There’s just no evidence

A Pennsylvania court on Friday ruled the state’s mail-in voting law is unconstitutional, with the case likely heading to the state’s Supreme Court.

The 2019 law allows any voter to vote by mail without providing a reason and contains a number of other provisions aimed at making it easier to cast a ballot. Republicans are arguing it violates an amendment to the state constitution.

Commonwealth Court Judge Mary Hannah Leavitt agreed with that argument, writing the law violates the 1838 amendment that says a person must vote in-person on Election Day unless they meet certain criteria. She wrote the law can only be changed through another constitutional amendment.

Didn't take a billion dollars
Click to expand...

What did it prove Race?

Try not to hurt yourself.
 
A Pennsylvania court on Friday ruled the state’s mail-in voting law is unconstitutional, with the case likely heading to the state’s Supreme Court.

The 2019 law allows any voter to vote by mail without providing a reason and contains a number of other provisions aimed at making it easier to cast a ballot. Republicans are arguing it violates an amendment to the state constitution.

Commonwealth Court Judge Mary Hannah Leavitt agreed with that argument, writing the law violates the 1838 amendment that says a person must vote in-person on Election Day unless they meet certain criteria. She wrote the law can only be changed through another constitutional amendment.

Didn't take a billion dollars
Click to expand...

What did it prove Race?

Try not to hurt yourself.
 
PawzTard is too stupid to tell us what this proves.
Time to use a lifeline.
Click to expand...

Still trying to figure out what NOC means while calling other's intelligence into question.

Auce.

 
https://twitter.com/KariLake/status/1699474245775155371
Click to expand...

just no evidence of . . . ?
Click to expand...

Any fuck given on internal controls.
Click to expand...

Dazzler says there are plenty of internal controls, he just can't explain what they are and how they work and if you offer suggestions he says they aren't needed. Like that box on your DMV voter registration that you check to say you are an American citizen. That's some internal control according to our hypothetical MBA.
Click to expand...

Hey they totally swear that that they are American citizens and no one ever checks their claim against the citizenship records, in fact, the state of California actively fights any effort by anyone to do so. Why wouldn't you think they're citizens?
Click to expand...

The voter rolls are the main issue in my opinion. As much as I hate the Federal government, the best solution to all of this is to leverage the IRS/SS database. Have the states send their proposed rolls to the IRS/SS, who cross check last filed tax address and citizenship requirements and approve proposals that match and reject ones that don't. SS clears out the dead people. In theory eliminates the lag problem that happens in a lot of places, including Washington where I still get three extra ballots for prior owners every election. Every social security number gets released only to one jurisdiction.

If you didn't file taxes, you don't get to vote. Have a separate process for people that moved after filing taxes where they need to create action themselves. Anyone that turned 18 after tax filing and before election is exempt one time until they file taxes and are treated like anyone else.
Click to expand...

Illegals use ID's that used to belong to others. Part of why identity fraud is such a big deal.

Plenty of them ARE paying taxes. Just with someone else's SS #.

Rand Paul pointed out the number of +100yr olds still on the roles IIRC.
 
A Pennsylvania court on Friday ruled the state’s mail-in voting law is unconstitutional, with the case likely heading to the state’s Supreme Court.

The 2019 law allows any voter to vote by mail without providing a reason and contains a number of other provisions aimed at making it easier to cast a ballot. Republicans are arguing it violates an amendment to the state constitution.

Commonwealth Court Judge Mary Hannah Leavitt agreed with that argument, writing the law violates the 1838 amendment that says a person must vote in-person on Election Day unless they meet certain criteria. She wrote the law can only be changed through another constitutional amendment.

Didn't take a billion dollars
Click to expand...

This among countless other egregious decisions is why the Supreme Court should have stepped in. They punted and the Biden selection by the deepstate was accomplished. MSLSD pundints want Trump to die in jail for questioning any of this. '46quook respects deepstate operatives like Pence, Kemp and Butterball for condemning Trump who has been right about the DS and FN all along.

 
http://twitter.com/LeadingReport/status/1700214361883603317?s=20
Click to expand...

As they should be, too much opportunity for fraud.
Click to expand...

The fact that this happened in Wisconsin and is potentially happening in Pennsylvania is actually a huge deal.
 
Last edited:
https://twitter.com/KariLake/status/1699474245775155371
Click to expand...

just no evidence of . . . ?
Click to expand...

Any fuck given on internal controls.
Click to expand...

Dazzler says there are plenty of internal controls, he just can't explain what they are and how they work and if you offer suggestions he says they aren't needed. Like that box on your DMV voter registration that you check to say you are an American citizen. That's some internal control according to our hypothetical MBA.
Click to expand...

Hey they totally swear that that they are American citizens and no one ever checks their claim against the citizenship records, in fact, the state of California actively fights any effort by anyone to do so. Why wouldn't you think they're citizens?
Click to expand...

You obviously never worked for the Federal Government. Access to Immigration records, IRS records, SS records are not readily accessible to law enforcement agencies, with some exceptions. There is no such centralized database containing “citizenship records” that I’ve ever heard of . . . Perhaps for the CIA, NSA and other intelligence agencies.

Where is the information to determine whether a body claiming citizenship (on motor voter registrations) can be verified?

Access is difficult for many of the databases due to alleged privacy concerns.
 
Last edited:
No data base I know of either. They don't want anyone to be able to check citizenship status. Most vote demonrat. That's why no ID Eben though they ask have a Mexican vote ID. Election rigging plain and simple.
 
https://twitter.com/iluminatibot/status/1701031545086333401?s=20
Worth the watch.
No idea why the tweet isn't showing up.[/i][/b]
Click to expand...

Change ‘x’ to ‘twitter’ in the url

See above

 
Last edited:
https://twitter.com/iluminatibot/status/1701031545086333401?s=20
Worth the watch.
No idea why the tweet isn't showing up.[/i][/b]
Click to expand...

Change ‘x’ to ‘twitter’ in the url

See above
Click to expand...

Well since it was copied from X I assumed it would work! Silly me.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top