The BCS didn't make the SEC great

As my friend @HoustonHusky‌ pointed out, the SEC only won two of the first eight BCS playoff titles.

They only had one of those wins before Nick Saban and Urban Meyer built programs that won seven of their other eight titles. Now Saban is 63 and sounds ready to retire while Meyer is building a dynasty in Columbus.

Two great coaches made the SEC great, not the playoff system.

As we've always said, coaching matters.
 
As my friend @HoustonHusky‌ pointed out, the SEC only won two of the first eight BCS playoff titles.

They only had one of those wins before Nick Saban and Urban Meyer built programs that won seven of their other eight titles. Now Saban is 63 and sounds ready to retire while Meyer is building a dynasty in Columbus.

Two great coaches made the SEC great, not the playoff system.

As we've always said, coaching matters.

Case closed, 'nuff said, end of discussion.
 
As my friend @HoustonHusky‌ pointed out, the SEC only won two of the first eight BCS playoff titles.

They only had one of those wins before Nick Saban and Urban Meyer built programs that won seven of their other eight titles. Now Saban is 63 and sounds ready to retire while Meyer is building a dynasty in Columbus.

Two great coaches made the SEC great, not the playoff system.

As we've always said, coaching matters.

In theory, yes but then this interferes with that thought...

LES-miles.jpg


 
As my friend @HoustonHusky‌ pointed out, the SEC only won two of the first eight BCS playoff titles.

They only had one of those wins before Nick Saban and Urban Meyer built programs that won seven of their other eight titles. Now Saban is 63 and sounds ready to retire while Meyer is building a dynasty in Columbus.

Two great coaches made the SEC great, not the playoff system.

As we've always said, coaching matters.

In theory, yes but then this interferes with that thought...

LES-miles.jpg

And then this....

112512-CFB-auburn-gene-chizik-LN-PI_20121125143821940_660_320.JPG


 
As my friend @HoustonHusky‌ pointed out, the SEC only won two of the first eight BCS playoff titles.

They only had one of those wins before Nick Saban and Urban Meyer built programs that won seven of their other eight titles. Now Saban is 63 and sounds ready to retire while Meyer is building a dynasty in Columbus.

Two great coaches made the SEC great, not the playoff system.

As we've always said, coaching matters.

In theory, yes but then this interferes with that thought...

LES-miles.jpg

Some coaches can inherit/luck their way to one national title.

It might happen again in 10 days.
 
As my friend @HoustonHusky‌ pointed out, the SEC only won two of the first eight BCS playoff titles.

They only had one of those wins before Nick Saban and Urban Meyer built programs that won seven of their other eight titles. Now Saban is 63 and sounds ready to retire while Meyer is building a dynasty in Columbus.

Two great coaches made the SEC great, not the playoff system.

As we've always said, coaching matters.

In theory, yes but then this interferes with that thought...

LES-miles.jpg

And then this....

112512-CFB-auburn-gene-chizik-LN-PI_20121125143821940_660_320.JPG
Buying the best player in America is great coaching.
 
Last edited:
Come on boobie. We all know that rampant cheating and ESECPN bias made the SEC great.

Yes. I remember how the ridiculous pro-SEC bias left an undefeated Auburn team out.
Yeah, but USC got screwed that one time and they had two SEC teams in the title once!!
 
As my friend @HoustonHusky‌ pointed out, the SEC only won two of the first eight BCS playoff titles.

They only had one of those wins before Nick Saban and Urban Meyer built programs that won seven of their other eight titles. Now Saban is 63 and sounds ready to retire while Meyer is building a dynasty in Columbus.

Two great coaches made the SEC great, not the playoff system.

As we've always said, coaching matters.

Yes it did, along with ESPN and the brainwashed voters. Pull your fucking head out your cunt boob.
 
As my friend @HoustonHusky‌ pointed out, the SEC only won two of the first eight BCS playoff titles.

They only had one of those wins before Nick Saban and Urban Meyer built programs that won seven of their other eight titles. Now Saban is 63 and sounds ready to retire while Meyer is building a dynasty in Columbus.

Two great coaches made the SEC great, not the playoff system.

As we've always said, coaching matters.

Yes it did, along with ESPN and the brainwashed voters. Pull your fucking head out your cunt boob.

The SEC only played in and won one of the first five BCS titles and had an undefeated team left out in 2004.

The system didn't have a bias to the SEC. It had a bias in favor of great coaching.
 
Take a break, come back in a week and post something that matters.

I apologize for posting facts as I know how much you hate them.

You have proven that you also hate facts.

Disagree. I like conference standings a lot more than trusting a shit eye test that picks a team who has beaten one ranked team this season.

For some reason, I think seven conference wins is better than five. Sark was a huge fan of 5-4 seasons though.
 
Take a break, come back in a week and post something that matters.

I apologize for posting facts as I know how much you hate them.

You have proven that you also hate facts.

Disagree. I like conference standings a lot more than trusting a shit eye test that picks a team who has beaten one ranked team this season.

For some reason, I think seven conference wins is better than five. Sark was a huge fan of 5-4 seasons though.

Says the guy who now resorts to Sagarian to say 2-6 Arkansas is better than 11 of 12 PAC 12 teams.

Sagarian overrated the SEC like everyone else. They didn't beat one top 10 team out of conference or bowl seasons. When UCLA beats Kansas State, maybe not even a top 20.

ASU will finish ahead of Arizona. With a win, UCLA will too. Those are facts. USC and Utah have outside chances as well.
 
Last edited:
Take a break, come back in a week and post something that matters.

I apologize for posting facts as I know how much you hate them.

You have proven that you also hate facts.

Disagree. I like conference standings a lot more than trusting a shit eye test that picks a team who has beaten one ranked team this season.

For some reason, I think seven conference wins is better than five. Sark was a huge fan of 5-4 seasons though.

Says the guy who now resorts to Sagarian to say 2-6 Arkansas is better than 11 of 12 PAC 12 teams.

Sagarian overrated the SEC like everyone else. They didn't beat one top 10 team out of conference or bowl seasons. When UCLA beats Kansas State, maybe not even a top 20.

That was sarcasm. Keep up. I do think Arkansas could beat 11 out of 12 though, but we'll never know because Larry Scott Fucking Stupid can't put together a bowl game against the SEC.

Sagarin tends to dramatically overrate some conferences every year and his system clearly overrates the SEC and the Pac-12 South this year.

Then again, who do you rate when every conference sucks?
 
Back
Top