1to392831weretaken
New Fish
Was it every long/TD run that went over the left side or just almost[/i] all of them? I can't remember.
The O line
- Thread starter RaceBannon
- Start date
Was it every long/TD run that went over the left side or just almost[/i] all of them? I can't remember.
Gladstone
New Fish
1) High percentage of plays w 2 or 3 TEs
2) Run first offense that is keeping the offense "on time"
3) High rate of 3rd down conversions - especially when running
4) Dominating TOP
It's the HH offense people cried for -- one that plays to our proven strengths (RB, O-line, TE) and should help RB recruiting going forward.
I'm looking for any reason to bash the OC but this gameplan all things considered was fine to me. Now if it's the same exact thing against UA...
2) Run first offense that is keeping the offense "on time"
3) High rate of 3rd down conversions - especially when running
4) Dominating TOP
It's the HH offense people cried for -- one that plays to our proven strengths (RB, O-line, TE) and should help RB recruiting going forward.
I'm looking for any reason to bash the OC but this gameplan all things considered was fine to me. Now if it's the same exact thing against UA...
Last edited:
You should consider self-immolation. Its for the good of the bored. And for the good of Husky Football.
http://twitter.com/UW_Football/status/1328459432552849409
backthepack
New Fish
Yeah he’s a real road grader!!
Last edited:
1to392831weretaken
New Fish
This is BTP we're talking about, I'm pretty sure typing "lol" is some form of tourette's that he can't help, so I didn't even see it!...
DoogCourics
New Fish
View attachment 26755
Thank you Doogstone. This is how I felt the last two days as I’ve been reading the boreds. No getting cute when you’re running it down the defense’s throat. No crazy formations with 17 shifts.
OSU had a weakness and Lake kept at it. The drops by Bynum, Puka, Ty, and Rome would have been big conversions and two TDs. Suddenly Morris’ numbers look much better for his first game and throw in 267 on the ground for good measure.
They had a game plan for OSU’s weakness on the line, the weather, and an inexperienced line and WB, and it worked. Lake says they plan for their offense to be able to execute multiple game plans, and we will see if that is true against Arizona. Let’s see if they are a multiple offense that adjusts to their opponent. Let’s see if Lake is all talk.
Throughout camp WR spoke highly of the aggressive downfield passing with chances to make plays. I doubt they say that shit if all they do is block.
Last edited:
Kingdome_Urinals
New Fish
Well, we ran all over Arizona last year and USC put up nearly 500 yards on them last week. So I would expect healthy doses of running. Then, presumably, a healthy portion of those "downfield strikes" we've heard so much about.
creepycoug
Well-known poster
It appears this post wasn't well supported junior. I got you though.
creepycoug
Well-known poster
Especially fudgie. Elite. lol.
creepycoug
Well-known poster
I haven't been able to get through the first two sentences of any post you've made since we? went to sigs.
DoogCourics
New Fish
In my poast getting cute was in regards to the tendency of the Petersen offense running a double reverse or some trick play to destroy a drive that had been effective from standard runs.
My point is this didn’t happen in this game. The run was working and UW stuck with it without the bullshit fluff.
backthepack
New Fish
Curne is a superstar
BeerThirty
New Fish
You like Curne because he is black, has a huge ass, and DDY told you to.
You don't like Kirkland because...well...figure it out.
Prove me wrong.
backthepack
New Fish
Curne graded out significantly higher than Kirkland did last week. Curne didn’t allow a pressure and he was going up against a future NFL player. He was mauling in the run game too.
Last edited:
DoogWhisperer
New Fish
Lol reverse racism...
Woof
New Fish
I went back and charted out every single offensive play. RIP my eyes, right @GrandpaSankey ? It's a small sample size, but the data doesn't support what BTP is suggesting.
In our non-penalty, non-garbage time offensive plays this is what happened:
Formation[/b]
11 personnel - 43%
13 personnel - 29%
12 personnel - 18%
14 personnel - 8%
21 personnel - 1%
55% of our plays were multiple TE sets. Note: I counted Westover as a TE in this, even if he was lined up in the backfield.
Rushing[/b]
Ran to the left side 51% of the time
Ran to the right side 43% of the time
Ran behind the center 6% of the time (Morris sneaks or where I couldn't quite tell)
We ran inside the tackles 86% of the time and outside the tackles 14% of the time.
Our success rates and stats for these runs were as follows:
Left-side outside the tackle: 80% success rate, 45 yards, 9.0 YPC
Left-side inside the tackle: 55% success rate, 146 yards, 7.8 YPC
Middle: 100% success rate, 7 yards, 2.3 YPC
Right-side inside the tackle: 47% success rate, 59 yards, 3.1 YPC
Right-side outside the tackle: 100% success rate, 24 yards, 12.0 YPC
Success rate by runner:
Newton: 40%
Pleasant: 36%
McGrew 78%
Morris: 100%
Westover 100%
Davis 50%
Bynum 100%
Odunze 0%
McMillan 100%
Passing[/b]
We ran play action 8 times, or 33% of the times we dropped back to throw.
Success rate with play action: 50%
Success rate without play action: 40%
I can cut the numbers a few more ways if anyone cares.
Last edited: