I agree, but can also remember this exact train of thought around EJ Savannah and Ty.
LIFPO
Maybe I'm whooshed.
But didn't Ty have to play a ranked Oregon State?
I agree, but can also remember this exact train of thought around EJ Savannah and Ty.
LIFPO
Maybe I'm whooshed.
Unlike a Sark-filled team of individuals, Petersen's team is greater than the impact of any single individual. String is obviously talented ... but Petersen would be able to absorb the loss far easier than Dude Brah would.
Unlike a Sark-filled team of individuals, Petersen's team is greater than the impact of any single individual. String is obviously talented ... but Petersen would be able to absorb the loss far easier than Dude Brah would.
String is in a different league as a WR. "Addition by subtraction", "we've got plenty of depth", black black bla.
When it's 3rd and 8, on the 20, in a huge conference game, String is the guy that can go get the ball. You don't just replace that. Huge loss. Not as bad as Jason Shelley, as Hill, Janoski and Krotchlick were the only other WR'S on the roster, but it hurts because he's that huge target in the redzone, the difference between the rose bowl and San Diego perhaps.
Unlike a Sark-filled team of individuals, Petersen's team is greater than the impact of any single individual. String is obviously talented ... but Petersen would be able to absorb the loss far easier than Dude Brah would.
String is in a different league as a WR. "Addition by subtraction", "we've got plenty of depth", black black bla.
When it's 3rd and 8, on the 20, in a huge conference game, String is the guy that can go get the ball. You don't just replace that. Huge loss. Not as bad as Jason Shelley, as Hill, Janoski and Krotchlick were the only other WR'S on the roster, but it hurts because he's that huge target in the redzone, the difference between the rose bowl and San Diego perhaps.
Unlike a Sark-filled team of individuals, Petersen's team is greater than the impact of any single individual. String is obviously talented ... but Petersen would be able to absorb the loss far easier than Dude Brah would.
String is in a different league as a WR. "Addition by subtraction", "we've got plenty of depth", black black bla.
When it's 3rd and 8, on the 20, in a huge conference game, String is the guy that can go get the ball. You don't just replace that. Huge loss. Not as bad as Jason Shelley, as Hill, Janoski and Krotchlick were the only other WR'S on the roster, but it hurts because he's that huge target in the redzone, the difference between the rose bowl and San Diego perhaps.
Unlike a Sark-filled team of individuals, Petersen's team is greater than the impact of any single individual. String is obviously talented ... but Petersen would be able to absorb the loss far easier than Dude Brah would.
String is in a different league as a WR. "Addition by subtraction", "we've got plenty of depth", black black bla.
When it's 3rd and 8, on the 20, in a huge conference game, String is the guy that can go get the ball. You don't just replace that. Huge loss. Not as bad as Jason Shelley, as Hill, Janoski and Krotchlick were the only other WR'S on the roster, but it hurts because he's that huge target in the redzone, the difference between the rose bowl and San Diego perhaps.
But how does any of this affect the SEC?
Unlike a Sark-filled team of individuals, Petersen's team is greater than the impact of any single individual. String is obviously talented ... but Petersen would be able to absorb the loss far easier than Dude Brah would.
String is in a different league as a WR. "Addition by subtraction", "we've got plenty of depth", black black bla.
When it's 3rd and 8, on the 20, in a huge conference game, String is the guy that can go get the ball. You don't just replace that. Huge loss. Not as bad as Jason Shelley, as Hill, Janoski and Krotchlick were the only other WR'S on the roster, but it hurts because he's that huge target in the redzone, the difference between the rose bowl and San Diego perhaps.
But how does any of this affect the SEC?
How was Emmert a bad president?
Unlike a Sark-filled team of individuals, Petersen's team is greater than the impact of any single individual. String is obviously talented ... but Petersen would be able to absorb the loss far easier than Dude Brah would.
String is in a different league as a WR. "Addition by subtraction", "we've got plenty of depth", black black bla.
When it's 3rd and 8, on the 20, in a huge conference game, String is the guy that can go get the ball. You don't just replace that. Huge loss. Not as bad as Jason Shelley, as Hill, Janoski and Krotchlick were the only other WR'S on the roster, but it hurts because he's that huge target in the redzone, the difference between the rose bowl and San Diego perhaps.
But how does any of this affect the SEC?
How was Emmert a bad president?
That's my favorite fucktarded Kim question.
My second was after the Arizona blowout in 2012 "But how was that a bad game plan?"
I agree, but can also remember this exact train of thought around EJ Savannah and Ty.
LIFPO
Maybe I'm whooshed.
Ty wasn't 92-12
hth
I agree, but can also remember this exact train of thought around EJ Savannah and Ty.
LIFPO
Maybe I'm whooshed.
Ty wasn't 92-12
hth
Yet he lost to Ty
LIFPO because we really don't know what will happen. Losing players sucks, no way to put a positive spin on a shitty situation.
You forgot the Lars Hansen tweet, Strings insta gram "bye bye Seatle". We all know this guy is going to be a star receiver at USC. This truly sucks, and I would trade cyber miles twice over for String. Miley May be don e as well because he will never see the field under Pete. He will be firmly planted behind The other two who learned the new system
I agree, but can also remember this exact train of thought around EJ Savannah and Ty.
LIFPO
Maybe I'm whooshed.
Ty wasn't 92-12
hth
Yet he lost to Ty
LIFPO because we really don't know what will happen. Losing players sucks, no way to put a positive spin on a shitty situation.
Hi this guy lost to Ty 38-0.
HTH
![]()