The Re-Rank is Coming!

Yes, we had to a do a test submission early on to see if it worked, sadly, I went through and just assigned numbers, so some of this is messed up. We have all the correct numbers, we just have to put them in our own excel spreadsheet which we will do this weekend.
 
Oops, the 1 for Sean Parker was a test submission.... but @claycha‌ gave him a 2.
Click to expand...

Who is Sean Parker? If that was my only bad rank I'll be shocked. At least I had heard of him!
 
@Dennis_DeYoung‌ is going to tear that test submission a new a-hole
 
Last edited:
The amount of people that had Kohler as a 1 is ridiculous. At minimum he started for a year and at worst played significant minutes for 2 years. That's far more of a contribution as many other players voted a 2 got. I'm not suggesting that he should be ranked significantly higher, but 0 to 1's should be reserved for people that washed out of the program before making significant contributions on the field or never showed up in the process.

I also take issue with the number of people that put Jamaal Kearse as a 1 ... he was a reasonably decent special teams player that saw a lot of the field. Was he great? No. Did he contribute more than being a 1? Yes.
 
It's a subjective voting system based on the opinions of basement-dwelling, sweatpants-wearing, sock fuckers. What did you all expect?
 
It's subjective, but our thought is to pull the highest rating and the lowest rating (not counting idiot test submission) and then average it out. I think for the most part it will be pretty on the spot.
 
The amount of people that had Kohler as a 1 is ridiculous. At minimum he started for a year and at worst played significant minutes for 2 years. That's far more of a contribution as many other players voted a 2 got. I'm not suggesting that he should be ranked significantly higher, but 0 to 1's should be reserved for people that washed out of the program before making significant contributions on the field or never showed up in the process.

I also take issue with the number of people that put Jamaal Kearse as a 1 ... he was a reasonably decent special teams player that saw a lot of the field. Was he great? No. Did he contribute more than being a 1? Yes.
Click to expand...

Agree on Kohler. I disagree about Kearse. He did nothing save for a couple plays his freshman year.
 
The amount of people that had Kohler as a 1 is ridiculous. At minimum he started for a year and at worst played significant minutes for 2 years. That's far more of a contribution as many other players voted a 2 got. I'm not suggesting that he should be ranked significantly higher, but 0 to 1's should be reserved for people that washed out of the program before making significant contributions on the field or never showed up in the process.

I also take issue with the number of people that put Jamaal Kearse as a 1 ... he was a reasonably decent special teams player that saw a lot of the field. Was he great? No. Did he contribute more than being a 1? Yes.
Click to expand...

Agree on Kohler. I disagree about Kearse. He did nothing save for a couple plays his freshman year.
Click to expand...

Kearse was funny for me, I was going to give him a 1, but then I remembered he scored a TD on a fumble return in the Utah game on the road and I gave him a 2.
 
I don't remember what I ended up with Kearse...think I went 1 because his only contribution was on special teams.
 
I guess I value special team contributions more than most ... but I don't necessarily have a problem with a guy that is a depth LB/DB that is able to make solid plays on special teams ... particularly if you noticed that player on special teams.
 
I'm glad I wasn't the only one who had no idea who most of these guys were. I think I started giving ones just because I felt bad giving so many zeros.
 
Pretty cool. I voted with the majority on all but a handful if I remember correctly. A couple of notable exceptions are on Andrew Hudson, who I gave 4*, and ASJ, who I gave 5*. I went back and forth a bit on both of them and wouldn't really argue too vehemently in favor of my vote.
 
Couldn't do ASJ at 5...and Hudson might have been a 4 for me. Will wait to see the publishing.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top