The Program Is Over

Eric Dickerson isn't walking thru that door

And college football fans will be watching NBC CBS and ESPN
 
Streaming is usually like 15 second behind cable and still not the same quality. That would be my biggest issue with that. As for the schools I don't really care if they add them or not. Will probably only play them a couple times before UW bolts.
 
Why do we *need* more teams? Like, I don't get it. Why is having 10 teams so bad that it's actually better to add literally SMU and San Diego State?
 
Streaming is usually like 15 second behind cable and still not the same quality. That would be my biggest issue with that. As for the schools I don't really care if they add them or not. Will probably only play them a couple times before UW bolts.

The issue is the average fan and media won't care to search for whatever streaming service the P12 will be on, especially if they're competing for the 12:30 or 4:00 time slot against SEC or B1G teams
 
Streaming is usually like 15 second behind cable and still not the same quality. That would be my biggest issue with that. As for the schools I don't really care if they add them or not. Will probably only play them a couple times before UW bolts.

The issue is the average fan and media won't care to search for whatever streaming service the P12 will be on, especially if they're competing for the 12:30 or 4:00 time slot against SEC or B1G teams

Strictly speaking you're right but there's also a big difference between the P12 streaming their games from their phones on Twitch vs being on a new sports streaming page on Netflix which is more available and accessable to more people than FS1
 
Last edited:
If the Pac-12 is to continue as an actual conference, then those are the two best teams to add. Each of those teams could become a power in 5-7 years of being in the conference. Dallas and San Diego.

Short-term, their presence weakens the conference.
 
One of the most important things about to streaming (not Hulu or YouTubeTV) is something mentioned here a couple months ago. Casual fans watching an SEC game aren’t going to change from cable to streaming during commercials to see a PAC12 game. They’ll switch channels because it’s easier. A streaming only package kills the conference visibility.
 
If the Pac-12 is to continue as an actual conference, then those are the two best teams to add. Each of those teams could become a power in 5-7 years of being in the conference. Dallas and San Diego.

Short-term, their presence weakens the conference.

Yeah pretty much agree. Adding schools is about the market, first. Dallas market with "major" conference revenue coming in to support growing a program, and the football talent in that area, seems like the best play on the table for the PAC.
 
I am more alive than this conference.

Congrats?

Always figured you and Race would kick the bucket before DavidDawg and SLBOB

DAVIDDAWG DIED A LONG TIME AGO

ALL THAT SHOUTING DID HIM IN

Unless I'm confusing him with someone else, I knew DD in real life. He not dead, just gone.

DAVIDDAWG'S BLIND ASS WAS THE FIRST NOTEWORTHY DM.C CHARACTER TO SELL THE LIFE COUCH, IIRC.

THAT PLACE HASN'T BEEN THE SAME SINCE DAVIDDAWG STOPPED POSTING IN ALL CAPS ANYWAY.
 
If the Pac-12 is to continue as an actual conference, then those are the two best teams to add. Each of those teams could become a power in 5-7 years of being in the conference. Dallas and San Diego.

Short-term, their presence weakens the conference.

Yeah pretty much agree. Adding schools is about the market, first. Dallas market with "major" conference revenue coming in to support growing a program, and the football talent in that area, seems like the best play on the table for the PAC.

Really depends on the coaching, but we've seen that with that with Ute and TCU

Get a decent coach who has a vision and take advantage of the situation
 
Back
Top