Self-noted scholar fails to see extreme distortion in legal favoritism over last decade
"This is a big deal"
- Thread starter DerekJohnson
- Start date
DucksFC
Active poster
“it doesn’t support my views so therefore it must be favoritism and crooked”
Or you could actually look at who these judges are and the conflict of interests
You could look up how the deportations are constitutional
Or just be like H and act retarded
You could look up how the deportations are constitutional
Or just be like H and act retarded
Blu82
New Fish
It has to be the latter.
You have to be retarded to not see the former.
For an alleged straight guy, SoccerDunce sure brings up circlejerks a lot.
COurts are incorrect on most of this Trump stuff. This ismn't a constitutional republic if courts and usurp long standing presidential powers. Trumps right to flip them off and move on. Biden ignored the supreme court and the BB/CC crew cheered.
Last edited:
DucksFC
Active poster
"or you can just agree with me that they're crooked because I don't like what they're doing, and how dare anyone not let Trump do whatever the fuck he wants"
The President has executive powers to execute the law of the land. What the dementia patient did was to ignore our federal immigration statutes. Soccer duck had no problem with open borders and illegal immigration. Now, he thinks an unelected federal district judge can issue a federal wide injunction against the President to stop him from deporting invading illegal criminal aliens. Next thing we will have a federal district judge enjoin the President from signing legislation.
SCOTUS needs to be expanded because of Roe, and Biden can ignore a ruling on student loan debt, but one Obama judge in some district courtroom can take over duties for the CIC on a military mission flying out declared terrorists.
No wonder you idiots are losing more ground each day.
No wonder you idiots are losing more ground each day.
DucksFC
Active poster
love that you assume what I do and don't have a problem with. you dorks never fail to post the same old shit in every reply.
judges have always been able to do this. this isn't new - it is checks and balances 101. it's not the fault of the rest of us you didn't know that. imagine being this much of a snowflake because you can't comprehend how our government works.
Last edited:
Trump should and most likely will ignore on things. He has the power but some lefty loon installed in a district court somewhere by God knows who at this point has more power than the prez. Bullshit. Odd how these judges show up on the grift of USAID money etc. Or their family magically does.
Where's was your voice when dementia Joe ignored the supreme court let alone some lower court. Not a peep.
Where's was your voice when dementia Joe ignored the supreme court let alone some lower court. Not a peep.
So H it is
DucksFC
Active poster
Sleddy failed 9th grade government when he was 19. Teachers tried to get him to read, to no avail.
Sleddy failed 9th grade government when he was 19. Teachers tried to get him to read, to no avail.
What part of sending illegal immigrant gang members back to where they came from is unconstitutional?
Please cite the Article and Section please.
It's section my cunt hurts
But why is Roberts a piece of shit?
The prez has a lot more power than you think and far more than your little diagram shows.
Sleddy failed 9th grade government when he was 19. Teachers tried to get him to read, to no avail.
Joe ignored the loan forgiveness ruling.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/joe-biden-student-debt-forgiveness-supreme-court-0c5204fe
Speak up comrade!
DucksFC
Active poster
Sure. It’s both the 5th and 14th Amendments. Which pretty every single article on this so far as also said, but apparently you didn’t read them. Due process is one of the most basic components in the constitution.
Sleddy failed 9th grade government when he was 19. Teachers tried to get him to read, to no avail.
What part of sending illegal immigrant gang members back to where they came from is unconstitutional?
Please cite the Article and Section please.
Trump is using the law from 1798 to justify the deportations and ignore due process by claiming we are being invaded by TDA and are effectively in a war against them. The law specifies it pertains to countries themselves at war with or invading the US. In which, in all 3 other circumstances, the US used it under an official declaration of war: against England, Germany and Japan. We’re not at war with Venezuela. We’re not at war with anyone. Unless Trump wants to go ahead and declare war on them, he’s going to have a hard time justifying the use of this act to ignore due process. Because I guarantee that is the first question SCOTUS will ask.
Nobody is saying TDA members should be allowed to stay in the country. I don’t want them here. But that’s where you girls always trip and face plant because you like to use your jump to conclusions mat and say because other people support the rule of law, that means we must be a bunch of commies who want violent gang members in this country. We don’t. But there’s a process and we have due process laws for a reason: to protect from situations where people who are not in fact part of these groups and are not committing crimes from also becoming victim to this. Trump wants to ignore them and just round people up as he feels like it. That’s a dangerous and slippery slope, which Trump always likes to push the boundaries of, and where the courts are checking him on. Like it or not, he has to have a constitutional reason to do what he’s doing.
And the funny part is, I’m pretty sure a lot of you, except for Sledog of course, already know all of this. You just don’t care, as usual.
Last edited: