Supreme Court allows for disinformation to be removed from Social Media

But the plaintiffs “cannot manufacture standing merely by inflicting harm on themselves [self-censorship] based on their fears of hypothetical future harm that is not certainly impending.
Translation: Amy says we can't hand you an injunction just because you're a Right Wing fraidy cat.
If you don't look for harm you won't find it. Trump was harmed by the censorship and lies coordinated by Blinken about Hunter's laptop. Not hard to find someone harmed by their doctor's refusal to prescribe ivermectin based on Fow Chee, the CDC and FDA lying about it and getting social media to censor "disinformation". The leftard position is accordingly that the government can threaten media platforms if they don't suppress free speech, which they did, and there is no remedy available. Scratch a leftist, find a fascist.
 
Simple, Trump had a hand in this himself. Pressuring the FED and Jerome Powell to reverse course on raising interest rates 7-8 years ago and lowering them instead in a hot economy is part of that 9.1 % increase. Biden's policies themselves aren't to blame. Blame the previous 10 -15 years of free money.

I don't want to talk advanced topics with you. It'll take too long, you'll go to this guy's X account and wait for the rebutal so you can pose it as your own thought.
That misses the point completely

Good job
The same people that said Biden wouldn't cause inflation that he in fact did cause say Trump’s mythical future policies will cause inflation
worst inflation since Carter under Biden
Try again
 
Simple, Trump had a hand in this himself. Pressuring the FED and Jerome Powell to reverse course on raising interest rates 7-8 years ago and lowering them instead in a hot economy is part of that 9.1 % increase. Biden's policies themselves aren't to blame. Blame the previous 10 -15 years of free money.

I don't want to talk advanced topics with you. It'll take too long, you'll go to this guy's X account and wait for the rebutal so you can pose it as your own thought.
That misses the point completely

Good job
The same people that said Biden wouldn't cause inflation that he in fact did cause say Trump’s mythical future policies will cause inflation
worst inflation since Carter under Biden
Try again
I mean….his policies didn't. The inflation is coming from the 10-15 year span of free money finally catching up to everyone.

Trump wants to be able to set those interest rates himself. THAT will cause inflation again, but outside his term since he doesn't care about long term effects.

Oh man, I cant wait to see what Twitter/X replies with.
 
But the plaintiffs “cannot manufacture standing merely by inflicting harm on themselves [self-censorship] based on their fears of hypothetical future harm that is not certainly impending.
Translation: Amy says we can't hand you an injunction just because you're a Right Wing fraidy cat.
If you don't look for harm you won't find it. Trump was harmed by the censorship and lies coordinated by Blinken about Hunter's laptop. Not hard to find someone harmed by their doctor's refusal to prescribe ivermectin based on Fow Chee, the CDC and FDA lying about it and getting social media to censor "disinformation". The leftard position is accordingly that the government can threaten media platforms if they don't suppress free speech, which they did, and there is no remedy available. Scratch a leftist, find a fascist.
Yet when they looked . . .

The Supreme Court opinion states that none of the states and individuals who brought the suit could connect government communications about social media posts to actions taken against them.
Barrett wrote that the plaintiffs could not make a connection between government communication and moderation decisions, treated “the government” as a monolithic entity and frequently confused the timeline.
“But they fail, by and large, to link their past social-media restrictions to the defendants’ communications with the platforms,” Barrett wrote.
The plaintiffs tried to use as evidence government communications with social media companies that happened after blocking decisions against them, or government communications with a different social media company, Barrett wrote.

"But the gubment!", screeched the plaintiffs, Gasbag, and the other girls.
 
Good on them. Stop allowing the Ruskies from brainwashing folks on this board. Hey Race where you going to get your opinions and rebuttals going forward???
This has no effect on EverettChris. That man is so dumb he couldn’t read those posts anyway.
Did your Brownshirt get extra starch today?

.
 
So are Democrats still whining about expanding SCOTUS, or does that take a break until the next “wrong” decision because they ruled in favor of Fascism this time?
Wanna know how its disinformation? Because we have idiots like Sledog that repeat what they hear on Twitter and when I ask follow up questions, he has no clue about the subject. Which leads me to believe he and Race can't form their own opinions, theyre reliant on other people to tell them what to think!!
I don't answer dumb fucks. You are a gargantuan dumb fuck.
 
Oh, what a give away. Did you hear that, did you hear that, eh? That's what I'm on about -- did you see him repressing me, you saw it didn't you?

tenor-328854137.gif
 
Simple, Trump had a hand in this himself. Pressuring the FED and Jerome Powell to reverse course on raising interest rates 7-8 years ago and lowering them instead in a hot economy is part of that 9.1 % increase. Biden's policies themselves aren't to blame. Blame the previous 10 -15 years of free money.

I don't want to talk advanced topics with you. It'll take too long, you'll go to this guy's X account and wait for the rebutal so you can pose it as your own thought.
Advanced topics like the Fed setting mortgage rates?
 
Back
Top