The Alamo bowl just got a huge boost

puppylove_sugarsteel

puppylove_sugarsteel

Asshole Emeritus
The otherwise shitty bowl matching the Pac12 #2 vs the big12 #9 has just gained some instant credibility. Tom Hanson f*** this conference and it's bowl lineup beyond repair. Finally the PAC 12 bowls are starting to gain some. steam.

Sounds like The big12 #2 is going to face the pac12 #2. Could it be that a pac12 bowl might actually get some national interest?

 
Tom Hansen said that the pac10 had no business playing in a Jan1 bowl (other than the rose) because the games were on the east coast and fans wouldn't travel.

The Guy was such a short-sided fucking moron, he set the pac12 back decades. Why get national and specifically east coast exposure? That wouldn't help recruiting. That Guy was A FUCKING IDIOT. No wonder nobody knows what state the Washington Huskies play in. Maybe the Alamo bowl will be a good start towards national exposure (even though the big12 stinks, lots of people will watch a #2 Texas or Oklahoma)
 
I'm hearing that the guys over at dawgman miss you, Steelheader. This is just what I am hearing, but you may want to saunter back over there and never post at Hardcore Husky again.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top