This is what happens

Rather than be rewarded, Adams's advocacy should be called out for what it is: an improper offer of immigration enforcement assistance in exchange for a dismissal of his case. Although Mr. Bove disclaimed any intention to exchange leniency in this case for Adams's assistance in enforcing federal law, that is the nature of the bargain laid bare in Mr. Bove's memo. That is especially so given Mr. Bove's comparison to the Bout prisoner exchange, which was quite expressly a quid pro quo, but one carried out by the White House, and not the prosecutors in charge of Bout's case.

The comparison to the Bout exchange is particularly alarming. That prisoner swap was an exchange of official acts between separate sovereigns (the United States and Russia), neither of which had any claim that the other should obey its laws. By contrast, Adams is an American citizen, and a local elected official, who is seeking a personal benefit—immunity from federal laws to which he is undoubtedly subject—in exchange for an act-enforcement of federal law he has no right to refuse.
 
Last edited:
H’s racism always is just beneath the surface.
Adams is a Bad Negro for bringing up how the White Dem masters were flooding his city with illegal aliens, and how it was negatively impacting his citizens.
We all know you’re a big fan of lawfare, H.
Just embrace it.

Adams is a Bad Negro for bringing up how the White Dem masters were flooding his city with illegal aliens, and how it was negatively impacting his citizens.
Have to punish those who try to leave the plantation the hardest.
 
Last edited:
Dems are about three years from being the party of mentally ill sex freaks, screaming White Karens, black women who depend on assistance, and beta males like @HHusky.
 
Rather than be rewarded, Adams's advocacy should be called out for what it is: an improper offer of immigration enforcement assistance in exchange for a dismissal of his case. 
Chrissey is stupid.
 
Umm…….we have had 8 years of rat prosecutors, rat DOJ, rat FBI leaders using their power illegally to get Trump. None of you can be trusted, your legal team has lost all respect.
As soon as Adams started complaining about sanctuary city bullshit and the strain it was putting on the city and state, your team went after him.
The fact that this letter was distributed publicly in an effort to again hurt Trump is the tell.
 
Bendintheriver said:
Umm…….we have had 8 years of rat prosecutors, rat DOJ, rat FBI leaders using their power illegally to get Trump. None of you can be trusted, your legal team has lost all respect.
As soon as Adams started complaining about sanctuary city bullshit and the strain it was putting on the city and state, your team went after him.
The fact that this letter was distributed publicly in an effort to again hurt Trump is the tell.
Click to expand...
This is a Trump team prosecutor. Clerked for (and adored) Scalia.
Daddy takes a back seat to absolutely no one's corruption.
 
HHusky said:
Bendintheriver said:
Umm…….we have had 8 years of rat prosecutors, rat DOJ, rat FBI leaders using their power illegally to get Trump. None of you can be trusted, your legal team has lost all respect.
As soon as Adams started complaining about sanctuary city bullshit and the strain it was putting on the city and state, your team went after him.
The fact that this letter was distributed publicly in an effort to again hurt Trump is the tell.
Click to expand...
This is a Trump team prosecutor. Clerked for (and adored) Scalia.
Daddy takes a back seat to absolutely no one's corruption.
Click to expand...
Your delusions take a back seat to no one.

.
 
It is a breathtaking and dangerous precedent to reward Adams's opportunistic and shifting commitments on immigration and other policy matters with dismissal of a criminal indictment. Nor will a court likely find that such an improper exchange is consistent with the public interest.
Again, [Adams seeks] a personal benefit—immunity from federal laws to which he is undoubtedly subject—in exchange for an act-enforcement of federal law he has no right to refuse.

Why hate on Columbia or Venezuela? Daddy wants to emulate such places.
 
HHusky said:
It is a breathtaking and dangerous precedent to reward Adams's opportunistic and shifting commitments on immigration and other policy matters with dismissal of a criminal indictment. Nor will a court likely find that such an improper exchange is consistent with the public interest.
Again, [Adams seeks] a personal benefit—immunity from federal laws to which he is undoubtedly subject—in exchange for an act-enforcement of federal law he has no right to refuse.

Why hate on Columbia or Venezuela? Daddy wants to emulate such places.
Click to expand...
One thing is for sure, you want politically motivated prosecutions to continue. Sad for you. Maybe you can find help in these trying tims.

.
 
pawz said:
HHusky said:
It is a breathtaking and dangerous precedent to reward Adams's opportunistic and shifting commitments on immigration and other policy matters with dismissal of a criminal indictment. Nor will a court likely find that such an improper exchange is consistent with the public interest.
Again, [Adams seeks] a personal benefit—immunity from federal laws to which he is undoubtedly subject—in exchange for an act-enforcement of federal law he has no right to refuse.

Why hate on Columbia or Venezuela? Daddy wants to emulate such places.
Click to expand...
One thing is for sure, you want politically motivated prosecutions to continue. Sad for you. Maybe you can find help in these trying tims.

.
Click to expand...
Daddy's motivation in committing most of his 96 felonies was political. That didn't make the prosecution of those crimes politically motivated.
 
H rage posting about a black man being freed and following the law on immigration
 
HHusky said:
pawz said:
HHusky said:
It is a breathtaking and dangerous precedent to reward Adams's opportunistic and shifting commitments on immigration and other policy matters with dismissal of a criminal indictment. Nor will a court likely find that such an improper exchange is consistent with the public interest.
Again, [Adams seeks] a personal benefit—immunity from federal laws to which he is undoubtedly subject—in exchange for an act-enforcement of federal law he has no right to refuse.

Why hate on Columbia or Venezuela? Daddy wants to emulate such places.
Click to expand...
One thing is for sure, you want politically motivated prosecutions to continue. Sad for you. Maybe you can find help in these trying tims.

.
Click to expand...
Daddy's motivation in committing most of his 96 felonies was political. That didn't make the prosecution of those crimes politically motivated.
Click to expand...
96 felonies? Do you have a few favorites you can share with us?

.
 
pawz said:
HHusky said:
pawz said:
HHusky said:
It is a breathtaking and dangerous precedent to reward Adams's opportunistic and shifting commitments on immigration and other policy matters with dismissal of a criminal indictment. Nor will a court likely find that such an improper exchange is consistent with the public interest.
Again, [Adams seeks] a personal benefit—immunity from federal laws to which he is undoubtedly subject—in exchange for an act-enforcement of federal law he has no right to refuse.

Why hate on Columbia or Venezuela? Daddy wants to emulate such places.
Click to expand...
One thing is for sure, you want politically motivated prosecutions to continue. Sad for you. Maybe you can find help in these trying tims.

.
Click to expand...
Daddy's motivation in committing most of his 96 felonies was political. That didn't make the prosecution of those crimes politically motivated.
Click to expand...
96 felonies? Do you have a few favorites you can share with us?

.
Click to expand...
I big enough to admit when I'm wrong.
It was only 91, I'm told.
I think the indictments he never got tried for because you cocksuckers elected him President were even more interesting than the 34 he was convicted of. Personal preference.
 
HHusky said:
Rather than be rewarded, Adams's advocacy should be called out for what it is: an improper offer of immigration enforcement assistance in exchange for a dismissal of his case. 
Chrissey is stupid.
Click to expand...
Yes H, I understand that following federal laws for you Dems depends on if you agree with it or not.
It’s the law, “attorney.”
 
You’ve ghosted since you thought the ‘D’ in DEI was for “Disability,” but that’s because you’re just stupid when posting in your own.
 
EverettChris said:
HHusky said:
Rather than be rewarded, Adams's advocacy should be called out for what it is: an improper offer of immigration enforcement assistance in exchange for a dismissal of his case. 
Chrissey is stupid.
Click to expand...
Yes H, I understand that following federal laws for you Dems depends on if you agree with it or not.
It’s the law, “attorney.”
Click to expand...
I’ve rarely seen anyone quite so proud of her own inability to follow an argument. You’re very special.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top