The Divider in Chief

I want my country back

Pleas show causation how getting your country back isn't racist.

especially when causation-americans have all the special powers.

Research6.jpg
 
young women who raise kids without a father live in poverty at much high rates than those who don't have kids or have a partner involved in the kids life. Kids in poverty commit more crimes and have a higher chance of living in poverty as adults than those who don't live in poverty...and they all drink water. What the fuck is up with the water?

By the way, the chicken example was pretty racist.
 
Last edited:
nbcpolitics.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/07/19/19563211-obama-trayvon-martin-could-have-been-me-35-years-ago?lite

Obama also could have been one of the hundreds killed this year in his home city, but he won't say that.

It interesting that Obama knows for sure that the only reason Zimmerman followed Martin was because he was black (which is speculation), yet can't seem to make any determination on Benghazi.

I can't even construct a fake argument against your stupidity.

Because you don't have one.
 
nbcpolitics.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/07/19/19563211-obama-trayvon-martin-could-have-been-me-35-years-ago?lite

Obama also could have been one of the hundreds killed this year in his home city, but he won't say that.

It interesting that Obama knows for sure that the only reason Zimmerman followed Martin was because he was black (which is speculation), yet can't seem to make any determination on Benghazi.

I can't even construct a fake argument against your stupidity.

Because you don't have one.

There's nothing to argue. You read things that aren't there. You bring things up that are completely irrelevant. You're fighting an argument that you've made up in your head.
 
Last edited:
nbcpolitics.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/07/19/19563211-obama-trayvon-martin-could-have-been-me-35-years-ago?lite

Obama also could have been one of the hundreds killed this year in his home city, but he won't say that.

It interesting that Obama knows for sure that the only reason Zimmerman followed Martin was because he was black (which is speculation), yet can't seem to make any determination on Benghazi.

I can't even construct a fake argument against your stupidity.

Because you don't have one.

There's nothing to argue. You read things that aren't there. You bring things up that are completely irrelevant. You're fighting an argument that you've made up in your head.

Yeah I am
 
Last edited:
nbcpolitics.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/07/19/19563211-obama-trayvon-martin-could-have-been-me-35-years-ago?lite

Obama also could have been one of the hundreds killed this year in his home city, but he won't say that.

It interesting that Obama knows for sure that the only reason Zimmerman followed Martin was because he was black (which is speculation), yet can't seem to make any determination on Benghazi.

Fuck Zimmerman, but Obama blaming it on race is wrong. I guess he knows where his bread is buttered? I don't really give a shit about politics, but I don't think the president should be throwing gas on the fire. This is already a hostile situation. Is it far fetched to think Zimmerman would have followed a skin head? Or a scary looking Essay with the teardrop tattoos?

 
Last edited:
nbcpolitics.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/07/19/19563211-obama-trayvon-martin-could-have-been-me-35-years-ago?lite

Obama also could have been one of the hundreds killed this year in his home city, but he won't say that.

It interesting that Obama knows for sure that the only reason Zimmerman followed Martin was because he was black (which is speculation), yet can't seem to make any determination on Benghazi.

Fuck Zimmerman, but Obama blaming it on race is wrong. I guess he knows where his bread is buttered? I don't really give a shit about politics, but I don't think the president should be throwing gas on the fire. This is already a hostile situation. Is it far fetched to think Zimmerman would have followed a skin head? Or a scary looking Essay with the teardrop tattoos?

So being black is equivelant to having a teardrop tattoo.

I don't see at all what you guys are reading. Blaming it on race? Where? By saying it might have been different if Martin had been white? Is that some controversial statement?

Obama did a very nice job of explaining why black people are upset and the actions that have caused them to view things like this in a specific way. What he said was deliberate and well thought out. There is no gas being thrown on the fire in those comments. If you read it that way that's on you. You have your own issues.
 
There is a class of colored people who make a business of keeping the troubles, the wrongs, and the hardships of the Negro race before the public. Having learned that they are able to make a living out of their troubles, they have grown into the settled habit of advertising their wrongs-partly because they want sympathy and partly because it pays. Some of these people do not want the Negro to lose his grievances, because they do not want to lose their jobs.
 
Last edited:
nbcpolitics.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/07/19/19563211-obama-trayvon-martin-could-have-been-me-35-years-ago?lite

Obama also could have been one of the hundreds killed this year in his home city, but he won't say that.

It interesting that Obama knows for sure that the only reason Zimmerman followed Martin was because he was black (which is speculation), yet can't seem to make any determination on Benghazi.

Fuck Zimmerman, but Obama blaming it on race is wrong. I guess he knows where his bread is buttered? I don't really give a shit about politics, but I don't think the president should be throwing gas on the fire. This is already a hostile situation. Is it far fetched to think Zimmerman would have followed a skin head? Or a scary looking Essay with the teardrop tattoos?

So being black is equivelant to having a teardrop tattoo.

I don't see at all what you guys are reading. Blaming it on race? Where? By saying it might have been different if Martin had been white? Is that some controversial statement?

Obama did a very nice job of explaining why black people are upset and the actions that have caused them to view things like this in a specific way. What he said was deliberate and well thought out. There is no gas being thrown on the fire in those comments. If you read it that way that's on you. You have your own issues.

I like to press the idea of federal civil rights charges which rely on the Zimmerman case being about race while claiming that I am not suggesting that the Zimmerman case was about race. That is what I like to do.
 
If the black leaders really wanted progress, they would bring forth examples of black entrepreneurial success and say "This is what we should aspire to become as a people!"

Instead, they fan the flames of old hostilities and make insipid remarks like calling Florida an apartheid state or Obama comparing himself to Trayvon Martin in an ongoing process to make every national story about himself.
 
Last edited:
There is a class of colored people who make a business of keeping the troubles, the wrongs, and the hardships of the Negro race before the public. Having learned that they are able to make a living out of their troubles, they have grown into the settled habit of advertising their wrongs-partly because they want sympathy and partly because it pays. Some of these people do not want the Negro to lose his grievances, because they do not want to lose their jobs.

Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson and the like have made a cottage industry out of perceived black suffering, to the general detriment of said community. Sad really.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top