This election makes 2020 look even worse.

I never gave my opinion either way.
7 pages in I assume you have some kind of point?

image.jpeg
 
The dazzler's official mythical MBA position is that corporations can't be trusted and significant internal controls need to be stringently enforced by the SEC to avoid fraud because of all the significant amount of fraud imposed over the years on consumers and shareholders (can you say Enron and Sarbanes-Oxley?). On the other hand, voter fraud has never existed as a material influence on American and State elections and therefore internal controls on the voter registration process (confirming citizenship and only being registered once in a state and only in one state and be alive). No internal controls like voter ID and signature verification aren't needed. No internal controls are needed for chain of custody of votes. No internal controls are needed on voting machines to confirm that the machine properly reported the vote (no paper ballots needed). No internal controls needed on ballot counts versus actual votes. No need to follow the Constitution that the presidential election occurs on Tuesday following the first Monday in November. In short, people don't cheat on elections and if they do trying to stop them is racist and therefore enforcing these rules is the moral high ground.
 
image.png

Looks strangely familiar. Just can't quite place it…
Kari Lake was never ahead in the count.
At times she was close. She was probably a hot piece of ass 15 years ago. It's time she tried something new though.
I like conservatives that fight and actually expose voting corruption rather than ignore it like the left and MSM want them to do.
She tried. Maybe Fontes and the governor who sounds like a 14 year old girl rigged it. Maybe she's not a great politician. The media sucks and it's been corrupted possibly beyond repair so she left it and tried to do something about it twice. It's tim for new blood.
 
Counting record voter turnout and registrations among the GOP to the count total lol.
You're still about 7 million short on the side accused. That's about 10% of total.
And that's assuming a mutually exclusive zero sum to make the argument.
I know, I know, math isn't a strong suit.
 
Counting record voter turnout and registrations among the GOP to the count total lol.
You're still about 7 million short on the side accused. That's about 10% of total.
And that's assuming a mutually exclusive zero sum to make the argument.
I know, I know, math isn't a strong suit.
Bot helpfully explains that if you lose votes, you are more likely to have fewer votes.
Thanks Einstein!
 
Last edited:
Counting record voter turnout and registrations among the GOP to the count total lol.
You're still about 7 million short on the side accused. That's about 10% of total.
And that's assuming a mutually exclusive zero sum to make the argument.
I know, I know, math isn't a strong suit.
Bot helpfully explains that if you lose votes, you are more likely to lose than if you gain votes.
Thanks Einstein!
Mildred can't follow a simple line of thought today. Must have forgotten her meds.
Itshard.gif
 
Counting record voter turnout and registrations among the GOP to the count total lol.
You're still about 7 million short on the side accused. That's about 10% of total.
And that's assuming a mutually exclusive zero sum to make the argument.
I know, I know, math isn't a strong suit.
Bot helpfully explains that if you lose votes, you are more likely to lose than if you gain votes.
Thanks Einstein!
Mildred can't follow a simple line of thought today. Must have forgotten her meds.
Itshard.gif
I don't think you even understood why blob and Gasbag were excitedly poasting on this topic to begin with.
You misspelled "simpleton line of thought."
 
Counting record voter turnout and registrations among the GOP to the count total lol.
You're still about 7 million short on the side accused. That's about 10% of total.
And that's assuming a mutually exclusive zero sum to make the argument.
I know, I know, math isn't a strong suit.
Bot helpfully explains that if you lose votes, you are more likely to lose than if you gain votes.
Thanks Einstein!
Mildred can't follow a simple line of thought today. Must have forgotten her meds.
Itshard.gif
I don't think you even understood why blob and Gasbag were excitedly poasting on this topic to begin with.
You misspelled "simpleton line of thought."
Sure.gif
You're boring today for being such a spaz.
 
People need to wait until the balance of votes are counted to make conclusions vs 2020
If you take current vote totals by the estimated vote count and then extrapolate you’ll get a number that’s relatively consistent with 2020 in terms of total votes

IF the total vote count for 2020 and 2024 are reasonably aligned then most of the conversations around stuffing the ballot box should probably be put to rest
Here's a paradox: Tequilla was exactly right, of course, and you upvoted this post, @UW_Doog_Bot.
#NotLaughingWithYouBot
 
Last edited:
Back
Top