This is a pretty balanced look at climate change

[RaceBannon]

My solution

 

[[Deleted User]]

Skeptics were right about Husky football dumbass. We didn't swallow like you. Lindzen was respected enough to be on the original report.

You wouldn't even make the scout team

Still gargling Lindzen's balls. The point is he was good in the beginning but turned bitter and political and his scientific work suffered. Sad really.

Two different kinds of skeptics.

He was good when he agreed with the crowd. When he thought for himself he had to be discredited. Just like us half brains. Not you. You're out Fredo

He doesn't think for himself and his science is shitty.

Hth

 

[RaceBannon]

Skeptics were right about Husky football dumbass. We didn't swallow like you. Lindzen was respected enough to be on the original report.

You wouldn't even make the scout team

Still gargling Lindzen's balls. The point is he was good in the beginning but turned bitter and political and his scientific work suffered. Sad really.

Two different kinds of skeptics.

He was good when he agreed with the crowd. When he thought for himself he had to be discredited. Just like us half brains. Not you. You're out Fredo

He doesn't think for himself and his science is shitty.

Hth

Riiiight

You are kind of an expert on not thinking for yourself

Everybody says so

Oh wait, that's who we half brains mocked.

You're out Fredo

 

[[Deleted User]]

http://www.skepticalscience.com/skeptic_Richard_Lindzen.htm

He argues against literally all the hard data.

It's mind boggling that you take his word for anything.

 

[RaceBannon]

Everyone knows the earth is flat. Excommunicate him!

REAL science is all about skepticism just like REAL half brains

You're out Fredo

 

[[Deleted User]]

Everyone knows the earth is flat. Excommunicate him!

REAL science is all about skepticism just like REAL half brains

You're out Fredo

And all the REAL scientists have listened to skeptics claims, taken them into account when assessing the data, and deemed them unfounded.

Stick to real estate and sports.

 

[RaceBannon]

Everyone knows the earth is flat. Excommunicate him!

REAL science is all about skepticism just like REAL half brains

You're out Fredo

And all the REAL scientists have listened to skeptics claims, taken them into account when assessing the data, and deemed them unfounded.

Stick to real estate and sports.

Ah yes the settled science fraud. The last refuge of a doog

Everybody says so

 

[CuntWaffle]

 

[[Deleted User]]

Didn't know you were secretly death2ducks.

 

[MikeDamone]

CollegeDoog said it isn't about warming anyway. He said "oil is great", and shifted the debate to what will people in the next three or four generations use when the oil supply fails to meet demand. Isn't that correct? In that debate, it isn't about science, it's about economics. A topic he is woefully lacking in.

 

[CuntWaffle]

CollegeDoog said it isn't about warming anyway. He said "oil is great", and shifted the debate to what will people in the next three or four generations use when the oil supply fails to meet demand. Isn't that correct? In that debate, it isn't about science, it's about economics. A topic he is woefully lacking in.

Why do you only point out things when CollegeDoog is wrong?

 

[[Deleted User]]

CollegeDoog said it isn't about warming anyway. He said "oil is great", and shifted the debate to what will people in the next three or four generations use when the oil supply fails to meet demand. Isn't that correct? In that debate, it isn't about science, it's about economics. A topic he is woefully lacking in.

The life oil gave us is great. What was once a boon is now a risk.

If you really care about the middle class and the poor you'd be worried about the 2% crop decrease expected in the next 20 years, against a 10-14% increase in global population.

You'd worry about the droughts and the excess water vapor, a result of increased atmospheric CO2, that creates wild fires and more extreme weather. I worry about the people of New Orleans and coastal New Jersey. The people in Tornado Alley.

The people effected by the flooding in Colorado and Iowa. The flooding expected to come to coastal cities as sea ice melts and oceans rise.

There's a sound bite.

 

[MikeDamone]

CollegeDoog said it isn't about warming anyway. He said "oil is great", and shifted the debate to what will people in the next three or four generations use when the oil supply fails to meet demand. Isn't that correct? In that debate, it isn't about science, it's about economics. A topic he is woefully lacking in.

The life oil gave us is great. What was once a boon is now a risk.

If you really care about the middle class and the poor you'd be worried about the 2% crop decrease in the next 20 years, against a 10-14% increase in global population.

You'd worry about the droughts and the excess water vapor, a result of increased atmospheric CO2, that creates wild fires and more extreme weather. I worry about the people of New Orleans and coastal New Jersey. The people in Tornado Alley.

The people effected by the flooding in Colorado and Iowa. The flooding expected to come to coastal cities as sea ice melts and oceans rise.

There's a sound bite.

 

[CuntWaffle]

Funny how CollegeDoog is so worried about these people yet has no issues with Todd Doxey jokes. Such a gentleman.

 

[dnc]

CollegeDoog said it isn't about warming anyway. He said "oil is great", and shifted the debate to what will people in the next three or four generations use when the oil supply fails to meet demand. Isn't that correct? In that debate, it isn't about science, it's about economics. A topic he is woefully lacking in.

The life oil gave us is great. What was once a boon is now a risk.

If you really care about the middle class and the poor you'd be worried about the 2% crop decrease expected in the next 20 years, against a 10-14% increase in global population.

You'd worry about the droughts and the excess water vapor, a result of increased atmospheric CO2, that creates wild fires and more extreme weather. I worry about the people of New Orleans and coastal New Jersey. The people in Tornado Alley.

The people effected by the flooding in Colorado and Iowa. The flooding expected to come to coastal cities as sea ice melts and oceans rise.

There's a sound bite.

+1

I am also against bullying, war and parking lot rapes

 

[uw2010]

I can't tell if this thread is full of win or full of fail.

Abundance?

 

[[Deleted User]]

CollegeDoog said it isn't about warming anyway. He said "oil is great", and shifted the debate to what will people in the next three or four generations use when the oil supply fails to meet demand. Isn't that correct? In that debate, it isn't about science, it's about economics. A topic he is woefully lacking in.

The life oil gave us is great. What was once a boon is now a risk.

If you really care about the middle class and the poor you'd be worried about the 2% crop decrease expected in the next 20 years, against a 10-14% increase in global population.

You'd worry about the droughts and the excess water vapor, a result of increased atmospheric CO2, that creates wild fires and more extreme weather. I worry about the people of New Orleans and coastal New Jersey. The people in Tornado Alley.

The people effected by the flooding in Colorado and Iowa. The flooding expected to come to coastal cities as sea ice melts and oceans rise.

There's a sound bite.

+1

I am also against bullying, war and parking lot rapes

I'm for internet bullying.

So there's that.

 

[MikeDamone]

CollegeDoog said it isn't about warming anyway. He said "oil is great", and shifted the debate to what will people in the next three or four generations use when the oil supply fails to meet demand. Isn't that correct? In that debate, it isn't about science, it's about economics. A topic he is woefully lacking in.

The life oil gave us is great. What was once a boon is now a risk.

If you really care about the middle class and the poor you'd be worried about the 2% crop decrease expected in the next 20 years, against a 10-14% increase in global population.

You'd worry about the droughts and the excess water vapor, a result of increased atmospheric CO2, that creates wild fires and more extreme weather. I worry about the people of New Orleans and coastal New Jersey. The people in Tornado Alley.

The people effected by the flooding in Colorado and Iowa. The flooding expected to come to coastal cities as sea ice melts and oceans rise.

There's a sound bite.

+1

I am also against bullying, war and parking lot rapes

I support the troops

 

[CuntWaffle]

CollegeDoog said it isn't about warming anyway. He said "oil is great", and shifted the debate to what will people in the next three or four generations use when the oil supply fails to meet demand. Isn't that correct? In that debate, it isn't about science, it's about economics. A topic he is woefully lacking in.

The life oil gave us is great. What was once a boon is now a risk.

If you really care about the middle class and the poor you'd be worried about the 2% crop decrease expected in the next 20 years, against a 10-14% increase in global population.

You'd worry about the droughts and the excess water vapor, a result of increased atmospheric CO2, that creates wild fires and more extreme weather. I worry about the people of New Orleans and coastal New Jersey. The people in Tornado Alley.

The people effected by the flooding in Colorado and Iowa. The flooding expected to come to coastal cities as sea ice melts and oceans rise.

There's a sound bite.

+1

I am also against bullying, war and parking lot rapes

I support the troops

War?

 

[RoadDawg55]

Skeptics were right about Husky football dumbass. We didn't swallow like you. Lindzen was respected enough to be on the original report.

You wouldn't even make the scout team

Still gargling Lindzen's balls. The point is he was good in the beginning but turned bitter and political and his scientific work suffered. Sad really.

Two different kinds of skeptics.

Are you talking about Lindzen or Derek Johnson?