Still dodging
I was right
I was right
Want to bet on whether they're running surveillance on him now?The whole conversation was captured, Mildred. I can't wait to see the results of a lawsuit for "harassment".Then they should have identified themselves if they had a legitimate reason to be talking to that person... otherwise it's harrasment, which is against the law, Turbo.
I would think that's very likely. Wouldn't you?Want to bet on whether they're running surveillance on him now?The whole conversation was captured, Mildred. I can't wait to see the results of a lawsuit for "harassment".Then they should have identified themselves if they had a legitimate reason to be talking to that person... otherwise it's harrasment, which is against the law, Turbo.
On what basis? The Feebs said it wasn't illegal. No crime. Spend large dollars in him but not in the guy that was at the good course with a gun to shoot Trump? He's been known forever but he works for your side. Comrade Gertrude.I would think that's very likely. Wouldn't you?Want to bet on whether they're running surveillance on him now?The whole conversation was captured, Mildred. I can't wait to see the results of a lawsuit for "harassment".Then they should have identified themselves if they had a legitimate reason to be talking to that person... otherwise it's harrasment, which is against the law, Turbo.
For what crime?I would think that's very likely. Wouldn't you?Want to bet on whether they're running surveillance on him now?The whole conversation was captured, Mildred. I can't wait to see the results of a lawsuit for "harassment".Then they should have identified themselves if they had a legitimate reason to be talking to that person... otherwise it's harrasment, which is against the law, Turbo.
racist@MallCop
If you have information on who the Feds are surveilling and what they're spending on each subject, you should post it.
But I see you identify with this racist Libertarian. Your side?
I worked a metric shit ton of surveillance. Always had a reason though. A felony criminal reason. Never followed why one or worked a write tap because some one expressed some speech that was perfectly legal. See the difference?@MallCop
If you have information on who the Feds are surveilling and what they're spending on each subject, you should post it.
But I see you identify with this racist Libertarian. Your side?
Never any surveillance of someone who walked right up to the edge of criminality?I worked a metric shit ton of surveillance. Always had a reason though. A felony criminal reason. Never followed why one or worked a write tap because some one expressed some speech that was perfectly legal. See the difference?@MallCop
If you have information on who the Feds are surveilling and what they're spending on each subject, you should post it.
But I see you identify with this racist Libertarian. Your side?
What edge did they walk up to?Never any surveillance of someone who walked right up to the edge of criminality?I worked a metric shit ton of surveillance. Always had a reason though. A felony criminal reason. Never followed why one or worked a write tap because some one expressed some speech that was perfectly legal. See the difference?@MallCop
If you have information on who the Feds are surveilling and what they're spending on each subject, you should post it.
But I see you identify with this racist Libertarian. Your side?
Bullshit
You assume too much. barry was an attorney. Both Clinton's. The dementia patient and Headboard are attorneys. The three dem Supreme Court justices that can't read the Constitution are attorneys. I assume most attorneys are dems.The fact HHusky is an attorney and doesn't believe in civil rights is amazing.
Still waiting for you to identify the civil rights violation here, Marge.The fact HHusky is an attorney and doesn't believe in civil rights is amazing.
TrueYou assume too much. barry was an attorney. Both Clinton's. The dementia patient and Headboard are attorneys. The three dem Supreme Court justices that can't read the Constitution are attorneys. I assume most attorneys are dems.The fact HHusky is an attorney and doesn't believe in civil rights is amazing.
So you think it is legal for the government to go after a private citizen for protected speech?Still waiting for you to identify the civil rights violation, Marge.The fact HHusky is an attorney and doesn't believe in civil rights is amazing.
"go after"?So you think it is legal for the government to go after a private citizen for protected speech?Still waiting for you to identify the civil rights violation, Marge.The fact HHusky is an attorney and doesn't believe in civil rights is amazing.
The pussy is the government bootlicker"go after"?So you think it is legal for the government to go after a private citizen for protected speech?Still waiting for you to identify the civil rights violation, Marge.The fact HHusky is an attorney and doesn't believe in civil rights is amazing.
Gawd, you're pussy!