys stepping up compromising the ability for '16 to be special ... BUT ... 2017 will be special IF everybody stays because all of the tough games are at home and littered with juniors and seniors ...
Puppy likes to talk about those that KJV ran ... but also forgets that he takes 81% of his double sided talking points straight from the KJV playbook ...
I suggest Puppy continues trying to beat your chest against lightweights of knowledge like Tommy instead of a true heavyweight of knowledge like me
Puppy comments:
This team is a year away however next year might be the greatest opportunity
'17 sets up for the playoff run but early defections may hurt the defense
2 huge games at Oregon and my pre-season north pick WSU could be deadly. In '17 the schedule pits the big games at home, with jr's and seniors all over the roster (if everyone stays, unlikely). Can our freshmen and sophomores play like upper classmen a year early?
Puppy playing both sides so that his meds can talk to anybody that disagrees with him ...
2017 will be special ... BUT ... defensive defections may fuck that over so 2016 may be the more likely year to win ...
No confidence on winning games on the road in 2016 with young guys stepping up compromising the ability for '16 to be special ... BUT ... 2017 will be special IF everybody stays because all of the tough games are at home and littered with juniors and seniors ...
Puppy likes to talk about those that KJV ran ... but also forgets that he takes 81% of his double sided talking points straight from the KJV playbook ...
I suggest Puppy continues trying to beat your chest against lightweights of knowledge like Tommy instead of a true heavyweight of knowledge like me
Considering you're closer to Kim and Puppy on the doog scale than I am, not sure why you're popping off.
You just proved my point ...
It's not about being a doog or not ... those that attack doogs would rather be right than see UW be successful.
If you can't see that there's a lot going on right in the program right now then you've got the blinders on. Even strong nega-believers like Dead Dog on the Road @RoadDawg55 can admit that things are well positioned they just are wondering where the fuck up will come.
Tommy, Nacho, tequilla, would you rather talk about Pete's performance vs Boise St last year ?
Tommy, Nacho, tequilla, would you rather talk about Pete's performance vs Boise St last year ?
So we can talk about what we know happened vs. what you think will happen? By the way, if we want to read about we think will happen, we could just look at Dawgman to see what Kim is saying.
Tommy, Nacho, tequilla, would you rather talk about Pete's performance vs Boise St last year ?
So we can talk about what we know happened vs. what you think will happen? By the way, if we want to read about we think will happen, we could just look at Dawgman to see what Kim is saying.
Nacho, thats generally what a football forum is for, not to rehash an old insignificant game with a true freshman QB making his 1st start, then trying to draw conclusions about the head coach. See thats what you and teqilla do. Not much fun 6 months later and on the cusp of spring football
Need to upgrade the receivers
You can win without Steve Largents and Andre Risons, but they help especially with an average at best OC.
John Ross w I ll upgrade the receivers Bill. Thats why I didnt waste space on the WR unit. Expect Pettis to have a big year too. Our WR's will be just fine, trust Pump on that. That unit is the absolute last of our worries.
He will help but he doesn't make it an elite group.
Doesnt have to be elite Bill. They'll be as good as any team in the conference sans USC
Ross makes Browning great bill, thats what matters. Oh, he makes lenius and Pettis better too. Should I go on?