This isn't rocket surgery (LULZ)...

Swaye

Swaye

Moderator
Staff member
Swaye's Wigwam
Founder's Club
My sources are telling me that some fuckasses think it is bullshit that when Sark losses a single game, we all put on the "we told you so" act, while if Peterman losses a game, we will give him the benefit of the doubt. These booftwats claim that is unfair. We have different standards for these two guys.

Guess what monkey nuts? 95-12 vs. 36-30. An .888 winning percentage buys you instant credibility. A barely over .500 record buys you a cup of coffee, if you have a buck to go with that useless shitstain of a record. I'm embarrassed I actually had to explain what the difference is between a two time BCS bowl winning coach, and a middling frat boy from SoCal.

If none of this makes sense to you, go back to Doogman, drink a gallon of kerosene, and deep throat a road flare.
 
Last edited:
My sources are telling me that some fuckasses think it is bullshit that when Sark losses a single game, we all put on the "we told you so" act, while if Peterman losses a game, we will give him the benefit of the doubt. These booftwats claim that is unfair. We have different standards for these two guys.

Guess what monkey nuts? 95-12 vs. 36-30. An .888 winning percentage buys you instant credibility. A barely over .500 record buys you a cup of coffee, if you have a buck to go with that useless shitstain of a record. I'm embarrassed I actually had to explain what the difference is between a two time BCS bowl winning coach, and a middling frat boy from SoCal.

If none of this makes sense to you, go back to Doogman, drink a gallon of kerosene, and deep throat a road flare.
Click to expand...

Should they also light the road flare? Or just as is? Thanks in advance.
 
My sources are telling me that some fuckasses think it is bullshit that when Sark losses a single game, we all put on the "we told you so" act, while if Peterman losses a game, we will give him the benefit of the doubt. These booftwats claim that is unfair. We have different standards for these two guys.

Guess what monkey nuts? 95-12 vs. 36-30. An .888 winning percentage buys you instant credibility. A barely over .500 record buys you a cup of coffee, if you have a buck to go with that useless shitstain of a record. I'm embarrassed I actually had to explain what the difference is between a two time BCS bowl winning coach, and a middling frat boy from SoCal.

If none of this makes sense to you, go back to Doogman, drink a gallon of kerosene, and deep throat a road flare.
Click to expand...

Should they also light the road flare? Or just as is? Thanks in advance.
Click to expand...

If you are deep throating it right, the friction will ignite the kerosene.
 
My sources are telling me that some fuckasses think it is bullshit that when Sark losses a single game, we all put on the "we told you so" act, while if Peterman losses a game, we will give him the benefit of the doubt. These booftwats claim that is unfair. We have different standards for these two guys.

Guess what monkey nuts? 95-12 vs. 36-30. An .888 winning percentage buys you instant credibility. A barely over .500 record buys you a cup of coffee, if you have a buck to go with that useless shitstain of a record. I'm embarrassed I actually had to explain what the difference is between a two time BCS bowl winning coach, and a middling frat boy from SoCal.

If none of this makes sense to you, go back to Doogman, drink a gallon of kerosene, and deep throat a road flare.
Click to expand...

Should they also light the road flare? Or just as is? Thanks in advance.
Click to expand...

If you are deep throating it right, the friction will ignite the kerosene.
Click to expand...

H_D stop using your teeth.
 
Only on HH will everyone key into the subtle nuances of how the road flare should be fellated to best induce combustion and doog death.
 
My sources are telling me that some fuckasses think it is bullshit that when Sark losses a single game, we all put on the "we told you so" act, while if Peterman losses a game, we will give him the benefit of the doubt. These booftwats claim that is unfair. We have different standards for these two guys.

Guess what monkey nuts? 95-12 vs. 36-30. An .888 winning percentage buys you instant credibility. A barely over .500 record gets you a job coaching one of the premier college football programs, if you have @PatHadenFS‌ as the AD. buys you a cup of coffee, if you have a buck to go with that useless shitstain of a record. I'm embarrassed I actually had to explain what the difference is between a two time BCS bowl winning coach, and a middling frat boy from SoCal.

If none of this makes sense to you, go back to Doogman, drink a gallon of kerosene, and deep throat a road flare.
Click to expand...

 
this_thread_delivers.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top