dhdawg
New Fish
http://packersnews.net/phpbb3/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=22374
Best forum I could find
Best forum I could find
Last edited by a moderator:
the return of 5 reasons
- Thread starter dhdawg
- Start date
TierbsHsotBoobs
New Fish
LOL'd at Tukuafu.
Well, I guess the Packers may as well not show up.
LOL!
Karma - Still butthurt about the "Fail Mary".
Transitivity Stupidity - "Just beat the team that dominated you at home."
Pure Stupidity - "Aaron Rodgers is better on one leg than Wilson is on two."
Don't get me wrong. I think Rodgers is a damn good QB. But, I like how fans around the leauge still underestimate Wilson (he's just a game manager, etc.).
Karma - Still butthurt about the "Fail Mary".
Transitivity Stupidity - "Just beat the team that dominated you at home."
Pure Stupidity - "Aaron Rodgers is better on one leg than Wilson is on two."
Don't get me wrong. I think Rodgers is a damn good QB. But, I like how fans around the leauge still underestimate Wilson (he's just a game manager, etc.).
The dipshit argument is that Wilson has had success only because of the defense. He's never going to put up Dan Marino type numbers, but he's going to do the little things it takes to win games. Sure, the defense has bee fantastic, but Wilson keeps the offense moving and does enough to win games.
Some people are fucktarded. At least the analysts (with the exception of a handful) are drinking the Wilson Kool-Aid, FWIW.
HeretoBeatmyChest
New Fish
Thats a lot of beef hitting the hole!
TierbsHsotBoobs
New Fish
that's why we play the game right. On paper means squat.
At this point in time, Wilson is right where he belongs. He is in good company with Brady, Rodgers, and Luck. Stick a fork in Manning, he's done. Matt Ryan can be good, but he doesn't have a good supporting cast around him. Rivers, while incredibly talented, doesn't seem to have what it takes to carry the team to the next level.
dnc
New Fish
There's no way you can find 10 QB's better than Wilson.
Your top 4 are the only obvious options. No way I'd take Ryan or Rivers over him. I think you could actually make a good argument for Romo who's been chronically underrated IMO. Playing all those years for Jerry Jones FS has destroyed his national rep, but dude's really good. I'd rather have Wilson for Seattle though.
After Seattle wins three or four championships I'd like to see them acquire a legitimate top 2 or 3 WR in the league like NE did with Moss just to see what Wilson could do with that type of weapon. But as long as the defense and running game is as strong as it is I'd rather just keep winning titles.
I really think Luck-Wilson is setting up as the next Manning-Brady with Luck having the numbers and all the press but Wilson the postseason success.
HeretoBeatmyChest
New Fish
There are only a few QB's who can sniff Russ' jock.
I'd take Brady, Rodgers, P. Manning, and probably Rapelisberger over RW but that's it, and Peyton is fading fast and RW is closing in on Rapelisberger's level.
If he had a horrific knee, hip, or general leg injury and lost his speed, then he's probably behind the Romo/Rivers/Ryan class.
If he had a horrific knee, hip, or general leg injury and lost his speed, then he's probably behind the Romo/Rivers/Ryan class.
SteveInShelton
New Fish
No way you take Manning over Wilson, unless you want to lose in the playoffs every year. Before the Patriots game you could make an argument for Flacco over Wilson but Flacco royally fucked up that game. Agree about Big Ben, the gap is closing there. Rodgers, Romo, Brady are better right now but are also older. I would probably take Luck too, his coaching staff seems retarded and I think Carroll would coach the turnovers out of him.