I suppose it must be my upbringing which has taken longer than probably anybody else around here, but give me Bronco breath any day over scumbag. It's not the tradition of Trojan athletics coming to foul our turf by the lake that was so disgusting, but that a succession of UW presidents forced us for two decades to swallow USC's.... stain.
The new Doog
- Thread starter doogsinparadise
- Start date
D
[Deleted User]
Guest
PLSS silence in this thread speaks volumes.
D
[Deleted User]
Guest
That's different because he had his MWC team and was put in a BCS conference. Like Peterman would struggle if Boise was immediately put into the Pac-12.
Also prior to Whittingham Utah was BCS good already with Meyer while Boise wasn't.
Lazy comparison.
TierbsHsotBoobs
New Fish
The fuck?
2001 Boise State 8–4 6–2 2nd
2002 Boise State 12–1 8–0 1st W Humanitarian 12 15
2003 Boise State 13–1 8–0 1st W Fort Worth 15 16
2004 Boise State 11–1 8–0 1st L Liberty 13 12
2005 Boise State 9–4 7–1 T–1st L MPC Computers
Boise State: 53–11 37–3
D
[Deleted User]
Guest
What part of "Also prior to Whittingham Utah was BCS good already with Meyer while Boise wasn't. " BCS good don't you understand?
TierbsHsotBoobs
New Fish
Boise State was BCS good in 2003 and 2004. They just didn't get there because big school bias.
doogsinparadise
New Fish
A lot of people putting words in my mouth, did I say anythingc about Dude Brah?
CuntWaffle
New Fish
So you are saying we are being a bunch of twisters?
What exactly should we criticize at this point? That Spring Ball isn't open to fans? Wait until he loses a few games. Everyone still hates losing and Peterman has to win to be praised. It's no different from any other coach.
Everyone is pumped that we have a proven winner that isn't a bullshit artist like Sark. Peterman's a real football coach who more than deserves this job.
HeretoBeatmyChest
New Fish
Regarding the Wittingham comparison, I debunked it a while back with SRS data.
In the 6 or so years prior to Wittingham, Utah averaged like 33rd while Boise was about the same in the years before Petersen. Wittingham prior to being in the Pac averaged about the same (33rd) while Petersen's average was 21.7 I believe. It was even better two years ago or one year ago.
Utah in the Pac under Witt has averaged 49 which is a 16 pt difference. We could be generous and say that Boise might be about the same under Petersen in the pac. The reason might be because he'd average 8 wins a year with a tough schedule. He would get better players just as Wittingham has because of being in the pac-12.
Bottom line, Wittingham's struggles are not applicable or predictive to Petersen's performance at UW.
In the 6 or so years prior to Wittingham, Utah averaged like 33rd while Boise was about the same in the years before Petersen. Wittingham prior to being in the Pac averaged about the same (33rd) while Petersen's average was 21.7 I believe. It was even better two years ago or one year ago.
Utah in the Pac under Witt has averaged 49 which is a 16 pt difference. We could be generous and say that Boise might be about the same under Petersen in the pac. The reason might be because he'd average 8 wins a year with a tough schedule. He would get better players just as Wittingham has because of being in the pac-12.
Bottom line, Wittingham's struggles are not applicable or predictive to Petersen's performance at UW.
Other than the upset of pre-Saban Alabama, it's doubtful that either the Meyer's or Whittingham's Utah teams have ever been as you say BCS good. Whittingham has had two games against Petersen coached BSU and lost both: 3-36 at home in SLC (2006) and 3-26 at the Maaco Bowl (2010). Meyers as Utah coach never had to coach against BSU and Petersen.
I'm one who's never been impressed by the Utes as a football program that qualified for membership in the Pac-12. They should have stayed in the MWC where they belong, but they're with us now and provide a good muse football wise for WSU.