There's really no downside re: Peters Dismissal

[TierbsHsotBoobs]

The 12th exhibition season in a row is even more special than I imagined it would be.

 

[TierbsHsotBoobs]

UCLA and arguably Arizona are good teams broski

No.

Just no.

 

[TTJ]

For all intensive purposes, TSIO.

Peters was no doubt leaving for the league after this year, as he should, so he had no future in the program. Sidney Jones, Nate Dogg Jr, Gardenhire, etc. are all freshman that will benefit a ton from the extra playing time over the last few games. But that's not even the biggest part of this.

Successful people can see past a short term pain or loss for a long term gain.

Sark would be doing anything and everything he could to get to a SPECIAL 9 WIN SEASON, what a cool year for the Huskies man. Petersen realizes the individual outcomes of these last 4 games don't really mean shit in the long run, but rather a great opportunity for growth as a program. This is Petersen saying I don't give a fuck if you're the best corner in the country in a shitty secondary, if you're not buying into the program and the team, we don't need you. If you think you're bigger than the team, we don't need you. He gave Peters a chance to clean his shit up after the Eastern debacle, he didn't, and now he's door. ass. out.

The move gives credibility to Petersen, his staff, and the program. No empty threats here. Respect the program, process, coach, and most importantly your teammates or else you can LEAVE.

Uh, no.

These next two games matter. A lot. Manage a split (or better), and Pete gets a respectable bowl bid and a lot of momentum rolling into recruiting season. Drop them both, and you spend the entire offseason answering questions about whether the program is still just treading water.

Dismissing Peters was the right call for the long-term good of the program. But pretending the short-term hit to your defense doesn't matter is wishful thinking.

 

[Gladstone]

UCLA and arguably Arizona are good teams broski

No.

Just no.

When you're done rooting Mike Slive's cock, please explain how a 7-2 team with losses to #3 and #17, and with a blowout road 62-27 victory @ #9 doesn't qualify as 'good'

If your argument centers on narrow victories over dreckfest teams, don't bother as you've already lost.

 

[dnc]

For all intensive purposes, TSIO.

Peters was no doubt leaving for the league after this year, as he should, so he had no future in the program. Sidney Jones, Nate Dogg Jr, Gardenhire, etc. are all freshman that will benefit a ton from the extra playing time over the last few games. But that's not even the biggest part of this.

Successful people can see past a short term pain or loss for a long term gain.

Sark would be doing anything and everything he could to get to a SPECIAL 9 WIN SEASON, what a cool year for the Huskies man. Petersen realizes the individual outcomes of these last 4 games don't really mean shit in the long run, but rather a great opportunity for growth as a program. This is Petersen saying I don't give a fuck if you're the best corner in the country in a shitty secondary, if you're not buying into the program and the team, we don't need you. If you think you're bigger than the team, we don't need you. He gave Peters a chance to clean his shit up after the Eastern debacle, he didn't, and now he's door. ass. out.

The move gives credibility to Petersen, his staff, and the program. No empty threats here. Respect the program, process, coach, and most importantly your teammates or else you can LEAVE.

Uh, no.

These next two games matter. A lot. Manage a split (or better), and Pete gets a respectable bowl bid and a lot of momentum rolling into recruiting season. Drop them both, and you spend the entire offseason answering questions about whether the program is still just treading water.

Dismissing Peters was the right call for the long-term good of the program. But pretending the short-term hit to your defense doesn't matter is wishful thinking.

this

 

[TierbsHsotBoobs]

For all intensive purposes, TSIO.

Peters was no doubt leaving for the league after this year, as he should, so he had no future in the program. Sidney Jones, Nate Dogg Jr, Gardenhire, etc. are all freshman that will benefit a ton from the extra playing time over the last few games. But that's not even the biggest part of this.

Successful people can see past a short term pain or loss for a long term gain.

Sark would be doing anything and everything he could to get to a SPECIAL 9 WIN SEASON, what a cool year for the Huskies man. Petersen realizes the individual outcomes of these last 4 games don't really mean shit in the long run, but rather a great opportunity for growth as a program. This is Petersen saying I don't give a fuck if you're the best corner in the country in a shitty secondary, if you're not buying into the program and the team, we don't need you. If you think you're bigger than the team, we don't need you. He gave Peters a chance to clean his shit up after the Eastern debacle, he didn't, and now he's door. ass. out.

The move gives credibility to Petersen, his staff, and the program. No empty threats here. Respect the program, process, coach, and most importantly your teammates or else you can LEAVE.

Uh, no.

These next two games matter. A lot. Manage a split (or better), and Pete gets a respectable bowl bid and a lot of momentum rolling into recruiting season. Drop them both, and you spend the entire offseason answering questions about whether the program is still just treading water.

Dismissing Peters was the right call for the long-term good of the program. But pretending the short-term hit to your defense doesn't matter is wishful thinking.

If the CFP committee didn't invite you to the bowl, it's not a respectable bowl.

 

[FreeChavez]

This situation reminds me a lot of titus young. A kid with incredible talent and obvious ability to play at the next level but regularly made stupid decisions. Titus spent an entire year on the sidelines thanks to his inability to understand basic concepts(and probable mental disorder). Peters has some of those same issues where he just doesn't understand or comprehend basic thought. You see it on the field all the time.

It's a huge loss for this defense on the field, but not if he's such a problem in practice it's a massive distraction.

 

[TierbsHsotBoobs]

UCLA and arguably Arizona are good teams broski

No.

Just no.

When you're done rooting Mike Slive's cock, please explain how a 7-2 team with losses to #3 and #17, and with a blowout road 62-27 victory @ #9 doesn't qualify as 'good'

If your argument centers on narrow victories over dreckfest teams, don't bother as you've already lost.

The fact that ASU is #9 in the country just shows that that there are a maximum of eight good teams in the country. I'd call it seven, as I think MSU isn't good either.

 

[pawz]

For all intensive purposes, TSIO.

Peters was no doubt leaving for the league after this year, as he should, so he had no future in the program. Sidney Jones, Nate Dogg Jr, Gardenhire, etc. are all freshman that will benefit a ton from the extra playing time over the last few games. But that's not even the biggest part of this.

Successful people can see past a short term pain or loss for a long term gain.

Sark would be doing anything and everything he could to get to a SPECIAL 9 WIN SEASON, what a cool year for the Huskies man. Petersen realizes the individual outcomes of these last 4 games don't really mean shit in the long run, but rather a great opportunity for growth as a program. This is Petersen saying I don't give a fuck if you're the best corner in the country in a shitty secondary, if you're not buying into the program and the team, we don't need you. If you think you're bigger than the team, we don't need you. He gave Peters a chance to clean his shit up after the Eastern debacle, he didn't, and now he's door. ass. out.

The move gives credibility to Petersen, his staff, and the program. No empty threats here. Respect the program, process, coach, and most importantly your teammates or else you can LEAVE.

Uh, no.

These next two games matter. A lot. Manage a split (or better), and Pete gets a respectable bowl bid and a lot of momentum rolling into recruiting season. Drop them both, and you spend the entire offseason answering questions about whether the program is still just treading water.

Dismissing Peters was the right call for the long-term good of the program. But pretending the short-term hit to your defense doesn't matter is wishful thinking.

If the CFP committee didn't invite you to the bowl, it's not a respectable bowl.

I think it's time to take a walk and get some perspective. TSIFO

 

[TierbsHsotBoobs]

For all intensive purposes, TSIO.

Peters was no doubt leaving for the league after this year, as he should, so he had no future in the program. Sidney Jones, Nate Dogg Jr, Gardenhire, etc. are all freshman that will benefit a ton from the extra playing time over the last few games. But that's not even the biggest part of this.

Successful people can see past a short term pain or loss for a long term gain.

Sark would be doing anything and everything he could to get to a SPECIAL 9 WIN SEASON, what a cool year for the Huskies man. Petersen realizes the individual outcomes of these last 4 games don't really mean shit in the long run, but rather a great opportunity for growth as a program. This is Petersen saying I don't give a fuck if you're the best corner in the country in a shitty secondary, if you're not buying into the program and the team, we don't need you. If you think you're bigger than the team, we don't need you. He gave Peters a chance to clean his shit up after the Eastern debacle, he didn't, and now he's door. ass. out.

The move gives credibility to Petersen, his staff, and the program. No empty threats here. Respect the program, process, coach, and most importantly your teammates or else you can LEAVE.

Uh, no.

These next two games matter. A lot. Manage a split (or better), and Pete gets a respectable bowl bid and a lot of momentum rolling into recruiting season. Drop them both, and you spend the entire offseason answering questions about whether the program is still just treading water.

Dismissing Peters was the right call for the long-term good of the program. But pretending the short-term hit to your defense doesn't matter is wishful thinking.

If the CFP committee didn't invite you to the bowl, it's not a respectable bowl.

I think it's time to take a walk and get some perspective.

Do you think the Alamo Bowl is respectable?

 

[pawz]

For all intensive purposes, TSIO.

Peters was no doubt leaving for the league after this year, as he should, so he had no future in the program. Sidney Jones, Nate Dogg Jr, Gardenhire, etc. are all freshman that will benefit a ton from the extra playing time over the last few games. But that's not even the biggest part of this.

Successful people can see past a short term pain or loss for a long term gain.

Sark would be doing anything and everything he could to get to a SPECIAL 9 WIN SEASON, what a cool year for the Huskies man. Petersen realizes the individual outcomes of these last 4 games don't really mean shit in the long run, but rather a great opportunity for growth as a program. This is Petersen saying I don't give a fuck if you're the best corner in the country in a shitty secondary, if you're not buying into the program and the team, we don't need you. If you think you're bigger than the team, we don't need you. He gave Peters a chance to clean his shit up after the Eastern debacle, he didn't, and now he's door. ass. out.

The move gives credibility to Petersen, his staff, and the program. No empty threats here. Respect the program, process, coach, and most importantly your teammates or else you can LEAVE.

Uh, no.

These next two games matter. A lot. Manage a split (or better), and Pete gets a respectable bowl bid and a lot of momentum rolling into recruiting season. Drop them both, and you spend the entire offseason answering questions about whether the program is still just treading water.

Dismissing Peters was the right call for the long-term good of the program. But pretending the short-term hit to your defense doesn't matter is wishful thinking.

If the CFP committee didn't invite you to the bowl, it's not a respectable bowl.

I think it's time to take a walk and get some perspective.

Do you think the Alamo Bowl is respectable?

Fuck no. 53 second edit.

 

[TierbsHsotBoobs]

UCLA and arguably Arizona are good teams broski

No.

Just no.

When you're done rooting Mike Slive's cock, please explain how a 7-2 team with losses to #3 and #17, and with a blowout road 62-27 victory @ #9 doesn't qualify as 'good'

If your argument centers on narrow victories over dreckfest teams, don't bother as you've already lost.

The fact that ASU is #9 in the country just shows that that there are a maximum of eight good teams in the country. I'd call it seven, as I think MSU isn't good either.

I lied, there are nine good teams in the country. The CFP committee has two of them too low.

 

[Tequilla]

This is some high level dooging.

These games do matter. Some of us would like to reach the very attainable 10 wins. And kick UCLA's teeth in.

By your logic, we should sit our entire d line (all seniors) and get reps for the young kids. But wait, that would be stupid because winning is fun and is supposed to matter.

It sucks to lose Peters. It is what it is, but this "this is a best case scenario" shit is ridiculous.

Hmm. I agree. It would be a huge statement if Petersen won more games in his debut season (10) than SarkFS did in any of his seasons. Momentum going into the offseason for recruiting would be huge as well. We also have some unfinished business with UCLA and Mora, time to fucking win and beat a good team.

Sark left after 8 ... Tui won game #9 ...

 

[Tequilla]

UCLA and arguably Arizona are good teams broski

No.

Just no.

When you're done rooting Mike Slive's cock, please explain how a 7-2 team with losses to #3 and #17, and with a blowout road 62-27 victory @ #9 doesn't qualify as 'good'

If your argument centers on narrow victories over dreckfest teams, don't bother as you've already lost.

Maybe your eyes aren't as good as mine ... but mine show UCLA to be a sloppy team that has some significant problems on the OL. They tend to be a team that if they get hit in the mouth they tend to retreat a little bit and don't respond well to adversity. If you can take away the run game from Hundley (not the run game in general, but HIS run game), it really hurts their offense.

There's no question that they are insanely talented. However, with the exception of the ASU game this year (and really about an 8 to 10 minute stretch of that game), can you name for me any game where they looked impressive? The next closest would be what they did to Arizona ... but that depends on what your opinion of Arizona is.

 

[uzi]

He seems a lot like Ty. I'm not saying he he Ty. So don't twist. He's running off the best players and doing dumb fake punts and shit.

How many BCS bowl wins did Ty have?