Mosster47
New Fish
Last year the Quooks made it well known that the kids were playing hard and the coach was amazing.
This year the Quooks are making it well known that the kids are playing hard and the coach is amazing.
Sweet 16 = Hard play, coaching greatness. CBI = Hard play, coaching greatness.
So, the kids aren't the problem and the coach isn't the problem. Did Oregon just have this one coming? I don't get it. Quooks assured me once we got rid of the blick guy and hired an Anglo-Saxon consistency would be achieved. CBI, NIT, Sweet 16, CBI sounds a lot like what the blick guy was doing at half the cost without needed a space ship to play out of.
How can a team that is playing hard with an amazing coach be 4-8 in conference? Anyone?
This year the Quooks are making it well known that the kids are playing hard and the coach is amazing.
Sweet 16 = Hard play, coaching greatness. CBI = Hard play, coaching greatness.
So, the kids aren't the problem and the coach isn't the problem. Did Oregon just have this one coming? I don't get it. Quooks assured me once we got rid of the blick guy and hired an Anglo-Saxon consistency would be achieved. CBI, NIT, Sweet 16, CBI sounds a lot like what the blick guy was doing at half the cost without needed a space ship to play out of.
How can a team that is playing hard with an amazing coach be 4-8 in conference? Anyone?
Last edited: